Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Diabetes Reports
Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports 10/2019

01.10.2019 | Microvascular Complications—Retinopathy (DL Chao and G Yiu, Section Editors)

Imaging and Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema and Diabetic Retinopathy

verfasst von: Changyow C. Kwan, Amani A. Fawzi

Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of acquired vision loss in adults across the globe. Early identification and treatment of patients with DR is paramount for vision preservation. The aim of this review paper is to outline current and new imaging techniques and biomarkers that are valuable for clinical diagnosis and management of DR.

Recent Findings

Ultrawide field imaging and automated deep learning algorithms are recent advancements on traditional fundus photography and fluorescein angiography. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography are techniques that image retinal anatomy and vasculature and OCT is routinely used to monitor response to treatment. Many circulating, vitreous, and genetic biomarkers have been studied to facilitate disease detection and development of new treatments.

Summary

Recent advancements in retinal imaging and identification of promising new biomarkers for DR have the potential to increase detection, risk stratification, and treatment for patients with DR.
Literatur
1.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–53.PubMed
2.
• Ting DSW, Cheung GCM, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(4):260–77. Provides updated DR epidemiology and risk factors and current guidelines. PubMed
3.
4.
Kawasaki R, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, Abe S, Sone H, Yokote K, et al. Risk of cardiovascular diseases is increased even with mild diabetic retinopathy: the Japan Diabetes Complications Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):574–82.PubMed
5.
Ding J, Wong TY. Current epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(4):346–54.PubMed
6.
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.PubMed
7.
Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556–64.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Group ETDRSR. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification: ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5):786–806.
9.
Wilkinson C, Ferris III FL, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales 2003;110(9):1677–82.
10.
Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(5):1055–62.PubMed
11.
Shi L, Wu H, Dong J, Jiang K, Lu X, Shi J. Telemedicine for detecting diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(6):823–31.PubMed
12.
Mansberger SL, Sheppler C, Barker G, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Wooten K, et al. Long-term comparative effectiveness of telemedicine in providing diabetic retinopathy screening examinations: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(5):518–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Nguyen HV, Tan GSW, Tapp RJ, Mital S, Ting DSW, Wong HT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a national telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening program in Singapore. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(12):2571–80.PubMed
14.
Philip S, Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Fonseca S, Mcnamee P, Scotland GS, et al. The efficacy of automated “disease/no disease” grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1512–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. Jama. 2016;316(22):2402–10.PubMed
16.
• Tufail A, Rudisill C, Egan C, Kapetanakis VV, Salas-Vega S, Owen CG, et al. Automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software: diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with human graders. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(3):343–51. Identifies automated algorithms for DR screening capable of high diagnostic accuracy and potenital for cost savings. PubMed
17.
Rajalakshmi R, Subashini R, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Automated diabetic retinopathy detection in smartphone-based fundus photography using artificial intelligence. Eye. 2018;32(6):1138–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
• Abràmoff MD, Lavin PT, Birch M, Shah N, Folk JC. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. Digit Med. 2018;1(1). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​s41746-018-0040-6. Landmark study that lead to FDA approval of the first artificial intelligence system for DR screening.
19.
Aiello LP, Odia I, Glassman AR, Melia M, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, et al. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study standard 7-field imaging with ultrawide-field imaging for determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(1):65–73.PubMed
20.
Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Tolls D, Omar A, Thakore K, Patel B, et al. Potential efficiency benefits of nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging in an ocular telehealth diabetic retinopathy program. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):50–5.PubMed
21.
Falavarjani KG, Wang K, Khadamy J, Sadda SR. Ultra-wide-field imaging in diabetic retinopathy; an overview. J Curre Ophthalmol. 2016;28(2):57–60.
22.
Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Haddad NMN, Kwak H, Dyer KH, Omar AF, et al. Peripheral lesions identified on ultrawide field imaging predict increased risk of diabetic retinopathy progression over 4 years. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):949–56.PubMed
23.
Cole ED, Novais EA, Louzada RN, Waheed NK. Contemporary retinal imaging techniques in diabetic retinopathy: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(4):289–99.PubMed
24.
25.
26.
Rabbani H, Allingham MJ, Mettu PS, Cousins SW, Farsiu S. Fully automatic segmentation of fluorescein leakage in subjects with diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(3):1482–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Kwiterovich KA, Maguire MG, Murphy RP, Schachat AP, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al. Frequency of adverse systemic reactions after fluorescein angiography: results of a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1139–42.PubMed
28.
Kornblau IS, El-Annan JF. Adverse reactions to fluorescein angiography: a comprehensive review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64:679–93.PubMed
29.
Lee J, Rosen R. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(12):123.PubMed
30.
Kang SW, Park CY, Ham D-I. The correlation between fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic features in clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(2):313–22.PubMed
31.
Byeon SH, Chu YK, Hong YT, Kim M, Kang HM, Kwon OW. New insights into the pathoanatomy of diabetic macular edema: angiographic patterns and optical coherence tomography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2012;32(6):1087–99.
32.
Koleva-Georgieva D, Sivkova N. Types of diabetic macular edema assessed by optical coherence tomography. Folia Med. 2008;50(3):30–8.
33.
Sun JK, Lin MM, Lammer J, Prager S, Sarangi R, Silva PS, et al. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers as a predictor of visual acuity in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(11):1309–16.PubMed
34.
Sun JK, Radwan SH, Soliman AZ, Lammer J, Lin MM, Prager SG, et al. Neural retinal disorganization as a robust marker of visual acuity in current and resolved diabetic macular edema. Diabetes. 2015;64(7):2560–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Laviers H, Zambarakji H. Enhanced depth imaging-OCT of the choroid: a review of the current literature. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(12):1871–83.PubMed
36.
Kim JT, Lee DH, Joe SG, Kim J-G, Yoon YH. Changes in choroidal thickness in relation to the severity of retinopathy and macular edema in type 2 diabetic patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3378–84.PubMed
37.
Vujosevic S, Martini F, Cavarzeran F, Pilotto E, Midena E. Macular and peripapillary choroidal thickness in diabetic patients. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2012;32(9):1781–90.
38.
Massin P, Bandello F, Garweg JG, Hansen LL, Harding SP, Larsen M, et al. Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2399–405.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, et al. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):615–25.PubMed
40.
Hwang TS, Jia Y, Gao SS, Bailey ST, Lauer AK, Flaxel CJ, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography features of diabetic retinopathy. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2015;35(11):2371.
41.
• Park JJ, Soetikno BT, Fawzi AA. Characterization of the middle capillary plexus using optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy and diabetic eyes. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2016;36(11):2039 Demontrates changes in the middle capillary plexus in DR that have not been previously identified.
42.
Onishi AC, Nesper PL, Roberts PK, Moharram GA, Chai H, Liu L, et al. Importance of considering the middle capillary plexus on OCT angiography in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(5):2167–76.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Lee J, Moon BG, Cho AR, Yoon YH. Optical coherence tomography angiography of DME and its association with anti-VEGF treatment response. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2368–75.PubMed
44.
Talisa E, Chin AT, Bonini Filho MA, Adhi M, Branchini L, Salz DA, et al. Detection of microvascular changes in eyes of patients with diabetes but not clinical diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2015;35(11):2364–70.
45.
Alibhai AY, Moult EM, Shahzad R, Rebhun CB, Moreira-Neto C, McGowan M, et al. Quantifying microvascular changes using OCT angiography in diabetic eyes without clinical evidence of retinopathy. Ophthalmol Retina. 2018;2(5):418–27.
46.
Ashraf M, Nesper PL, Jampol LM, Yu F, Fawzi AA. Statistical model of optical coherence tomography angiography parameters that correlate with severity of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(10):4292–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
• Nesper PL, Roberts PK, Onishi AC, Chai H, Liu L, Jampol LM, et al. Quantifying microvascular abnormalities with increasing severity of diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(6):BIO307–BIO15. Identifies correlation between OCTA parameters in each capillary plexuses with severity of DR. PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Kim AY, Chu Z, Shahidzadeh A, Wang RK, Puliafito CA, Kashani AH. Quantifying microvascular density and morphology in diabetic retinopathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(9):OCT362–OCT70.PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
50.
Krawitz BD, Mo S, Geyman LS, Agemy SA, Scripsema NK, Garcia PM, et al. Acircularity index and axis ratio of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic eyes and healthy controls measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. Vis Res. 2017;139:177–86.PubMed
51.
Fawzi AA. Consensus on optical coherence tomographic angiography nomenclature: do we need to develop and learn a new language? JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(4):377–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Li X-X, Wu W, Zhou H, Deng J-J, Zhao M-Y, Qian T-W, et al. A quantitative comparison of five optical coherence tomography angiography systems in clinical performance. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(11):1784.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Munk MR, Giannakaki-Zimmermann H, Berger L, Huf W, Ebneter A, Wolf S, et al. OCT-angiography: a qualitative and quantitative comparison of 4 OCT-A devices. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177059.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
55.
Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image artifacts in optical coherence angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2015;35(11):2163.
56.
Enders C, Lang GE, Dreyhaupt J, Loidl M, Lang GK, Werner JU. Quantity and quality of image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210505.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Zhang M, Hwang TS, Campbell JP, Bailey ST, Wilson DJ, Huang D, et al. Projection-resolved optical coherence tomographic angiography. Biomed Opt Express. 2016;7(3):816–28.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Group DR. Diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT): update. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(4):427–33.
59.
Stratton I, Kohner E, Aldington S, Turner R, Holman R, Manley S, et al. UKPDS 50: risk factors for incidence and progression of retinopathy in type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis. Diabetologia. 2001;44(2):156–63.PubMed
60.
Chew EY, Davis MD, Danis RP, Lovato JF, Perdue LH, Greven C, et al. The effects of medical management on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes: the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2443–51.PubMed
61.
Ting DSW, Tan K-A, Phua V, Tan GSW, Wong CW, Wong TY. Biomarkers of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(12):125.PubMed
62.
Sasongko M, Wong T, Jenkins A, Nguyen T, Shaw J, Wang J. Circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial function, and their relationship to diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med. 2015;32(5):686–91.PubMed
63.
Song J, Chen S, Liu X, Duan H, Kong J, Li Z. Relationship between C-reactive protein level and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144406.PubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Simó-Servat O, Simó R, Hernández C. Circulating biomarkers of diabetic retinopathy: an overview based on physiopathology. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1–13.
65.
HIRATA K, KUBO K. Relationship between blood levels of N-carboxymethyl-lysine and pentosidine and the severity of microangiopathy in type 2 diabetes. Endocr J. 2004;51(6):537–44.PubMed
66.
67.
Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(22):1480–7.PubMed
68.
Nicholson BP, Schachat AP. A review of clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents for diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(7):915–30.PubMed
69.
Adamiec-Mroczek J, Oficjalska-Młyńczak J, Misiuk-Hojło M. Roles of endothelin-1 and selected proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: analysis of vitreous samples. Cytokine. 2010;49(3):269–74.PubMed
70.
Chernykh V, Varvarinsky E, Smirnov E, Chernykh D, Trunov AN. Proliferative and inflammatory factors in the vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(1):33–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Funatsu H, Noma H, Mimura T, Eguchi S, Hori S. Association of vitreous inflammatory factors with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(1):73–9.PubMed
72.
Praidou A, Klangas I, Papakonstantinou E, Androudi S, Georgiadis N, Karakiulakis G, et al. Vitreous and serum levels of platelet-derived growth factor and their correlation in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34(2):152–61.PubMed
73.
74.
75.
Zhou J, Wang S, Xia X. Role of intravitreal inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic factors in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(5):416–20.PubMed
76.
• McAuley AK, Sanfilippo PG, Hewitt AW, Liang H, Lamoureux E, Wang JJ, et al. Vitreous biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complicat. 2014;28(3):419–25. Meta-analysis summarizing important biomarkers in DR.
77.
Yokota T, Ma RC, Park J-Y, Isshiki K, Sotiropoulos KB, Rauniyar RK, et al. Role of protein kinase C on the expression of platelet-derived growth factor and endothelin-1 in the retina of diabetic rats and cultured retinal capillary pericytes. Diabetes. 2003;52(3):838–45.PubMed
78.
Jo N, Mailhos C, Ju M, Cheung E, Bradley J, Nishijima K, et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor B signaling enhances the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in multiple models of ocular neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):2036–53.PubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Dong A, Seidel C, Snell D, Ekawardhani S, Ahlskog JK, Baumann M, et al. Antagonism of PDGF-BB suppresses subretinal neovascularization and enhances the effects of blocking VEGF-A. Angiogenesis. 2014;17(3):553–62.PubMed
80.
Dawson D, Volpert O, Gillis P, Crawford S, Xu H-J, Benedict W, et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor: a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. Science. 1999;285(5425):245–8.PubMed
81.
Liu Y, Leo LF, McGregor C, Grivitishvili A, Barnstable CJ, Tombran-Tink J. Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) peptide eye drops reduce inflammation, cell death and vascular leakage in diabetic retinopathy in Ins2 Akita mice. Mol Med. 2012;18(10):1387–401.PubMedPubMedCentral
82.
Park K, Jin J, Hu Y, Zhou K, Ma J-x. Overexpression of pigment epithelium–derived factor inhibits retinal inflammation and neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(2):688–98.PubMedPubMedCentral
83.
Wang Q, Gorbey S, Pfister F, Höger S, Dorn-Beineke A, Krügel K, et al. Long-term treatment with suberythropoietic Epo is vaso-and neuroprotective in experimental diabetic retinopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2011;27(6):769–82.PubMed
84.
Oh IK, Kim S-W, Oh J, Lee TS, Huh K. Inflammatory and angiogenic factors in the aqueous humor and the relationship to diabetic retinopathy. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35(12):1116–27.PubMed
85.
Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Noma H, Mimura T, Nakamura S, Sakata K, et al. Aqueous humor levels of cytokines are related to vitreous levels and progression of diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(1):3–8.PubMed
86.
Chen H, Zhang X, Liao N, Wen F. Assessment of biomarkers using multiplex assays in aqueous humor of patients with diabetic retinopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):176.PubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Vujosevic S, Micera A, Bini S, Berton M, Esposito G, Midena E. Aqueous humor biomarkers of Müller cell activation in diabetic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):3913–8.PubMed
88.
89.
Hillier RJ, Ojaimi E, Wong DT, Mak MY, Berger AR, Kohly RP, et al. Aqueous humor cytokine levels as biomarkers of disease severity in diabetic macular edema. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2017;37(4):761–9.
90.
91.
Arar NH, Freedman BI, Adler SG, Iyengar SK, Chew EY, Davis MD, et al. Heritability of the severity of diabetic retinopathy: the FIND-Eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9):3839–45.PubMed
92.
Hietala K, Forsblom C, Summanen P, Groop P-H. Heritability of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 2008;57(8):2176–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Burdon KP, Fogarty RD, Shen W, Abhary S, Kaidonis G, Appukuttan B, et al. Genome-wide association study for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy reveals association with genetic variation near the GRB2 gene. Diabetologia. 2015;58(10):2288–97.PubMed
94.
Abhary S, Burdon KP, Laurie KJ, Thorpe S, Landers J, Goold L, et al. Aldose reductase gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy susceptibility. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1834–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
95.
Awata T, Inoue K, Kurihara S, Ohkubo T, Watanabe M, Inukai K, et al. A common polymorphism in the 5′-untranslated region of the VEGF gene is associated with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(5):1635–9.PubMed
96.
97.
Perrone L, Devi TS, Ki H, Terasaki T, Singh LP. Thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP) induces inflammation through chromatin modification in retinal capillary endothelial cells under diabetic conditions. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221(1):262–72.PubMed
98.
Devi TS, Somayajulu M, Kowluru RA, Singh LP. TXNIP regulates mitophagy in retinal Müller cells under high-glucose conditions: implications for diabetic retinopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(5):e2777.PubMedPubMedCentral
99.
Perrone L, Devi T, Hosoya K, Terasaki T, Singh L. Inhibition of TXNIP expression in vivo blocks early pathologies of diabetic retinopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1(8):e65.PubMedPubMedCentral
100.
Kadiyala CSR, Zheng L, Du Y, Yohannes E, Kao H-Y, Miyagi M, et al. Acetylation of retinal histones in diabetes increases inflammatory proteins effects of minocycline and manipulation of histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC). J Biol Chem. 2012;287(31):25869–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
101.
Malik AN, Parsade CK, Ajaz S, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Gnudi L, Czajka A, et al. Altered circulating mitochondrial DNA and increased inflammation in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110(3):257–65.PubMed
102.
Madsen-Bouterse SA, Mohammad G, Kanwar M, Kowluru RA. Role of mitochondrial DNA damage in the development of diabetic retinopathy, and the metabolic memory phenomenon associated with its progression. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;13(6):797–805.PubMedPubMedCentral
103.
Mishra M, Lillvis J, Seyoum B, Kowluru RA. Peripheral blood mitochondrial DNA damage as a potential noninvasive biomarker of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(10):4035–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
104.
Zampetaki A, Willeit P, Burr S, Yin X, Langley SR, Kiechl S, et al. Angiogenic microRNAs linked to incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65(1):216–27.PubMed
105.
Qing S, Yuan S, Yun C, Hui H, Mao P, Wen F, et al. Serum miRNA biomarkers serve as a fingerprint for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(5):1733–40.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging and Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema and Diabetic Retinopathy
verfasst von
Changyow C. Kwan
Amani A. Fawzi
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Diabetes Reports / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Elektronische ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1226-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Current Diabetes Reports 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Microvascular Complications—Neuropathy (R Pop-Busui, Section Editor)

Epidemiology of Peripheral Neuropathy and Lower Extremity Disease in Diabetes

Microvascular Complications—Retinopathy (DL Chao and G Yiu, Section Editors)

Emerging Insights and Interventions for Diabetic Retinopathy

Obesity (KM Gadde, Section Editor)

Medical Devices in Obesity Treatment

Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance (M-E Patti, Section Editor)

Regulation of Hepatic Metabolism, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives

Hospital Management of Diabetes (A Wallia and JJ Seley, Section Editors)

Inpatient Diabetes Education in the Real World: an Overview of Guidelines and Delivery Models

Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes (A Pugliese and SJ Richardson, Section Editors)

What Have Slow Progressors Taught Us About T1D—Mind the Gap!

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise