Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2019

27.07.2018 | Original Article

Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

verfasst von: Richa Sharma, MS, Amita Suneja

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of the Study

Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception having least number of complications. We aimed to find the incidence, risk factors and the management done for incarcerated and transmigrated intrauterine contraceptive devices at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital during past 5 years.

Methods

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 5 years (January 2013–December 2017) was done, and the case records from Medical Record Department and Family Planning Unit of our institution were analysed.

Results

Total number of IUCD insertions done in last 5 years (from January 2013 to December 2017) in our institution was 4557. Misplaced IUCDs requiring surgical interventions were 71 (1.6%) out of which 63 (88.7%) were incomplete perforations or embedded and 8 (11.3%) were complete perforations or transmigrated IUCDs. Transmigration sites were omentum, uterovesical fold, mesentery and bladder. Laparotomy was needed in 4 (5.6%), and 2 (2.8%) needed each laparoscopy and cystoscopy. Main risk factors identified were postpartum previous on or two caesarean sections, low parity, grade of operator and IUCD and uterocervical length discrepancy.

Conclusion

The risk of perforation should not be a reason to defer IUCD insertion and every effort should be made to bring down its failure and complication rates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):184–96.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):184–96.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstuck N. Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(3):130–9.PubMed Goldstuck N. Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012;16(3):130–9.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Health. 2014;6:735–44. Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Health. 2014;6:735–44.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, et al. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–9.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, et al. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:811–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell HD. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Acess J Contracept. 2016;7:19–32.CrossRef Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell HD. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Acess J Contracept. 2016;7:19–32.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Varun N, Nigam A, Gupta N. Misplaced IUCD: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):5155–7.CrossRef Varun N, Nigam A, Gupta N. Misplaced IUCD: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):5155–7.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar H, Sharma P, Aggarwal B. Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion into sigmoid colon. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(5):1828–30.CrossRef Kumar H, Sharma P, Aggarwal B. Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion into sigmoid colon. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(5):1828–30.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal S, Goyal S. Displaced intrauterine device: a retrospective study. J Med Res. 2016;2(2):41–3. Goyal S, Goyal S. Displaced intrauterine device: a retrospective study. J Med Res. 2016;2(2):41–3.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Armo M, Minj IB, Triki AR, et al. Copper T (380 A) and risk of uterine perforation in lactating women: rural scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):3026–9.CrossRef Armo M, Minj IB, Triki AR, et al. Copper T (380 A) and risk of uterine perforation in lactating women: rural scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(7):3026–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, et al. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1014–20.CrossRefPubMed Braaten KP, Benson CB, Maurer R, et al. Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1014–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers and Nursing Personnel September 2013. Family Planning Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India. IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers and Nursing Personnel September 2013. Family Planning Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India.
Metadaten
Titel
Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis
verfasst von
Richa Sharma, MS
Amita Suneja
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2018
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1159-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.