Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 4/2013

01.04.2013 | Original Paper

Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties

verfasst von: Robert Moverley, Kenneth S. Rankin, Iain McNamara, Donald James Davidson, Mike Reed, Andrew P. Sprowson

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the future of orthopaedic research funding. We aim to characterise the trend in journal IF over the last decade and draw comparisons with other surgical specialties.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of impact factors from Journal Citation Reports between 2000 and 2010.

Results

Between 2000 and 2010 the number of orthopaedic journals increased from 24 to 41, more than any other surgical specialty and the mean IF increased from 0.842 to 1.400. Journals printed in the English language had a significantly higher IF in the year 2010 (1.64 vs. 0.33, p = 0.01) than those printed in other languages. English language journals published in the US had significantly higher mean 2010 IF (1.932 vs. 1.243, p = 0.025) than those published in Europe, and this had changed compared with 2000 mean IF (0.978 Vs. 0.704, p = 0.360). Orthopaedics was ranked sixth out of 11 surgical subspecialties in 2000 but dropped to seventh out of 11 in 2010.

Conclusions

The quality of orthopaedic journals has significantly increased over the last decade and this has been accompanied by a rise in mean IF. It is important that orthopaedics continues to improve the quality of research, which may help orthopaedic researchers secure funding in the future.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Christenson JA, Sigelman L (1985) Accrediting knowledge: journal stature and citation impact in social science. Soc Sci Q 66(4):964–975 Christenson JA, Sigelman L (1985) Accrediting knowledge: journal stature and citation impact in social science. Soc Sci Q 66(4):964–975
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111PubMedCrossRef Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Seglen PO (1997) Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52(11):1050–1056PubMedCrossRef Seglen PO (1997) Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52(11):1050–1056PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079):498–502PubMedCrossRef Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079):498–502PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute for Scientific Information (2012) Science citation index, journal citation reports, 1997. Institute for Scientific Information, Philidelphia, PA, USA Institute for Scientific Information (2012) Science citation index, journal citation reports, 1997. Institute for Scientific Information, Philidelphia, PA, USA
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Zhao MH, Kallenberg CGM (2011) The impact factor of rheumatology journals: An analysis of 2008 and the recent 10 years. Rheumatol Int 31(12):1611–1615PubMedCrossRef Chen M, Zhao MH, Kallenberg CGM (2011) The impact factor of rheumatology journals: An analysis of 2008 and the recent 10 years. Rheumatol Int 31(12):1611–1615PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurmis AP (2003) Current concepts review: understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg A 85(12):2449–2454 Kurmis AP (2003) Current concepts review: understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg A 85(12):2449–2454
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebelt M, Siebelt T, Pilot P, Bloem RM, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2010) Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for impact factor and SCImago. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:4. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-4 PubMedCrossRef Siebelt M, Siebelt T, Pilot P, Bloem RM, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2010) Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for impact factor and SCImago. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:4. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-11-4 PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosker BH, Verheyen CC (2006) The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000–2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):156–158 Bosker BH, Verheyen CC (2006) The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000–2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):156–158
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hecht F, Hecht BK, Sandberg AA (1998) The journal “impact factor”: a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 104(2):77–81PubMedCrossRef Hecht F, Hecht BK, Sandberg AA (1998) The journal “impact factor”: a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 104(2):77–81PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Saper CB (1999) What’s in a citation impact factor? A journal by any other measure. J Comp Neurol 411(1):1–2PubMedCrossRef Saper CB (1999) What’s in a citation impact factor? A journal by any other measure. J Comp Neurol 411(1):1–2PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieck GC (2000) The “impact factor”: what it means to the impact of applied physiology. J Appl Physiol 89(3):865–866PubMed Sieck GC (2000) The “impact factor”: what it means to the impact of applied physiology. J Appl Physiol 89(3):865–866PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Boldt J, Haisch G, Maleck WH (2000) Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44(7):842–849PubMedCrossRef Boldt J, Haisch G, Maleck WH (2000) Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44(7):842–849PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2449–2454PubMed Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2449–2454PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):388–396 Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):388–396
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons NR, Hiskens R, Price CL, Achten J, Costa ML (2011) A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1154–1159PubMedCrossRef Parsons NR, Hiskens R, Price CL, Achten J, Costa ML (2011) A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1154–1159PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh JA, Murphy S, Bhandari M (2009) Assessment of the methodologic quality of medical and surgical clinical trials in patients with arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 36(12):2642–2654PubMedCrossRef Singh JA, Murphy S, Bhandari M (2009) Assessment of the methodologic quality of medical and surgical clinical trials in patients with arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 36(12):2642–2654PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties
verfasst von
Robert Moverley
Kenneth S. Rankin
Iain McNamara
Donald James Davidson
Mike Reed
Andrew P. Sprowson
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1769-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

International Orthopaedics 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.