nach oben

Sports Medicine

Erschienen in:

20.11.2019 | Leading Article

Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science

verfasst von: Louise Czosnek, Nicole Rankin, Eva Zopf, Justin Richards, Simon Rosenbaum, Prue Cormie

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Exercise is an efficacious therapy for many chronic diseases. Integrating efficacious evidence-based interventions (EBIs), such as exercise, into daily healthcare practice is a slow and complex pursuit. Implementation science seeks to understand and address this phenomenon by conducting studies about the methods used to promote the routine uptake of EBIs. The purpose of this article is to explore implementation science and a common conceptual framework in the discipline, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), as it applies to exercise EBI. We conclude by offering recommendations for future research that leverage implementation science priorities to highlight the potential of this research field for advancing the implementation of exercise EBI.

Balas E, Boren S. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. IMIA Yearbook. 2000, pp 65–70.CrossRef

McGlynn E, Asch S, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa022615.CrossRefPubMed

Runciman W, Hunt T, Hannaford N, et al. Caretrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197(2):100–5. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.10510.CrossRefPubMed

Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. 2nd ed. UK: Oxford Univ Press; 2017.CrossRef

Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Alexiou G, Gouvias T, et al. Life cycle of translational research for medical interventions. Science. 2008;321(5894):1298–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160622.CrossRefPubMed

Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9.CrossRefPubMed

Green L. Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Pract. 2008;25(suppl_1):i20–i4, https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn055.CrossRefPubMed

Mitchell S, Chambers D. Leveraging implementation science to improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes. J Oncol Pract. 2007;13(8):523–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2017.024729.CrossRef

Joyce C, Schneider M, Stevans JM, et al. Improving physical therapy pain care, quality, and cost through effectiveness-implementation research. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):447–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy031.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Livet M, Haines ST, Curran GM, et al. Implementation science to advance care delivery: a primer for pharmacists and other health professionals. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38(5):490–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2114.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Neta G, Sanchez M, Chambers D, et al. Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the national cancer institute and future directions. Implement Sci. 2015;10:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0200-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL, Dzewaltowski DA, et al. Sustainability of evidence-based community-based physical activity programs for older adults: lessons from active for life. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(2):208–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0039-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Harden SM, Johnson SB, Almeida FA, et al. Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Eakin EG, Hayes SC, Haas MR, et al. Healthy living after cancer: a dissemination and implementation study evaluating a telephone-delivered healthy lifestyle program for cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):992. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2003-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Matthews L, Kirk A, McCullum M, et al. The feasibility of a physical activity intervention for adults within routine diabetes care: a process evaluation. Pract Diabetes. 2017;34 (1 January/February 2017).CrossRef

16.

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-0005(97)80013-4.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Damschroder L, Aaron D, Keith R, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Durlak J, DuPre E. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):327–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, et al. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. 2nd ed. UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2013.CrossRef

22.

Beedie C, Mann S, Jimenez A, et al. Death by effectiveness: exercise as medicine caught in the efficacy trap! Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(6):323–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094389.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ried-Larsen M, MacDonald CS, Johansen MY, et al. Why prescribe exercise as therapy in type 2 diabetes? We have a pill for that! Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(5):2999. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2999.CrossRef

24.

Gates AB, Kerry R, Moffatt F, et al. Movement for movement: exercise as everybody’s business? Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(10):767–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096857.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Santa Mina D, Alibhai SMH, Matthew AG, et al. Exercise in clinical cancer care: a call to action and program development description. Curr Oncol. 2012;19(3):9. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.912.CrossRef

26.

Neubeck L, Freedman SB, Clark AM, et al. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):494–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711409326.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Dennett AM, Peiris CL, Shields N, et al. Exercise therapy in oncology rehabilitation in australia: a mixed-methods study. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016;13(5):e515–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12642.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Dalzell MA, Smirnow N, Sateren W, et al. Rehabilitation and exercise oncology program: translating research into a model of care. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(3):e191–8. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3498.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Glasziou P, Straus S, Brownlee S, et al. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017;390(10090):167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30946-1.CrossRef

30.

Eccles M, Mittman B. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.CrossRefPubMedCentral

31.

Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Sanson-Fisher R, D’Este C, Carey M, et al. Evaluation of systems-oriented public health interventions: alternative research designs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):9–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182445.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, et al. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Palinkas LA. Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(6):851–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.910791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Tabak R, Khoong E, Chambers D, et al. Models in dissemination and implementation research: useful tools in public health services and systems research. Front Public Health Serv Syst Res. 2013;2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.13023/fphssr.0201.08.CrossRef

39.

Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Estabrooks PA, Brownson RC, Pronk NP. Dissemination and implementation science for public health professionals: an overview and call to action. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:e162. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180525.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the re-aim framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, et al. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Stevenson L, Ball S, Haverhals LM, et al. Evaluation of a national telemedicine initiative in the veterans health administration: factors associated with successful implementation. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(3):168–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x16677676.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Reardon CM, Robinson CH, Damschroder LJ, et al. Implementation evaluation of the telephone lifestyle coaching (TLC) program: organizational factors associated with successful implementation. Transl Behav Med. 2016;7(2):233–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0424-6.CrossRefPubMedCentral

47.

Consolidated framework for implementation research. 2018. http://www.cfirguide.org/index.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.

48.

Matthews A, Jones N, Thomas A, et al. An education programme influencing health professionals to recommend exercise to their type 2 diabetes patients—understanding the processes: a case study from Oxfordshire, UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2040-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

McIntosh N, Fix GM, Allsup K, et al. A qualitative study of participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs in an integrated health care system. Mil Med. 2017;182(9–10):e1757–63. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-17-00053.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Cairney J, McGannon KR, Atkinson M. Exercise is medicine: critical considerations in the qualitative research landscape. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2018;10(4):391–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2018.1476010.CrossRef

51.

Beidas RS, Paciotti B, Barg F, et al. A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an evidence-based exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014;2014(50):338–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu033.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Chambers DA, Norton WE. The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(4 Suppl 2):S124–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Quiñones MM, Lombard-Newell J, Sharp D, et al. Case study of an adaptation and implementation of a diabetes prevention program for individuals with serious mental illness. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx064.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Lederman O, Suetani S, Stanton R, et al. Embedding exercise interventions as routine mental health care: implementation strategies in residential, inpatient and community settings. Australas Psychiatry. 2017;25(5):451–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856217711054.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Matthews E, Cowman M, Denieffe S. Using experience-based co-design for the development of physical activity provision in rehabilitation and recovery mental health care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017;24(7):545–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12401.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Avery L, Charman SJ, Taylor L, et al. Systematic development of a theory-informed multifaceted behavioural intervention to increase physical activity of adults with type 2 diabetes in routine primary care: movement as medicine for type 2 diabetes. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0459-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Granger C, Parry SM, Denehy L, et al. Evidence, education and multi-disciplinary integration are needed to embed exercise into lung cancer clinical care: a qualitative study involving physiotherapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(11):852–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1425939.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Segar M, Guérin E, Phillips E, et al. From a vital sign to vitality: selling exercise so patients want to buy it. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2016;1(11):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000015.CrossRef

59.

Cormie P. Ex-med cancer. 2018. http://www.exmedcancer.org.au/. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.

60.

Cormie P. Exmed cancer pd. Melbourne, Australia. 2018. https://exmedcancerpd.learnbook.com.au/ Accessed 30 May 2018.

61.

Stoutenberg M, Galaviz KI, Lobelo F, et al. A pragmatic application of the RE-AIM framework for evaluating the implementation of physical activity as a standard of care in health systems. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:e54. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Becker-Haimes EM, Williams NJ, Okamura KH, et al. Interactions between clinician and organizational characteristics to predict cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapy use. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00959-6.CrossRef

63.

Greenhalgh T. How to implement evidence-based healthcare. Hoboken: Wiley; 2017.

64.

Grace SL, Angevaare KL, Reid RD, et al. Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient strategies in increasing referral and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation: a prospective, multi-site study. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Fibbins H, editor. Keeping our staff in mind: Improving cardiometabolic risk and physical fitness of mental health staff through a physical activity intervention. Society of Mental Health Research Conference; 2017; Canberra, Australia.

66.

Chor KHB, Wisdom JP, Olin S-CS, et al. Measures for predictors of innovation adoption. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):545–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0551-7.CrossRef

67.

Aarons GA, Green AE, Willging CE, et al. Mixed-method study of a conceptual model of evidence-based intervention sustainment across multiple public-sector service settings. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0183-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Furness T, Hewavasam J, Barnfield J, et al. Adding an accredited exercise physiologist role to a new model of care at a secure extended care mental health service: a qualitative study. J Ment Health. 2018;27(2):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1294744.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Miller S, Mandrusiak A, Adsett J. Getting to the heart of the matter: what is the landscape of exercise rehabilitation for people with heart failure in Australia? Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(11):1350–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.016.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Young HML, Smith AC, Churchward DR, et al. Implementing a theory-based intradialytic exercise programme in practice: a quality improvement project. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11(6):832–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy050.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, et al. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(3):167–89. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21265.CrossRef

72.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in adults. Quality standard (QS6) 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs6. Accessed 22 Aug 2019.

73.

Leach HJ, Danyluk JM, Culos-Reed SN. Design and implementation of a community-based exercise program for breast cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(5):267–71. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2079.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Demark-Wahnefried W, Schmitz KH, Alfano CM, et al. Weight management and physical activity throughout the cancer care continuum. Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):64–89. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21441.CrossRef

75.

NSW Government. Physical health care within mental health services. 2017. https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/PD2017_033.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

76.

Mental Health Commission of NSW. Physical health and mental wellbeing: Evidence guide. 2016. https://nswmentalhealthcommission.com.au/resources/physical-health-and-mental-wellbeing-an-evidence-guide. Accessed 27 Nov 2017.

77.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Treatment and management. London, UK: NICE; 2014.

78.

Murgitroyd E, Fraser S, Hebson A, et al. Implementation of a supervised exercise therapy programme. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101(1):7–13.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Hempel S, O’Hanlon C, Lim YW, et al. Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0929-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Santa Mina D, Petrella A, Currie KL, et al. Enablers and barriers in delivery of a cancer exercise program: the Canadian experience. Curr Oncol. 2015;22(6):374–84. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2650.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Bäck M, Öberg B, Krevers B. Important aspects in relation to patients’ attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation—facilitators, barriers and physiotherapist’s role: a qualitative study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0512-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Shields CA, Fowles JR, Dunbar P, et al. Increasing diabetes educators’ confidence in physical activity and exercise counselling: the effectiveness of the “physical activity and exercise toolkit” training intervention. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37(6):381–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.08.265.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Clark RE, McArthur C, Papaioannou A, et al. “I do not have time. Is there a handout I can use?”: Combining physicians’ needs and behavior change theory to put physical activity evidence into practice. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(6):1953–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3975-6.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Salbach NM, Howe J-A, Baldry D, et al. Considerations for expanding community exercise programs incorporating a healthcare-recreation partnership for people with balance and mobility limitations: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3313-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

86.

Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, et al. Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research agenda. Front Public Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Johnson P, Raterink G. Implementation of a diabetes clinic-in-a-clinic project in a family practice setting: using the plan, do, study, act model. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(14):2096–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02774.x.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Finlayson M, Cattaneo D, Cameron M, et al. Applying the re-aim framework to inform the development of a multiple sclerosis falls-prevention intervention. Int J MS Care. 2014;16(4):192–7. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

89.

Koorts H, Eakin E, Estabrooks P, et al. Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0678-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

Kimmel GT, Haas BK, Hermanns M. The role of exercise in cancer treatment: bridging the gap. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2016;1(17):152–8. https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000022.CrossRef

91.

Hoekstra F, Alingh RA, van der Schans CP, et al. Design of a process evaluation of the implementation of a physical activity and sports stimulation programme in Dutch rehabilitation setting: respact. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0127-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

92.

Mewes JC, Steuten LMG, Ijsbrandy C, et al. Value of implementation of strategies to increase the adherence of health professionals and cancer survivors to guideline-based physical exercise. Value Health. 2017;20(10):1336–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.013.CrossRefPubMed

93.

Gyurcsik NC, Brittain DR. Partial examination of the public health impact of the people with arthritis can exercise (PACE^®) program: reach, adoption, and maintenance. Public Health Nurs. 2006;23(6):516–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00591.x.CrossRefPubMed

94.

Proctor E, Luke D, Calhoun A, et al. Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0274-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Proctor E, Powell B, McMillen J. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

96.

Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. Br Med J. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258.CrossRef

97.

Slade S, Keating J. Exercise prescription: a case for standardised reporting. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(16):1110–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090290.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Slade SC, Cup E, Feehan L, et al. Consensus on exercise reporting template (CERT): modified delphi study. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1514–24. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150668.CrossRefPubMed

99.

McCrabb S, Lane C, Hall A, et al. Scaling-up evidence-based obesity interventions: a systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale-up penalty. Obes Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12845.CrossRefPubMed

100.

Library C. Cochrane effective practice and organisation of care. 2018. https://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-taxonomy. Accessed 11 Dec 2018.

101.

Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (V1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

103.

Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science
verfasst von: Louise Czosnek
Nicole Rankin
Eva Zopf
Justin Richards
Simon Rosenbaum
Prue Cormie
Publikationsdatum: 20.11.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01228-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Reply to: “Comment on: The Effect of Nordic Hamstring Exercise Intervention Volume on Eccentric Strength and Muscle Architecture Adaptations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses”

DNA Damage Following Acute Aerobic Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Use of Compositional Data Analysis to Show Estimated Changes in Cardiometabolic Health by Reallocating Time to Light-Intensity Physical Activity in Older Adults

Corrections to: The Effect of Nordic Hamstring Exercise Intervention Volume on Eccentric Strength and Muscle Architecture Adaptations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application

Exercise as Medicine for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Meta-review of the Benefits for Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes