Erschienen in:
11.01.2021 | Original Article
Hepamet Fibrosis Score in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients in Mexico: Lower than Expected Positive Predictive Value
verfasst von:
Fátima Higuera-de-la-Tijera, Jacqueline Córdova-Gallardo, Elizabeth Buganza-Torio, Beatriz Barranco-Fragoso, Aldo Torre, Sara Parraguirre-Martínez, Martin Edgardo Rojano-Rodríguez, Gabriel Quintero-Bustos, Graciela Castro-Narro, Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez
Erschienen in:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
|
Ausgabe 12/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been associated with different negative outcomes in the presence of advanced fibrosis. The Hepamet Fibrosis Score (HFS), a recently described noninvasive score, has shown excellent performance for the detection of advanced fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assess its performance in a Mexican population with NAFLD.
Methods
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study performed in 222 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, of whom 33(14%) had advanced fibrosis. We retrieved clinical data from each patient’s medical record to compute the HFS, the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS), and the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and assess their performance.
Results
When considering the models as continuous variables, the area under the receiving operating characteristics curve of the HFS(0.758) was not different from that of the NFS(0.669, p = 0.09) or FIB-4(0.796, p = 0.1). The HFS had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 76.7% (95% CI 57.7–90.1), 90.1% (95% CI 85–93.9), 36.7% (95% CI 19.9–56.1), and 94.3% (95% CI 88.5–97.7), respectively. Indeterminate results (i.e., gray area) were more common with FIB-4 and HFS when compared with NFS [139(63%) and 122(55%) vs 80(36%), p < 0.001]. The variables that were associated with misclassification using the HFS were diabetes [OR 3.40 (95% CI 1.42–8.10), p = 0.006] and age [OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.01–1.11), p = 0.01].
Conclusion
The HFS showed sensitivity and specificity similar to that reported in the original publication; however, the positive predictive value was 36.7% at a pretest probability of 14%. The role of the HFS in prospective studies and in combination with other methods should be further explored.