Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2016

27.04.2016

In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

verfasst von: Ely R. Felker, Stephanie A. Lee-Felker, John Feller, Daniel J. Margolis, David S. Lu, Robert Princenthal, Stuart May, Martin Cohen, Jiaoti Huang, Jeffrey Yoshida, Bernadette Greenwood, Hyun J. Kim, Steven S. Raman

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the safety and efficacy of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGB) for detection of clinically significant disease (CSD) in untreated men with known or suspected prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

512 patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) followed by MRGB at one of three centers in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. Exclusion criteria were prior prostate cancer therapy and incomplete Mp-MRI (n = 51). Patients (n = 461) were analyzed in two subcohorts: no prior PCa (NP) (n = 381) and active surveillance (AS) (n = 80). Detection rates of PCa and CSD (Gleason Score ≥3 + 4) were calculated and compared among subcohorts and by Mp-MRI assessment grade. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for detection of PCa and CSD.

Results

Mean patient age was 66 years, median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.5 ng/mL, and median prostate volume was 54 cc. A mean of 1.7 targets was sampled per gland. Significant adverse events (urosepsis and hematuria with obstruction) occurred in 1% (5/461). Overall PCa detection rates were 51% per patient (233/461) and 37% per lesion (282/757). 65% (151/233) of men with detected PCa had CSD. Per-patient PCa detection rates in the NP and AS subcohorts were 47% (178/381) and 69% (55/80), respectively, significantly higher in the AS group (p < 0.001). CSD was detected in 10% (47/451), 43% (96/225) and 84% (68/81) of lesions with Mp-MRI assessment grades of 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Older age, higher PSA, and lower prostate volume predicted MRGB detection of CSD (OR 1.07 and p = 0.003, OR 1.1 and p = 0.014, and OR 0.98 and p = 0.032, respectively).

Conclusions

In-bore MRGB is safe and high yield for detection of CSD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59(4):225–249CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 59(4):225–249CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2011) Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol. 186(5):1830–1834CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2011) Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol. 186(5):1830–1834CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1989) Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol. 142(1):66–70PubMed Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1989) Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol. 142(1):66–70PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. (2001) Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 166(5):1679–1683CrossRefPubMed Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. (2001) Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 166(5):1679–1683CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, et al. (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer. 112(8):1650–1659CrossRefPubMed Dall’Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, et al. (2008) Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature. Cancer. 112(8):1650–1659CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. (2013) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 189(1 Suppl):S12–S17 (discussion S7–8)CrossRefPubMed Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, et al. (2013) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 189(1 Suppl):S12–S17 (discussion S7–8)CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegde JV, Mulkern RV, Panych LP, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 37(5):1035–1054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hegde JV, Mulkern RV, Panych LP, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 37(5):1035–1054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. (2007) The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int. 99(4):786–793CrossRefPubMed Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. (2007) The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int. 99(4):786–793CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron D, Carroll P, Coakley F (2008) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future. Curr Opin Urol. 18(1):71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron D, Carroll P, Coakley F (2008) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future. Curr Opin Urol. 18(1):71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D, et al. (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol. 176(6 Pt 1):2432–2437CrossRefPubMed Villers A, Puech P, Mouton D, et al. (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol. 176(6 Pt 1):2432–2437CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, et al. (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 241(2):449–458CrossRefPubMed Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, et al. (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 241(2):449–458CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haker SJ, Mulkern RV, Roebuck JR, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance-guided prostate interventions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 16(5):355–368CrossRefPubMed Haker SJ, Mulkern RV, Roebuck JR, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance-guided prostate interventions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 16(5):355–368CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, et al. (2005) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology. 234(2):576–581CrossRefPubMed Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, et al. (2005) MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology. 234(2):576–581CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 186(4):1281–1285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 186(4):1281–1285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Natarajan S, Marks LS, Margolis DJ, et al. (2011) Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol. 29(3):334–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Natarajan S, Marks LS, Margolis DJ, et al. (2011) Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol. 29(3):334–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 189(3):860–866CrossRefPubMed Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 189(3):860–866CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson AW, Harvey RC, Parker RA, et al. (2013) Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy. PLoS One. 8(2):e57480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson AW, Harvey RC, Parker RA, et al. (2013) Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy. PLoS One. 8(2):e57480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 68:8–19CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdi H, Pourmalek F, Zargar H, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Urology. 85(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed Abdi H, Pourmalek F, Zargar H, et al. (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Urology. 85(2):423–428CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu JC, Chang E, Natarajan S, et al. (2014) Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply? J Urol. 192(2):385–390CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hu JC, Chang E, Natarajan S, et al. (2014) Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply? J Urol. 192(2):385–390CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Somford DM, van Oort IM, et al. (2014) Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Invest Radiol. 49(3):165–172CrossRefPubMed Hoeks CM, Somford DM, van Oort IM, et al. (2014) Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Invest Radiol. 49(3):165–172CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2015) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2015) PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 69:16–40CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, et al. (2013) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol. 189(1):86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, et al. (2013) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol. 189(1):86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bastian PJ, Mangold LA, Epstein JI, Partin AW (2004) Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer. 101(9):2001–2005PubMed Bastian PJ, Mangold LA, Epstein JI, Partin AW (2004) Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis. Cancer. 101(9):2001–2005PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter HB, et al. (1993) The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 150(1):110–114PubMed Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter HB, et al. (1993) The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 150(1):110–114PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, et al. (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol. 186(2):458–464CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, et al. (2011) Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy. J Urol. 186(2):458–464CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. (2002) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 95(2):281CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. (2002) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 95(2):281CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, et al. (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol. 64(4):544–552CrossRefPubMed Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S, et al. (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol. 64(4):544–552CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten MG, Hoeks CM, Bomers JG, et al. (2015) Location of prostate cancers determined by multiparametric and mri-guided biopsy in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen level and at least one negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 205(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed Schouten MG, Hoeks CM, Bomers JG, et al. (2015) Location of prostate cancers determined by multiparametric and mri-guided biopsy in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen level and at least one negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 205(1):57–63CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Franiel T, Stephan C, Erbersdobler A, et al. (2011) Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding–multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology. 259(1):162–172CrossRefPubMed Franiel T, Stephan C, Erbersdobler A, et al. (2011) Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding–multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology. 259(1):162–172CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C, et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 183(2):520–527CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C, et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 183(2):520–527CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat de Rooij M, Crienen S, Witjes JA, et al. (2014) Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. Eur Urol. 66(3):430–436CrossRefPubMed de Rooij M, Crienen S, Witjes JA, et al. (2014) Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. Eur Urol. 66(3):430–436CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Roethke M, Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M, et al. (2012) MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol. 30(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed Roethke M, Anastasiadis AG, Lichy M, et al. (2012) MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol. 30(2):213–218CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U, et al. (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol. 50(4):738–748CrossRefPubMed Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U, et al. (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol. 50(4):738–748CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B, et al. (2006) Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol. 16(6):1237–1243CrossRefPubMed Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B, et al. (2006) Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol. 16(6):1237–1243CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG, et al. (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol. 62(5):902–909CrossRefPubMed Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG, et al. (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol. 62(5):902–909CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Penzkofer T, Tuncali K, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. Radiology. 274(1):170–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Penzkofer T, Tuncali K, Fedorov A, et al. (2015) Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. Radiology. 274(1):170–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
verfasst von
Ely R. Felker
Stephanie A. Lee-Felker
John Feller
Daniel J. Margolis
David S. Lu
Robert Princenthal
Stuart May
Martin Cohen
Jiaoti Huang
Jeffrey Yoshida
Bernadette Greenwood
Hyun J. Kim
Steven S. Raman
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0750-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Abdominal Radiology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.