Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2016

05.02.2016 | Original Article

Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection

verfasst von: Sergio Cadoni, Přemysl Falt, Stefano Sanna, Mariangela Argiolas, Viviana Fanari, Paolo Gallittu, Mauro Liggi, Donatella Mura, Maria L. Porcedda, Vit Smajstrla, Matteo Erriu, Felix W. Leung

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Low adenoma detection rate (ADR) predicts development of interval cancers, found mainly in the right (cecum-ascending) colon, where poor bowel preparation is an associated factor. Single-site studies reported increased detection of adenomas in the proximal colon segments by water exchange (WE). Data about colon cleansing revealed that WE had the greatest impact in the right colon.

Aims

To test the hypothesis that WE had the greatest impact on ADR in colon segments with the most favorable bowel cleanliness scores, namely the right colon.

Methods

We pooled right colon and overall ADR data of three similarly designed colonoscopy trials that compared WE, water immersion (WI) and insufflation of air or carbon dioxide (AICD) in a mixed gender European population.

Results

In this study, 1200 (704 males) subjects and were included. 288 were screening cases. Demographic and procedural data were comparable. Water exchange achieved significantly higher right colon <10 mm ADR (11.9 %, vs WI 6.9 %, p = 0.016; vs AICD 7.2 %, p = 0.025). Water exchange achieved the lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation and the highest right colon and overall Boston bowel preparation scale scores (p range 0.003, <0.0005). In patients with right colon excellent bowel cleanliness, water exchange was the only method significantly associated with right colon adenoma detection. One of the limitations is unblinded colonoscopists.

Conclusions

In a mixed gender European population, water exchange is confirmed to be a superior insertion technique showing a significant increase in <10 mm right colon adenoma detection, achieving the cleanest colon and lowest proportions of poor bowel preparation requiring repeat procedures.

ClinicalTrials.Gov No

NCT01781650, 01954862, 01780818.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1012–1014.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1012–1014.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh Y-H, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1390–1400.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh Y-H, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1390–1400.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:557–566.CrossRefPubMed Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:557–566.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, et al. Water exchange is the least-painful colonoscope insertion technique, increasing completion of unsedated colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1972–1980.CrossRefPubMed Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, et al. Water exchange is the least-painful colonoscope insertion technique, increasing completion of unsedated colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1972–1980.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:657–666.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:657–666.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung FW, Hu B, Wu J. Comparative effectiveness of water immersion and water exchange versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3:100–103.CrossRef Leung FW, Hu B, Wu J. Comparative effectiveness of water immersion and water exchange versus air insufflation for colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3:100–103.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung FW, Harker JO, Leung JW, et al. The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:8–13.PubMedPubMedCentral Leung FW, Harker JO, Leung JW, et al. The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:8–13.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yen AW, Yung VY, Leung JW, et al. Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection—a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2015;5:3–9.CrossRef Yen AW, Yung VY, Leung JW, et al. Insertion water exchange minimizes endoscopist multitasking during withdrawal inspection—a plausible explanation for enhanced polyp detection in the right colon. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2015;5:3–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:903–924.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC III, et al. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:691–699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC III, et al. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:691–699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:693–700.CrossRefPubMed Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:693–700.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:67–76.PubMed Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:67–76.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. ASGE/ACG taskforce on quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. ASGE/ACG taskforce on quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CMC, Dekker E, et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. 2015;64:1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed Sanduleanu S, le Clercq CMC, Dekker E, et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. 2015;64:1257–1267.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LB. Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:406–412.CrossRefPubMed Cohen LB. Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:406–412.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463–470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463–470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh CH, Lee CK, Kim JW, et al. Suboptimal bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2294–2303.CrossRefPubMed Oh CH, Lee CK, Kim JW, et al. Suboptimal bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2294–2303.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.CrossRefPubMed le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014;63:957–963.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–1121.CrossRefPubMed Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–1121.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–864.CrossRefPubMed Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–864.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. 2012;61:1576–1582.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut. 2012;61:1576–1582.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–956.CrossRefPubMed Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63:949–956.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rondagh EJA, Bouwens MWE, Riedl RG, et al. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1218–1225.CrossRefPubMed Rondagh EJA, Bouwens MWE, Riedl RG, et al. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1218–1225.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1395–1401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, et al. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1395–1401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Limketkai BN, Lam-Himlin D, Arnold MA, et al. The cutting edge of serrated polyps: a practical guide to approaching and managing serrated colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:360–375.CrossRefPubMed Limketkai BN, Lam-Himlin D, Arnold MA, et al. The cutting edge of serrated polyps: a practical guide to approaching and managing serrated colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:360–375.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.CrossRefPubMed van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRefPubMed Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.CrossRefPubMed Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1259–1264.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2012;118:3044–3052.CrossRefPubMed Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2012;118:3044–3052.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter JM, Campbell EJ, Chung DC. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:46–51.CrossRefPubMed Richter JM, Campbell EJ, Chung DC. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:46–51.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TMF, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:950–960.CrossRefPubMed Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TMF, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:950–960.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.CrossRefPubMed Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRefPubMed Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.CrossRefPubMed Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME, et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:603–608.CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME, et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:603–608.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2015. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685.PubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2015. doi:10.​1136/​gutjnl-2015-310685.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696–1700.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1696–1700.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:172–180.CrossRefPubMed Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:172–180.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben Q, An W, Jiang Y, et al. Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:762–772.CrossRefPubMed Ben Q, An W, Jiang Y, et al. Body mass index increases risk for colorectal adenomas based on meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:762–772.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat MacPhail ME, Hardacker KA, Tiwari A, et al. Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:525–530.CrossRefPubMed MacPhail ME, Hardacker KA, Tiwari A, et al. Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:525–530.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection
verfasst von
Sergio Cadoni
Přemysl Falt
Stefano Sanna
Mariangela Argiolas
Viviana Fanari
Paolo Gallittu
Mauro Liggi
Donatella Mura
Maria L. Porcedda
Vit Smajstrla
Matteo Erriu
Felix W. Leung
Publikationsdatum
05.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4053-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

DDS-GRG Profiles and Perspectives

GRG Profiles: Jackie D. Wood

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.