Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2018

02.11.2017 | Clinical Study

Imaging changes over 18 months following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: both late radiation necrosis and tumor progression can occur

verfasst von: Dylann Fujimoto, Rie von Eyben, Iris C. Gibbs, Steven D. Chang, Gordon Li, Griffith R. Harsh, Steven Hancock, Nancy Fischbein, Scott G. Soltys

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, the median time range to develop adverse radiation effect (ARE) or radiation necrosis is 7–11 months. Similarly, the risk of local tumor recurrence following SRS is < 5% after 18 months. With improvements in systemic therapy, patients are living longer and are at risk for both late (defined as > 18 months after SRS) tumor recurrence and late ARE, which have not previously been well described. An IRB-approved, retrospective review identified patients treated with SRS who developed new MRI contrast enhancement > 18 months following SRS. ARE was defined as stabilization/shrinkage of the lesion over time or pathologic confirmation of necrosis, without tumor. Local failure (LF) was defined as continued enlargement of the lesion over time or pathologic confirmation of tumor. We identified 16 patients, with a median follow-up of 48.2 months and median overall survival of 73.0 months, who had 19 metastases with late imaging changes occurring a median of 32.9 months (range 18.5–63.2 months) after SRS. Following SRS, 12 lesions had late ARE at a median of 33.2 months and 7 lesions had late LF occurring a median of 23.6 months. As patients with cancer live longer and as SRS is increasingly utilized for treatment of brain metastases, the incidence of these previously rare imaging changes is likely to increase. Clinicians should be aware of these late events, with ARE occurring up to 5.3 years and local failure up to 3.8 years following SRS in our cohort.
Literatur
1.
2.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Minniti G, Scaringi C, Paolini S et al (2016) Single-fraction versus multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) stereotactic radiosurgery for large (> 2 cm) brain metastases: a comparative analysis of local control and risk of radiation-induced brain necrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1142–1148. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.013 CrossRefPubMed Minniti G, Scaringi C, Paolini S et al (2016) Single-fraction versus multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) stereotactic radiosurgery for large (> 2 cm) brain metastases: a comparative analysis of local control and risk of radiation-induced brain necrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1142–1148. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2016.​03.​013 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U et al (2011) Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: Results of the EORTC 22952–26001 study. J Clin Oncol 29:134–141. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1655 CrossRefPubMed Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U et al (2011) Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: Results of the EORTC 22952–26001 study. J Clin Oncol 29:134–141. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​30.​1655 CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L et al (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol 47:291–298. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00507-6 CrossRef Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L et al (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol 47:291–298. doi:10.​1016/​S0360-3016(99)00507-6 CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shultz DB, Modlin LA, Jayachandran P et al (2015) Repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), deferring whole-brain irradiation, for new brain metastases after initial SRS. Int J Radiat Oncol 92:993–999. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.04.036 CrossRef Shultz DB, Modlin LA, Jayachandran P et al (2015) Repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), deferring whole-brain irradiation, for new brain metastases after initial SRS. Int J Radiat Oncol 92:993–999. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2015.​04.​036 CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR et al (2009) Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:1037–1044. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3 CrossRefPubMed Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR et al (2009) Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:1037–1044. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(09)70263-3 CrossRefPubMed
14.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cicone F, Minniti G, Romano A et al (2015) Accuracy of F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive brain metastases after radiosurgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:103–111. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2886-4 CrossRefPubMed Cicone F, Minniti G, Romano A et al (2015) Accuracy of F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive brain metastases after radiosurgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:103–111. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-014-2886-4 CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricci PE, Karis JP, Heiserman JE et al (1998) Differentiating Recurrent Tumor from Radiation Necrosis: Time for Re-evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography? Am J Neuroradiol 19:407–413PubMed Ricci PE, Karis JP, Heiserman JE et al (1998) Differentiating Recurrent Tumor from Radiation Necrosis: Time for Re-evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography? Am J Neuroradiol 19:407–413PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao ST, Suh JH, Raja S et al (2001) The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Cancer 96:191–197. doi:10.1002/ijc.1016 CrossRefPubMed Chao ST, Suh JH, Raja S et al (2001) The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Cancer 96:191–197. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​1016 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Silverman DHS, Delaloye S et al (2006) 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med 47:904–911PubMed Chen W, Silverman DHS, Delaloye S et al (2006) 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med 47:904–911PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitsuya K, Nakasu Y, Horiguchi S et al (2010) Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 99:81–88. doi:10.1007/s11060-009-0106-z CrossRefPubMed Mitsuya K, Nakasu Y, Horiguchi S et al (2010) Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 99:81–88. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-009-0106-z CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging changes over 18 months following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: both late radiation necrosis and tumor progression can occur
verfasst von
Dylann Fujimoto
Rie von Eyben
Iris C. Gibbs
Steven D. Chang
Gordon Li
Griffith R. Harsh
Steven Hancock
Nancy Fischbein
Scott G. Soltys
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2647-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.