Background
Method
Case selection
Tissue samples and immunohistochemistry
Image Cytometric Analysis
Statistical Analysis
Results and Discussion
Histopathological Results
Case | Age | Gender | Histological grade | Facial nerve involvement | Metastasis | Recurrence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 35 | ♂ | II | 1* | N0 | 0** |
2 | 22 | ♀ | III | 1 | N1 | 0 |
3 | 15 | ♂ | II | 1 | N1 | 1 |
4 | 49 | ♀ | II | 1 | N0 | 0 |
5 | 44 | ♀ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
6 | 33 | ♀ | III | 1 | N1 | 1 |
7 | 17 | ♂ | II | 1 | N1 | 1 |
8 | 11 | ♂ | III | 1 | N1 | 1 |
9 | 24 | ♀ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
10 | 60 | ♂ | II | 1 | N0 | 0 |
11 | 38 | ♀ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
12 | 46 | ♀ | II | 1 | N1 | 1 |
13 | 16 | ♂ | II | 1 | N0 | 0 |
14 | 48 | ♂ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
15 | 51 | ♂ | III | 1 | N1 | 1 |
16 | 46 | ♀ | III | 1 | N1 | 0 |
17 | 13 | ♀ | II | 0 | N0 | 0 |
18 | 57 | ♂ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
19 | 14 | ♀ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
20
| 31 | ♂ | I | 0 | N0 | 0 |
P53 Immunohistochemical Results
Histological Grade | P53 immunopositivity | Mdm-2 immunopositivity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Recurrent | Primary | Recurrent | |||||
N0 | N1 | N0 | N1 | N0 | N1 | N0 | N1 | |
Grade I | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grade II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Grade III | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Total
|
10
|
6
|
0
|
6
|
8
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
Grand Total
|
16
|
6
|
14
|
2
|
Mdm2 Immunohistolochemical Results
Image Cytometric Results
Histological Grade | P53 mean area fraction (%) | Mdm-2 mean area fraction (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Recurrent | Primary | Recurrent | |
Grade I | 13.2 | 0 | 33.4 | 0 |
Grade II | 25.3 | 16.5 | 39.9 | 31.9 |
Grade III | 30.7 | 19.8 | 49.3 | 36.2 |
Grand Mean
|
23.1
|
18.2
|
40.9
|
34.1
|
Statistical Results
Descriptive statistics (P53) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade
|
Number of fields (Records)
|
Mean Area Fraction
|
Standard Deviation
| |||
Grade I | 12 | 13.18917 | 1.426180 | |||
Grade II | 44 | 20.91700 | 5.846319 | |||
Grade III | 32 | 25.26250 | 7.679862 | |||
ANOVA (p53)
| ||||||
P53 |
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
P Value
| |
Between Groups | 1295.4 | 2 | 647.68 | 16.478 |
0.0001
| |
Within Groups | 3183.8 | 81 | 39.31 | |||
Total | 686.99 | 83 | ||||
Post Hoc (Tukey HSD)
| ||||||
Dependent Variable
|
(I) Groups
|
(J) Groups
| Mean Diff. |
P Value
|
Significance
| |
P53 Mean Area Fraction | Grade I | Grade II | -7.727833 |
< 0.001
| S* | |
Grade III | -12.073333 |
< 0.001
| S | |||
Grade II | Grade III | - 4.345500 |
< 0.001
| S |
Descriptive statistics (mdm-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade
|
Number of fields (Records)
|
Mean Area Fraction
|
Standard Deviation
| |||
Grade I | 8 | 32.16375 | 1.264538 | |||
Grade II | 32 | 35.95156 | 7.165884 | |||
Grade III | 24 | 42.77000 | 5.654459 | |||
ANOVA (mdm-2)
| ||||||
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
P Value
| ||
Mdm-2 | Between Groups | 952.76 | 2 | 476.38 | 12.427 | |
Within Groups | 2338.42 | 61 | 38.33 | 0.0001 | ||
Total | 3291.18 | 63 | ||||
Post Hoc (Tukey HSD)
| ||||||
Dependent Variable
|
(I) Groups
| (J) Groups. |
Mean Diff
|
P Value
|
Significance
| |
Mdm-2 Mean Area Fraction | Grade I | Grade II | -3.787812 | < 0.001 | S* | |
Grade III | -10.606250 | < 0.001 | S | |||
Grade II | Grade III | - 6.818438 | > 0.05 | NS |
Welch Two Sample t-test (P53) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent Variable | MEC | Mean AF | 95% Confidence Interval | t | df | P value | |
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
P53 Mean Area Fraction |
Primary MEC
| 23.12033 | 4.042945 | 9.200222 | 5.1179 | 72.87 | 0.00001 |
Recurrent MEC |
18.23875
| ||||||
Welch Two Sample t-test (Mdm-2)
| |||||||
Dependent Variable
|
MEC
|
Mean AF
|
95% Confidence Interval
|
t
|
df
|
P value
| |
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
| ||||||
Mdm-2 Mean Area Fraction |
Primary MEC
| 40.89893 | 6.800357 | 11.822500 | 7.5658 | 30.697 | 0.00001 |
Recurrent MEC
| 34.14750 |
Pearson's Correlation (in both primary and recurrent cases) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Mean AF-p53 | Mean AF-Mdm-2 | ||
Mean AF-p53
|
Pearson Correlation
| 1 |
0.4762 (**)
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.0001 | ||
Mean AF-Mdm-2
|
R Squared
|
0.4762 (**)
| 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.0001 | ||
Pearson's Correlation (in primary cases only)
| |||
Mean AF-p53
|
Mean AF-Mdm-2
| ||
Mean AF-p53
|
Pearson Correlation
| 1 |
0.3864 (**)
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.0001 | ||
Mean AF-Mdm-2
|
R Squared
|
0.3864 (**)
| 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.0001 | ||
Pearson's Correlation (in recurrent cases only)
| |||
Mean AF-p53
|
Mean AF-Mdm-2
| ||
Mean AF-p53
|
Pearson Correlation
| 1 | -0.08434 |
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.5249 | ||
Mean AF-Mdm-2
|
R Squared
| -0.08434 | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed)
| 0.5249 |
Discussion
Conclusions
-
Expression of p53 and mdm-2 in primary and recurrent MEC correlates with the high histological grade.
-
P53 aberrant expression is not only considered as an early event in MEC carcinogenesis but also correlates to tumor behavior and local recurrence.
-
Mdm-2 overexpression is correlated to pathogenesis of MEC. However, no strong evidence was found between mdm-2 expression and MEC local recurrence.