Background
Monkeypox virus (MPV) was first identified in laboratory-maintained cynomolgus monkeys [
1]. The virus is believed to have been circulating for a long time in numerous animal hosts, including squirrels, in central and western Africa. Early human infections with MPV, which was recognized in Zaire and later in Liberia and Sierra Leone, occurred through direct contact with infected animals [
2]. However, person-to-person transmission was reported more recently [
3]. Monkeypox disease manifestation is similar to that of smallpox, but with lower case fatalities and more localized pustular rash distribution [
4]. Because vaccination against smallpox ceased in early 1980s after the disease was declared eradicated [
5], current public immunity towards poxviruses is deemed non-protective and younger generations are considered completely immune naive. Thus, a surprising natural, incidental or deliberate release of virulent monkeypox or other orthopox viruses poses a serious threat to public health. Currently, there are no licensed drugs to treat poxvirus infections, and use of antiviral Cidofovir and ST-246 [
6] may gradually erode with emergence of resistant viral strains [
7,
8] or further identification of limiting drug side effects [
6,
9]. Therefore, the need for new effective drugs and novel therapeutic strategies that can withstand field application challenges is paramount.
RNA interference (RNAi) is a natural mechanism for gene expression regulation and protection against insertion of foreign RNA in plant and mammalian cells [
10]. RNAi-based studies have been particularly valuable in elucidating gene functions in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms [
11]. Recent advances in siRNA delivery systems and selective targeting methodology leveraged the prodigious utility of the RNAi pathway as a therapeutic approach for infectious, neurodegenerative, cancer, and hereditary diseases [
12].
The use of RNAi pathway as a new approach in antiviral drug discovery is particularly promising because viruses have relatively small genomes with a limited number of targetable genes. Furthermore, genetic distance between mammalian and viral genomes represents an advantage in minimizing off-target hits and reducing possible side effects [
13]. Recent studies utilized RNAi to silence specific viral genes and identify its function [
14], or to inhibit viral replication [
15]. In this study, we developed siRNAs to target several monkeypox viral proteins, and demonstrated the application of this approach in identifying new drug targets and inhibiting viral replication in cell culture.
Discussion
Despite the outstanding success of vaccination in eradicating smallpox, the process was underlined with significant adverse reactions including inadvertent inoculation, ocular vaccinia, generalized vaccinia, eczema vaccinatum, progressive vaccinia, postvaccinial encephalopathy and encephalomyelitis, and fetal vaccinia. These complications can occur among primary vaccinated individuals or in secondary patients who are accidentally inoculated upon their contact with vaccinated individual [
23,
24]. Resorting to vaccine as a response measure to sudden poxvirus release is undermined further by increasing prevalence of immuno- compromised individuals and delayed immune protection inherent to vaccination. Broad use of vaccinia immune globulin (VIG) is hampered by its limited accessibility; hence, adhering to developing a chemical agent that is effective and safe for use in PI and chemoprophylaxis purposes presents a more favorable approach. While Cidofovir [
25] and ST-246 [
8] remain the drugs of choice for poxvirus infections, known side effects or propensity to develop resistant viral strains dictate cautious use [
8,
26,
27].
In this study, we showed that RNAi can be used as a potent approach to reduce MPV replication in a sequence-specific manner. We screened 48 siRNA constructs in 12 pools targeting 12 monkeypox genes and examined their effect on viral replication. We showed that the siRNAs affected MPV replication in various degrees. Two siRNA pools exhibited substantial antiviral properties and reduced viral replication to less than 10% of its propagation in control untreated cells. A single siRNA construct targeting A6R gene suppressed viral replication to near completion with IC50 less than 10 nanomoles.
The observed disparity in siRNA efficacy among screened pools is consistent with a number of previous reports [
28,
29]. Although reasons for this variation are still not fully understood, it is accepted that delivery of siRNA in its optimal functional concentration to targeted cells, and other unpredictable sub-cellular events such as concentration of siRNA in endosomes or trapping in other vesicles are major causes of variation in siRNA efficacy studies [
30]. Furthermore, larger forms of RNA undergo a number of sequential processing steps before they interact with RNAi machinery and achieve the intended biological function. This include processing of miRNA and shRNA by Dicer, assembly of resultant guide strand into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), recognition of target viral RNA sequences and cleavage of targeted mRNA. Because these steps involve interactions of various secondary molecular conformations defined by diverse primary sequences they are likely to exhibit unequal efficiencies, which would factor into the observed variation in siRNAs potency. Thus, identifying an effective siRNA empirically remains a common tool in therapeutic applications of RNAi [
31].
It is important to note that screened siRNA pools may have silenced the targeted genes, but without producing a phenotype or influencing MPV replication. This is essentially defined by the function of the targeted gene. Presence of viral or host compensating mechanisms for the function of knocked-down gene would obfuscate evaluation of siRNA efficacy further [
32], especially when reduction or inhibition of replication is the endpoint in assessing siRNA potency. Alternatively, multiple genes with varied copy number [
33] are found to contribute to the same phenotype or trait with different intensities. Using siRNA and reverse genetics to silence one or more of these genes and determine its function is intrinsically difficult. Similarly, genes associated with high translation turnover duration [
34] or highly efficient protein synthesis mechanisms can sustain viral replication at low copy number. Nevertheless, our results provided reverse genetic evidence for the vitality of A6R and E8L in MPV replication, and further work is needed to clarify the knockdown of the other targets at the gene or protein level.
Poxvirus is the only known double-stranded DNA viral family that propagates in host cytoplasm and encodes most of the enzymes and factors necessary for transcription and replication of its material [
35]. Once the virus enters into the host cytoplasm, it becomes uncoated to release its genetic information and component of early transcription system packaged within the core of the virion [
36,
37]. Many targeted RNA sequences will interact with viral and/or cellular proteins which would hamper, if not prevent, the ability of RNA-induced silencing complex to recognize its viral targets [
38]. This may contribute to the variation we observed in the efficacy of single siRNA constructs within the same pool as in the case of siE8-d and siE8-c which target the same E8L gene.
The function of siA6-a and E8-d targets in MPV remain unidentified; however, their orthologs in vaccinia, A5R, and D8L, function as a precursor of RNA polymerase [
39] and cell attachment protein [
40]. Mutant vaccinia virus with dysfunctional A5 or D8 genes show no or severely perturbed viral replication. Soluble vaccinia D8 protein, which binds chondroitin sulfate (CS), interferes with adsorption of wild-type vaccinia and decreases viral propagation rate. The significant decrease of MPV replication in siE8-d treated cells, and the disruptive effect of soluble D8 on vaccinia adsorption with consequent lower rates of replication imply a sort of similarity in both gene functions and suggests possible role for CS in MPV cell entry. The presence of alternative MPV cell-attachment and adsorption mechanisms, such as binding of A27L protein with cell heparan sulfate HS described in vaccinia [
41], may account for the incomplete replication inhibition of MPV replication despite knock-down of E8 gene.
Persistence of RNAi occurs for short period of time mainly due to the relatively short half life of siRNA and lack of an amplification mechanism in mammalian cells. The estimated 66 hours of RNAi persistence is relatively short due to siRNA hydrolysis and dilution over the course of cell division [
42]. Recently D5R gene in vaccinia virus strain Western Reserve was introduced as a valid siRNA target
in vitro[
43]. Targeting this gene in vaccinia WR, CPV, and MPV led to 70% inhibition of viral replication at nanomolar levels of siRNA using different cell lines. The same work report an impressive prolonged prophylactic antiviral effect that lasted for 72 h at concentration of 100 nm. Surprisingly, our siA6-a maintained solid viral replication inhibition for more than 7 days PI in cell culture at concentration of 20 nm. This unusual stability may be due to a unique molecule tertiary structure and/or highly sensitive target. Further work is under way to access the pharmacokinetics of A6-a construct and address this point.
The antiviral effects of 20 nm of siA6-a and 100 nm of Cidofovir were comparable and seem to inhibit the replication of all virus forms. These two drugs target the virus directly by silencing gene expression or interfering with vDNA replication without perturbing host cell biology. However, easy synthesis and adjustment of siRNA sequence represent an extra advantage over other chemically synthesized drugs. This, in addition to recent advancements in sequencing capabilities and bioinformatics, enabled unprecedented flexibility to readapt siRNA molecules to function on any emerging resistant viral strains, enhance siRNA specificity, and reduce potential side effects. These tasks are made easier when the targeted microorganism and its host are genetically different. In our case, siA6-a didn't induce any signs of cytotoxicity and seemed not interfere with host cell biology even when used at concentrations up to ten times its IC50.
An alternative approach for developing antiviral drugs targets specific host functions necessary for viral replication. A good example of this class of targets is the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases [
44], which disrupt viral maturation and replication cycle when antagonized. A member of this family (ErbB-1) was inhibited by CI-1033, a drug that has been developed originally for its anticancer properties, and led to significant reduction in poxvirus activity [
45]. However, CI-1033 seems to be more specific in targeting IMV and not EEV forms. This was evident from the described reduction in the size and not overall plaque count, and from the synergistic antiviral effect observed in cells co-treated with neutralizing virus antibodies and CI-1033. It remains unclear how inhibiting ErbB would affect host homeostasis. The complete inhibition of MPV replication by targeting A6R gene suggests that, unlike CI-1033, siA6-a acts on an indispensable viral function at a stage upstream to viral differentiation into distinct forms, and abolishes virus replication regardless of its form.
In conclusion, using RNAi pathway we identified two MPV genes that serve as potential drug targets during infection in cell culture. A6R and E8L genes of MPV were antagonized effectively using siRNA molecules, and constructs siA6-a and siE8-d disrupted MPV replication severely. siA6-a construct exhibited considerable stability and promising antiviral potency with IC50 less than 10 nm. Chemical modification study aiming to enhance A6-a stability and development of suitable siRNA delivery system are needed before assessing siA6-a in animal models.
Materials and methods
Viruses and cultures
Wild-type monkeypox virus, strain Katako Kombe (MPV-KK) and MPV expressing green fluorescent protein (MPV-GFP) were used to evaluate siRNA efficacy [
19]. The viruses were propagated in Vero E6 cells maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium with non-essential amino acids (EMEM/NEAA) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mg/L Gentamycin, 250 μg/L Fungizone, and buffered with 10 mM HEPES [
46]. Viral titers were determined by the plaque assay as described in [
29]. Briefly, monolayers of confluent Vero-E6 cells in six-well plates were overlaid with 100-200 μl aliquots of serial dilutions of examined viral sample in triplicate. The virus was allowed to absorb for 1 h at 37°C with gentle mix for 30 sec each 15 min. Two to three ml of complete culture medium was added to each well, and plates were incubated until the development of clear plaques (≈ 4-5 days). Stock solution of 1.3 g/L of crystal violet, 30% formalin, and 5% ethanol was diluted with PBS (1:2) and used to fix and stain the cells. Plates were incubated 15-20 min at room temperature to allow clear staining. Cells were rinsed gently with PBS and plaques were counted on a light box.
For experiments involving MPV-GFP, plates were infected with 2000 plaque-forming units (pfu) per well unless otherwise indicated. Fluorescence readings were taken every 24 h by using a Gemini EM fluorescence reader and Softmax 4.7 software (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA). The results were normalized to average fluorescence in control cells. Data were expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test when appropriate.
siRNA design, preparation, and transfection
Chemically synthesized siRNAs were custom-designed to target selected MPV genes by Dharmacon (Chicago, IL). siRNA sequences were BLAST-searched against the human genome database to assess possible cross-reactivity. For each targeted gene, four siRNAs were synthesized and pooled. Dried siRNA pools were reconstituted in rehydration buffer (100 mM KCl, 30 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2) to a final concentration of 100 μM and stored at -80°C until used.
LLC-MK2 cells were used to evaluate the efficacy of the siRNAs. Confluent cells were briefly trypsinized, counted, and resuspended in culture medium at desired concentration. Cell suspension was used to seed 24-well culture plates (Costar, Lowell, MA), and plates were incubated for 24-48 h to allow multiplication of cells in antibiotic- and Fungizone-free medium before infection with virus. To transfect the cells, siRNA and the transfection reagent were complexed as recommended by the manufacturer (Dharmacon, Chicago, IL). Briefly, equal volume of 10× solution (relative to the final intended concentrations) of siRNA and transfection reagent were prepared and mixed together. The resultant 5× solutions mix was incubated for 30 min at room temperature to allow the formation of siRNA transfection complex. This was diluted to the intended final 1× concentration using OPTI-MEM-I (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were washed twice gently with 0.5 ml of OPTI-MEM-I buffer and incubated with 1× transfection siRNA complex for 12 to 16 h prior to viral infection.
Cells infection with virus
To infect siRNA transfected and non transfected control cells with MPV, incubation medium was replaced by the virus inoculum diluted to produce the desired MOIs using OPTI-MEM-I (GIBCO-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were incubated with the virus seed for 30 min at room temperature to allow viral absorption, and gentle 15-sec shake every 10 min was done to ensure even viral distribution. Removed culture medium was added back, and cells were incubated in 93-95% relative humidity atmosphere at 37°C, 5% CO2.
Toxicity assay
Cells viability was assessed using MTT Cell Proliferation assay (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Briefly, 10 μl of MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 until clear purple crystals precipitant appeared in cells cytoplasm (4-8 h). Cells were lysed by adding 100 μl of detergent (proprietary, ATCC kit) and incubated overnight or until the purple crystals were dissolved. Color intensity was measured by spectrophotometer (Tecan, Pittsburgh, PA) at 570 nm, and cytotoxicity was calculated as a ratio of absorbance in treated versus untreated cells.
Acknowledgements
We thank Mohamed Ait Ichou, Jason Farlow, Lorraine Farinick, and Catherine Kenyon for thoughtful discussions, critical review, and assistance during manuscript preparation. The research described herein was supported by a grant from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Project number 4.10022_07_RD_B.
Disclaimer
Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army. The mention of materials or products in this article doesn't constitute endorsement by the department of Defense or the United States government.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors read and approved this manuscript. AA was responsible for design and completion of the bulk of the research, as well as for data analysis and writing of this manuscript. SS carried out part of the experiments including plaque assays. EM contributed with critical thinking and planning towards experiments, carried out GFP-MPV based assays and maintained virus strains. JH and PJ were instrumental in providing support to the research in the form of both instruction and facilitating all virus culture aspects of the research, including establishing, selecting, and maintaining all virus strains. SMI was the Principal Investigator and is primarily responsible for all aspects of the funding, research design, interpretation, and writing of this manuscript.