Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019

16.07.2019 | Rhinology

Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food

verfasst von: Y. Zang, P. Han, S. Burghardt, A. Knaapila, V. Schriever, T. Hummel

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Eating-related problems are among the most frequent issues in olfactory impairment, causing a noticeable loss of quality of life for some of the affected persons. To what extent olfactory dysfunction impacts on the sensory perception of food is less explored. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food aromas, as well as the perception of the “basic tastes” salty, sour, sweet, and bitter.

Methods

Eighty-nine participants were recruited for the prospective study. Group 1 consisted of thoroughly examined patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 48, mean age = 60.0 years), group 2 consisted of people with normal olfactory function (n = 41, mean age = 50.4 years). First, olfactory and gustatory functions were assessed for all participants with the help of the “Sniffin’Sticks” battery and the “taste strips” test. Second, food odors were rated for their pleasantness, intensity, familiarity and desirability. Last, real food items were tasted orally and the intensity for basic taste qualities (sweet, bitter, salty, and sour) and pleasantness was rated. In addition, salivation was measured following exposure to the food odors.

Results

In comparison to controls, patients rated orthonasal food odors as less pleasant, intense, familiar, and less appetizing. “Taste strip” scores were significantly lower in patients (M = 9.56, SD = 2.76) as compared to controls (M = 10.88, SD = 1.89). In addition, ratings of food liking for chocolate and peanut were lower in patients compared to controls (chocolate: patients—M = 6.85, SD = 2.09, controls—M = 7.90, SD = 1.53; peanut: patients—M = 4.88, SD = 2.20, controls—M = 6.80, SD = 2.33). No significant differences were found regarding the comparison of the salivary flow rate in controls (M = 0.52 g/min, SD = 0.19) and patients (M = 0.50 SD = 0.17).

Conclusions

Changes in the perception of odors may change the perception of food with specific effects on food liking. Olfactory dysfunction affects gustatory function, indicating the central-nervous interaction between taste and smell. Still, olfactory dysfunction did not appear to affect patients’ salivary flow.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125(2):116–121CrossRef Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125(2):116–121CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144CrossRef Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brillat-Savarin JA. La Physiologie du Goût ("Die Physiologie des Geschmacks oder Transcendentalgastronomische Betrachtungen, German 1865; translater Habs R, corrected Muehlgassner J) Edited by Leipzig, Philipp Reclam jun., 1826, p. chapter 8 Brillat-Savarin JA. La Physiologie du Goût ("Die Physiologie des Geschmacks oder Transcendentalgastronomische Betrachtungen, German 1865; translater Habs R, corrected Muehlgassner J) Edited by Leipzig, Philipp Reclam jun., 1826, p. chapter 8
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118(1):135–144CrossRef Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118(1):135–144CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Croy Ilona, Nordin Steven (2014) Hummel T, Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194CrossRef Croy Ilona, Nordin Steven (2014) Hummel T, Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kremer Stefanie, Holthuysen Nancy, Boesveldt Sanne (2014) The influence of olfactory impairment in vital, independently living older persons on their eating behaviour and food liking. Food Qual Prefer 38:30–39CrossRef Kremer Stefanie, Holthuysen Nancy, Boesveldt Sanne (2014) The influence of olfactory impairment in vital, independently living older persons on their eating behaviour and food liking. Food Qual Prefer 38:30–39CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Proserpio C, de Graaf C, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Boesveldt S (2017) Impact of ambient odors on food intake, saliva production and appetite ratings. Physiol Behav 174:35–41CrossRef Proserpio C, de Graaf C, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Boesveldt S (2017) Impact of ambient odors on food intake, saliva production and appetite ratings. Physiol Behav 174:35–41CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bender G, Hummel T, Negoias S, Small DM (2009) Separate signals for orthonasal vs retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav Neurosci 123(3):481–489CrossRef Bender G, Hummel T, Negoias S, Small DM (2009) Separate signals for orthonasal vs retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav Neurosci 123(3):481–489CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G, (1997) ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22(1):39–52CrossRef Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G, (1997) ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22(1):39–52CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1241CrossRef Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1241CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bult JH, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10CrossRef Bult JH, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A et al (2009) "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248CrossRef Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A et al (2009) "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, Van Boekel M, Luning P (2014) Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity. 38(5):650CrossRef Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, Van Boekel M, Luning P (2014) Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity. 38(5):650CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35(1):3–20CrossRef Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35(1):3–20CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, et al. (2016) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 56(1):0. Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, et al. (2016) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 56(1):0.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudziol H, Rahneberg K, Burkert S (2007) Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons. Laryngo- rhino- otologie. 86(9):640–643CrossRef Gudziol H, Rahneberg K, Burkert S (2007) Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons. Laryngo- rhino- otologie. 86(9):640–643CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C et al (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257(8):1303–1308CrossRef Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C et al (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257(8):1303–1308CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd GM (2006) Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117):316–321CrossRef Shepherd GM (2006) Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117):316–321CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzola L, Royet JP, Catenoix H, Montavont A, Isnard J, Mauguiere F (2017) Gustatory and olfactory responses to stimulation of the human insula. Ann Neurol 82(3):360–370CrossRef Mazzola L, Royet JP, Catenoix H, Montavont A, Isnard J, Mauguiere F (2017) Gustatory and olfactory responses to stimulation of the human insula. Ann Neurol 82(3):360–370CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kershaw JC, Running CA (2018) Conditioning of human salivary flow using a visual cue for sour candy. Arch Oral Biol 92:90–95CrossRef Kershaw JC, Running CA (2018) Conditioning of human salivary flow using a visual cue for sour candy. Arch Oral Biol 92:90–95CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pangborn RM, Witherly SA, Jones F (1979) Parotid and whole-mouth secretion in response to viewing, handling, and sniffing food. Perception 8(3):339–346CrossRef Pangborn RM, Witherly SA, Jones F (1979) Parotid and whole-mouth secretion in response to viewing, handling, and sniffing food. Perception 8(3):339–346CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nederkoorn C, de Wit T, Smulders FTY et al (2001) Experimental comparison of different techniques to measure saliva. Appetite 37:251–252CrossRef Nederkoorn C, de Wit T, Smulders FTY et al (2001) Experimental comparison of different techniques to measure saliva. Appetite 37:251–252CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194CrossRef Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Manesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M et al (2017) Dysosmia-associated changes in eating behavior. Chemosens Percept 10(4):104–113CrossRef Manesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M et al (2017) Dysosmia-associated changes in eating behavior. Chemosens Percept 10(4):104–113CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafford LD, Welbeck K (2011) High hunger state increases olfactory sensitivity to neutral but not food odors. Chem Senses. 36:189–198CrossRef Stafford LD, Welbeck K (2011) High hunger state increases olfactory sensitivity to neutral but not food odors. Chem Senses. 36:189–198CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food
verfasst von
Y. Zang
P. Han
S. Burghardt
A. Knaapila
V. Schriever
T. Hummel
Publikationsdatum
16.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05558-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.