Increased circulating bioactive C-type natriuretic peptide is associated with reduced heart rate variability in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-known potent risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease [1, 2]. Individuals with CKD are more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than to progress to end-stage renal disease [3]. The mechanisms underpinning this increased cardiovascular risk in CKD are complex and remain to be fully elucidated. A variety of non-traditional risk factors, as well as traditional ones, have been recognized to be involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular injury in CKD [4]. An extensive understanding of the non-traditional factors participating in the modulation of cardiovascular system may therefore provide novel strategy for cardiovascular protection in CKD patients.

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is a cardiovascular bioactive hormone of the natriuretic peptide family and shares structure homology with the other two cardiac peptide, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) [5]. It is encoded by the Nppc gene on chromosome 2 and is most widely expressed in the brain and endothelial cells [6]. It is synthesized as a 126 aa peptide (Prepro-CNP) and is converted to the NT-proCNP by removal of the signal peptide. The NT-proCNP is cleaved by furin to yield CNP-53, which is then processed further to yield the bioactive form, CNP-22 [5]. Previous work investigating the biological function of CNP has revealed an important role for it in maintaining vascular homeostasis and blood pressure regulation [7, 8]. It can also act as a cardiac inotropic and chronotropic agent [9, 10]. To be noted, the biological activity of CNP are thought to be exerted in a paracrine or autocrine fashion due to the low circulating level. However, recent clinical studies have identified alteration of plasma CNP level in patients with heart failure [11, 12] and have demonstrated a link between elevated plasma CNP and increased risk of myocardial infarction in the general population [13]. These data indicate that circulating CNP is also involved in cardiovascular modulation and diseases.

Although ANP and BNP have been extensively studied in patients with kidney disease, there is a paucity of data regarding CNP and its relationship to cardiovascular alteration in CKD. Questions remain to be answered include: (1) is plasma CNP accumulated as renal function declines? (2) is there any association of circulating bioactive CNP-22 with cardiovascular alteration in CKD patients? To answer the questions, we conducted the current cross-sectional study. We measured plasma CNP-22 in a group of non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients and explore its association with (1) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and (2) several cardiovascular measures which were chosen based on prior experimental evidence, including blood pressure, endothelial function, arterial elasticity and heart rate variability (HRV).

A total of 76 patients participated in the current study. General characteristics of the study patients are presented in Table 1. Mean (±standard deviation) age of the patients were 59.9 (±14.9) years and 56.6% were male. Diabetic kidney disease and glomerulonephritis were the leading causes of CKD in these patients. Mean eGFR was 41.4 (±25.4) ml/min/1.73m² and 42.1% patients had a previous history of cardiovascular disease. Average plasma CNP level was 790.8 ± 309.1 pg/ml. To evaluate whether renal dysfunction is associated with altered circulating CNP level, we compared plasma CNP concentration in different CKD stages as shown in Fig. 1. Mean plasma CNP was 755.0 (±370.7) pg/ml, 791.9 (±314.7) pg/ml and 828.2 (±211.9) pg/ml in patients with stage 1-2 CKD, stage 3-4 CKD and stage 5ND CKD, respectively. There was no significant difference between each group (p = 0.84).

Endothelial cells are the primary source of circulating CNP in humans. We therefore explored whether patients with endothelial dysfunction exhibit reduced plasma CNP level (Fig. 2). The results indicate that plasma CNP level was comparable between patients with or without endothelial dysfunction (with vs. without endothelial dysfunction: 844.6 ± 365.5 pg/ml vs. 738.3 ± 231.8 pg/ml, p = 0.14).

Cardiovascular evaluation results are presented in Table 2 and their relationships to plasma CNP was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation analysis. CNP showed no significant correlation with systolic or diastolic blood pressure, cfPWV or crPWV and RHI, whereas it was correlated positively with heart rate (r = 0.23, p = 0.04) and negatively with SDNN (r = − 0.33, p = 0.004), RMSSD (r = − 0.27, p = 0.02) and triangular index (r = − 0.33, p = 0.005) (all HRV parameters were logarithm transformed in Pearson’s correlation analyses).

The correlation analysis gave a clue that circulating CNP is associated with altered HRV, rather than vascular homeostasis indices in CKD patients. We hence sought to confirm the associations between CNP and HRV parameters using multiple linear regression analysis with adjustment for several covariates, including age, sex, eGFR, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, current smoker, previous history of cardiovascular diseases, hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure. As shown in Table 3, CNP remained significantly associated with logarithm transformed SDNN, RMSSD and triangular index after adjustment (SDNN: ß = − 0.12, p = 0.003; RMSSD: ß = − 0.11, p = 0.02; Triangular index: ß = − 0.08, p = 0.004; all ß were calculated per SD increment of CNP). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with coronary artery disease (n = 9), the associations remained essentially unchanged (Additional file 1: Table S1).

In the current study, we explored the associations of plasma bioactive CNP with renal function and the cardiovascular system in a group of CKD patients. Our major findings are as following: (1) Increased plasma CNP was associated with reduced HRV; (2) Decreased renal function was not associated with elevated plasma CNP level; (3) Circulating CNP was not reduced in patients with endothelial dysfunction compared to those with preserved endothelial function; (4) There was no association between plasma CNP and blood pressure or arterial elasticity (neither central or peripheral).

Besides several negative results, we found a significant association of increased plasma CNP with elevated heart rate and reduced HRV. The positive association of CNP with heart rate is in accordance with the chronotropic effect of CNP found in both clinical and experimental settings. Cheung et al. also noted a significant correlation between CNP and heart rate in hypertensive subjects [18]. Moreover, they measured plasma noradrenaline and found a positive association of plasma CNP with noradrenaline. In the study by Igaki et al., intravenous administration of CNP induced an increase of heart rate in healthy subjects [19]. The work by Beaulieu et al. shed light on the underlying mechanism as they found that CNP can increase the maximal depolarization rate during diastole and decrease the action potential duration of repolarization in dogs [10].

The significant and negative association between CNP and HRV in the patients as revealed by our data is very interesting. Since reduced HRV has been proved to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events [20], our data may therefore provide insights into the underpinning mechanism of the link between elevated circulating CNP and increased cardiovascular risk in the general population [13]. To the best of our knowledge, our data for the first time show a relationship between CNP and altered HRV in humans and can be interpreted in combination with data from previous experimental settings. In a recent study using a transgenic rat model with neuron-specific overexpression of a dominant negative NPR-B receptor, Buttgereit et al. showed that CNP signaling via the NPR-B receptor is sympathoinhibitory [21]. Noteworthy,overall HRV as assessed by SDNN was reduced in the transgenic rats while LF/HF was increased. In addition, Moyes et al. found increased LF/HF in female endothelial-specific CNP knock-out mouse with no significant change in SDNN [7]. We observed a negative association of CNP with time-domain indices (SDNN, RMSSD, Triangular index) and no association with LF/HF in CKD patients. Our finding may be a reflection of increased CNP production compensating for autonomic dysfunction in the patients. However, a direct effect of circulating CNP on autonomic regulation can also be possible. The exact explanation remains to be fully elucidated.

Due to increased stimuli and possible reduced renal clearance, plasma natriuretic peptides, including ANP and BNP are generally elevated in patients with impaired kidney function [22‐24]. However, in our study, we did not observe an association between plasma CNP and eGFR in patients with CKD. The absence of an association between CNP and eGFR in our study is consistent with a previous report by Sangaralingham et al., in which the authors found no association between CNP and eGFR in the general population [13]. There are two possible explanations for this distinctive characteristic of CNP. First, the production of CNP may be less potent than ANP and BNP in the context of renal dysfunction. ANP and BNP production are mainly stimulated by increased atrial or ventricular wall tension, which is common in CKD patients due to accumulated extracellular fluid volume and elevated blood pressure, whereas CNP expression regulation remains obscure and has been linked to sheer stress on endothelial cells and cytokines [25, 26]. However, several studies have noted a negative association between NT-proCNP, the propeptide without biological activity, with eGFR [11, 27‐29]. Given that no arteriovenous gradient of NT-proCNP was seen across renal tissue, it seems that CNP production, at least at the propeptide level, is also increased in CKD patients. Second, CNP is cleared in the circulation primarily in a kidney-independent fashion. It can be either hydrolyzed by the neutral endopeptidase or bind to the natriuretic peptide receptor-C to be internalized and degraded [30, 31]. The clearance of CNP in the circulation is very rapid with a half-life of only 2.6 min [32]. This may also explain that why NT-proCNP, but not CNP, is associated with renal function. To be noted, a previous study observed a negative arteriovenous CNP gradient across renal tissue in humans [27]. This implies that the kidney can also contribute to the clearance of CNP, though may to a less important role.

The endothelium is the primary secretion site of CNP in peripheral tissues [33]. Mice with endothelial-specific knockout of the CNP encoding gene, Nppc, exhibited elevated blood pressure, as well as endothelial dysfunction and impaired endothelial-dependent vascular relaxation capacity [7, 8]. However, we did not detect a difference in circulating CNP level between patients with endothelial dysfunction and those without. Furthermore, there is also no association of plasma CNP with blood pressure or pulse wave velocity. The lack of a link between circulating CNP and measurements of vascular homeostasis in our study seems to support the questioned notion that the hemodynamic regulation actions of CNP are paracrine or autocrine, instead of endocrine [19, 34]. This is in line with the findings that polymorphism of the CNP gene was an independent predictor of development of hypertension in a Japanese population but plasma CNP was not increased in hypertensive subjects compared with normotensive controls [18, 35].

Several limitations of our study should be pointed out for proper interpretation of our results. First, due to the cross-sectional design, we cannot draw any causative conclusion. Second, our findings may be somewhat limited by the small sample size and need to be confirmed in population-based studies. The lack of healthy controls in the current study leaves the question that whether CNP level differs between individuals with and without CKD unsolved. Third, more detailed cardiac evaluations, e.g. echocardiography or cardiac injury biomarker measurements, were lacking in our study, limiting our ability to explore the association of CNP with cardiac function and injury. Nevertheless, our study remains a first step in evaluating the link between circulating CNP and the cardiovascular system in patents with CKD and can offer indications for further exploration.

In summary, in a group of patients with CKD, reduced renal function was not associated with elevated plasma CNP. Circulating CNP showed no association with blood pressure, endothelial function or arterial elasticity. There was a significant association between elevated CNP with reduced HRV. Our data highlights a possible link between circulating CNP and autonomic dysfunction in CKD patients. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms underlying this association, as well as evaluate the ability of circulating CNP in predicting adverse cardiovascular event in CKD patients.