Influence of anaemia in severely injured patients on mortality, transfusion and length of stay: an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU^®

Anaemia remains one of the leading causes of death in severely injured patients [1]. It can be both acute, caused by massive haemorrhage, and/or chronic at the time of admission [2]. Besides trauma-related coagulopathy, hypothermia, haemodilution and shock, anaemia therapy represents a key aspect in the treatment of severely injured patients. Furthermore, anaemia impacts patients’ clinical outcomes and contributes to the costs associated with trauma [3]. Acute anaemia often requires the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) [4]. However, blood transfusions have shown to be an independent predictor for mortality, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [5, 6].

The spectrum of patients, the outcome in trauma patients and the mechanism of trauma are diverse, ranging from common head and thoracic injuries to abdominal and pelvic injuries [7]. Patients with combined injuries or without head involvement tend to be younger than patients with isolated head injuries [7]. Elderly trauma patients more often present with lower haemoglobin (Hb) levels in the emergency room (ER) and at discharge and more frequently receive transfusions of RBCs than younger patients [8]. Furthermore, the severity of anaemia at admission predicted 6-month mortality in geriatric patients [9]. Initial and lowest Hb after admission additionally predicted outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injuries [10]. Admission procedures take into account the particular importance of anaemia in severely injured patients via several prognostic scores, e.g. the 'Revised Injury Severity Classification' (RISC) II score [11].

This TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU) study analyses the incidence of anaemia and effects of anaemia on in-hospital mortality as well as on red blood cell transfusion and length of hospital stay. Further possible factors influencing anaemia will be analysed.

The main objective of this study is to analyse the anaemia rate on admission to the emergency department and the impact of anaemia on in-hospital mortality. In addition, the study also investigates the transfusion rate and in-hospital outcomes of critically injured patients.

The TraumaRegister DGU^® of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, DGU) was founded in 1993. The aim of this multi-centre database is the pseudonymised and standardised documentation of severely injured patients [12]. Participating hospitals are located in Germany (90%), Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia and the United Arab Emirates.

The register documents data from (1) the pre-hospital phase, (2) the ER, (3) ICU stays and (4) hospital discharge, including detailed information on patient demographics, the mechanism of trauma, comorbidities, pre- and in-hospital management, the course of treatment in the ICU, relevant laboratory findings, such as transfusion data, and final patient outcomes. Every patient whose ER admission results in death or a stay at the ICU of a participating trauma centre is included in the database.

The infrastructure for documentation, data management and data analysis are provided by the ‘AUC—Academy for Trauma Surgery’, a company affiliated with the DGU. Scientific leadership is provided by the DGU’s ‘Committee on Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care and Trauma Management (Sektion NIS)’. Scientific data analysis is approved according to a peer review procedure outlined in the publication’s guidelines for the TR-DGU. Approximately, 30,000 cases from more than 650 hospitals are currently registered into the database annually.

Participation in the TR-DGU is voluntary. However, for hospitals associated with TraumaNetzwerk DGU^®, the entry of at least a basic data set is mandatory as part of the quality management programme.

The present study is in line with the publication guidelines of the TraumaRegister DGU^® and registered under the TR-DGU project ID: 2020–054. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

A total of 67,595 severely injured patients (AIS ≥ 3) were analysed between 2015 and 2019. The demographic data and mechanism of trauma are shown in Table 1.

The mean ISS was 19.9 ± 10.3 in the non-anaemic, 28.9 ± 16.0 in the moderately anaemic and 33.6 ± 17.9 in the severely anaemic group. Trauma-related major bleeding score was higher with increasing anaemia level (NA 3.9 ± 3.4, MA 12.8 ± 4.4, SA 16.6 ± 4.7).

In this study, we revealed that in-hospital mortality and transfusion rates increased with the severity of anaemia and that anaemia was associated with prolonged Hospital-LOS [13]. Multivariable analyses revealed that severe and moderate anaemia are a risk factor for higher mortality.

Among trauma patients, anaemia remains one of the most common causes of death upon admission to the ER [1]. Massive haemorrhage due to severe trauma can cause acute anaemia. Severe anaemia in trauma patients is a consequence of a sustained severe injury, yet there was a higher OR for severe anaemia (OR 4.21) compared to other predictors such as shock, defined as systolic BP ≤ 90 mmHg, (OR 2.19), or penetrating trauma (OR 1.80). SA had a similar OR to severe head injury (AIS 5/6: OR 4.76), age over 70 years (OR 4.84–12.04) or unconsciousness at the scene (OR 4.83). These results are in line with the findings of Lefering et al., who also showed a significant influence (p < 0.001 OR 1.45) of traumatic anaemia on mortality with a haemoglobin limit value of less than 12 g/dl [11]. Froessler et al. revealed that anaemia increases mortality, LOS and costs associated with trauma management [3].

In the emergency setting, treatment usually involves RBC transfusions. RBC transfusions, in turn, are associated with greater mortality, an increased risk for SIRS and prolonged ICU and hospital stays [5, 6].

In summary, 67,595 injured patients were analysed. Both the mean Hb values and the distribution of Hb values from trauma patients are comparable to the German population in general [14]. Although this study included only severely injured patients with AIS scores ≥ 3, the majority of patients were admitted without anaemia to the ER. Pre-clinically applied volume resuscitation has an influence on patients’ Hb concentrations at the time of ER admission [15]. Pre-hospital mean volume resuscitation ranged from 500 mL for patients with high Hb values to a maximum of 1.5 L for patients with Hb values < 5 g/dl. These findings align with the current guidelines for pre-hospital trauma management [16]. According to data from the TraumaRegister DGU^®, volume resuscitation has become more restrictive during the last decade [15]. Our analysis demonstrated that patients with SA received a maximum of 1500 mL crystalloid volume, minimising the risk for haemodilution and coagulopathy. Thus, it can be assumed that the determined Hb values used for this analysis are both realistic and caused by haemorrhage and not by haemodilution.

The RBC transfusion rate in anaemic patients increased exponentially with decreasing Hb values. Patients with an Hb value of 8 g/dl showed signs of chronic anaemia in 40% of all registered cases, a finding that reflects the current prevalence of chronic anaemia in adults. Chronic anaemia is present in 17% of adults over 60 years and in 40% of elderly patients [17]. Because anaemia is associated with functional restrictions, limited mobility and decreased stability and balance, moreover, it also increases the risk for falls [18]. Laboratory values that are indicative of chronic anaemia, such as transferrin saturation, are not collected in the registry. Therefore, prospective studies are needed to further investigate the influence of chronic anaemia in trauma patients.

We found that anticoagulation in severely injured patients seemed not to be associated with anaemia. Compared to anaemic trauma patients, all trauma patients in our analysis had a similar distribution of anticoagulant medication. Neither of the different anticoagulation groups was associated with a greater risk for anaemia at admission. This result is surprising since the use of antiplatelet medications or anticoagulation is associated with an increased bleeding tendency and coagulopathy. It also increases the importance of point-of-care coagulation testing (POCT) in the ER. Based on the available data in this analysis, it shows that in severely injured patients with severe anaemia, POCT diagnostics were performed in 12.4% of cases. ASS impacts thrombocyte function, which can be rapidly diagnosed with viscoelastic measurements in the ER or during surgery [19]. Point-of-care analyses, such as viscoelastic measurements, platelet function tests or blood gas analysis, can enable the rapid detection of massive bleeding and, due to their quicker results and the smaller sample sizes required, should be favoured to laboratory testing. With a rapid turnaround time and minimal sample size, blood gas analysis has proven to be a valid measurement method for Hb values in the ER [20]. POCT must be part of patients’ blood management, ultimately improving the patient outcomes [21]. Due to the lack of haemodilution, results from this testing can be safely used for clinical decision-making.

Several studies have already demonstrated the increased mortality of anaemic patients [1]. Our study has reproduced these results for a cohort of severely injured patients. In our study, however, patients with SA tended to die rather quickly—in the ER or during the first 24 h after injury, while patients with MA more often survived the acute phase in the ER but died during emergency surgery or within 24 h of admission to the ICU. This raises the question of why patients with severe anaemia do not survive the ER despite the possibility of immediate massive transfusion. Thus, mass transfusion protocols have been established in trauma centres to ensure rapid and correct decisions in bleeding situations. However, it is known that massive haemorrhage can be treated specifically but can lead to several complications such as organ dysfunction or coagulopathy [22]. Considering the presumed causes of death of patients with severe anaemia, 40.6% were traumatic brain injury, 31.2% haemorrhage, 20.5% organ failure, and 7.7% other causes. This also shows in our analysis that severe haemorrhage is the presumed cause of death with almost one-third of the patients. As a recently published review points out, several factors need to be considered in the treatment of traumatic haemorrhage: early haemorrhage control, resuscitation efforts, and a more complete understanding of the pathophysiology of coagulopathy in trauma, sepsis, and MOF may lead to further reduction of mortality in trauma-induced haemorrhage [23].

The majority of severely injured patients are admitted without anaemia to the ER. Injury-associated moderate and severe anaemia is an independent predictor of mortality in severely injured patients.