Background
Kidney transplantation is considered to be the preferred therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease, as it can significantly prolong the lifespan and improve the quality of life in patients [
1]. However, long-term graft survival still remains unsatisfactory. Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is the major contributor to post-transplant rejection risk and allograft loss, accounting for 30–50% of acute rejection episodes in kidney transplantation [
2‐
4]. AMR is mainly associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) targeting mismatched HLA molecules. The DSAs can destroy allografts through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) pathways [
5,
6]. Current therapies with conventional immunosuppression frequently fail to control DSA production and AMR [
7,
8]. Thus, it’s necessary to understand the underlying mechanism and develop novel therapeutic strategies for its efficient treatment.
Increasing evidence showed a relationship between gut microbiota and solid organ allograft rejection. Gut microbiota is thought to be a microbial marker or therapeutic target for the predication and intervention of allograft rejection. Alterations in gut microbiota could impact the host immune system, and are closely associated with acute and chronic allograft rejection in small bowel transplantation (SBT) [
9]. In the skin-grafted mice model, differences in the resident microbiome in healthy donors have been suggested to translate into distinct kinetics of graft rejection [
10]. Additionally, gut microbiota has been reported to impact chronic murine lung allograft rejection [
11]. Our previous study has revealed significant differences in the gut microbial composition between recipients with AMR and the controls with stable renal functions, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing [
12]. Specific taxa such as
Clostridiales could be potentially used as biomarkers to distinguish the recipients with AMR from the controls [
12]. However, due to the limitations of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, alternations in gut microbial function and structure at species level have not been identified.
In order to provide direct evidence and comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection, we performed integrative metagenomic and metabolomic analyses of fecal samples in recipients with AMR after kidney transplantation. Overall, we identified 311 down-regulated and 27 up-regulated gut microbial species associated with AMR after kidney transplantation, resulting in the altered expression levels of 437 genes enriched in 22 pathways, of which 13 were related to metabolism. Furthermore, 32 differential fecal metabolites were detected in recipients with AMR. Alterations in fecal metabolites such as 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid and l-pipecolic acid, directly correlated with changes in gut microbial composition and function. Specific differential fecal species and metabolites could distinguish the recipients with AMR from controls as potential biomarkers.
Methods
Study cohort and sample collection.
Totally, 60 kidney transplantation recipients from Henan Provincial People’s Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University were enrolled in this study, 28 of which showed AMR (AMR group) and 32 of which were with stable post-transplant renal functions (control group). This study was performed according to ethical guidelines of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University. AMR was diagnosed with the Banff 2019 criteria [
13]. Recipients were excluded if there was a recent history of infection, non-infectious diarrhea, antibiotic usage, or gastric/colon resection. Patients were asked to provide the fecal samples within 24 h after AMR diagnosis. Fecal samples from kidney transplantation recipients with stable renal functions were collected as controls. Fresh stool samples collected from each subject were immediately frozen at − 80 °C until they were processed.
About 100 mg of fecal content were used for DNA extraction using the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QIAGEN, Netherlands) following manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA were checked with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Metagenome shotgun libraries with insert sizes of 400 bp were constructed for Illumina sequencers using a TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) based on manufacturer’s protocols. Sequencing of 2 × 150-bp paired-end reads was performed on an Illumina HiSeq X-ten platform (Illumina, USA) at Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
To obtain high-quality reads for further analysis, raw reads were firstly processed using Cutadapt (v1.2.1) to trim sequencing adapters and low-quality bases, and then mapped to the host genome using BWA (
http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/) to remove host contamination [
14]. The quality-filtered reads were de novo assembled to construct the metagenome for each sample by MEGAHIT (
https://hku-bal.github.io/megabox/) [
15]. The metagenomic scaffolds longer than 200 bp were used for ORF prediction by MetaGeneMark (
http://exon.gatech.edu/GeneMark/metagenome) [
16]. All ORFs were clustered by CD-HIT to construct a non-redundant gene catalog (identity > 90%) [
17].
Gene abundance in each sample was estimated by soap.coverage (
http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) based on the number of aligned reads. For taxa analysis, genes were searched with the lowest common ancestor (LCA) approach against NCBI-NT database by BLASTN (e value < 0.001). The abundance of a taxonomic group was calculated by summing its matching genes. For functional annotation, gene catalogs were annotated using DIAMOND against KEGG databases [
18]. Antibiotic resistance and virulence genes of microbiota were identified using Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and Virulence Factor Database (VFDB), respectively [
19,
20].
About 100 mg of fecal sample was used for metabolite extraction. Subsequently, 1 mL of ice-cold chloroform/methanol/water (1:2:1, v/v/v) was added to each fecal sample. The homogenates were then incubated at 4 °C for 2 h and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was further filtered using a 0.22 μm membrane filter, blown dry with nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until use. Meanwhile, an equal aliquot from each sample was mixed to prepare the quality control (QC) samples. A solution of isopropanol/acetonitrile/water (1:1:2, v/v/v) was used to reconstitute samples before LC/MS analysis.
LC/MS Chromatographic separation was performed on an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) DIONEX UltiMate_3000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a C18 column, 1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The flow rate was 0.35 mL/min, the injection volume was 3 μL, and the column temperature was 45 °C. Mobile Phase A consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (FA), and Mobile Phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% FA. The gradient elution used was started from 98% A for 0.5 min, linearly decreased to 2% A for 14.5 min, held for 3 min, and finally linearly increased to 98% A to re-equilibrate for 3 min. The QC samples were inserted into the analytical queue to monitor and evaluate the system stability and data reliability. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS) using UHPLC coupled to a QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Bremen, Germany). Electrospray ionization (ESI) was performed in positive and negative ion modes. The conditions of the ESI source were as follows: spray voltage, 3.5 kV (ESI+) or 3.2 kV (ESI−); source temperature, 320 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 45 Arb; aux gas flow rate, 15 Arb; mass range, 80–1200 m/z; full ms resolution, 70,000; MS/MS resolution, 17,500; TopN, 10; stepped NCE, (20,40,60); duty cycle, ~ 1.2 s.
Peak alignment, retention time correction, and peak area extraction were performed using the Compound Discoverer 3.0 program [
21]. Accurate mass number matching (< 25 ppm) and second-level spectrogram matching were used to retrieve the MZcloud database [
11]. Orthogonal partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) analysis was performed using the Pareto scaling method and SIMCA-P software [
22]. Metabolites with both multidimensional statistical analysis VIP > 1 and univariate statistical analysis
P value < 0.05 were selected as metabolites with significant differences. The sample preparation and subsequent metabolomic analysis were conducted at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Statistical analysis
Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student’s t-test were used for non-normally distributed and normally distributed quantitative data, respectively. Qualitative data were analyzed by chi-square test. Statistical analyses of demographic and clinical characteristics data were conducted with SPSS Statistics (version 22.0.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Throughout, P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Alpha-diversity indices (ACE, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) were calculated with QIIME (Version 1.9.0). The statistical significance of alpha diversity between groups was evaluated by Mann Whitney U test or Student’s t-test using SPSS. Beta-diversity was calculated by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and hierarchical clustering with the QIIME. Differential abundance of taxa, KO and metabolites was tested by Wilcoxon rank sum test. Only species or KOs with an average relative abundance above 10
−7 were considered in the analyses. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (
LEfSe) was also utilized to compare and visualize significant differences in species between groups [
23]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value.
Discussion
In this study, we provided extended details regarding the role of gut microbiota in recipients with AMR after kidney transplantation with metagenomics and metabolomics. Totally, we identified 311 down-regulated and 27 up-regulated species associated with AMR. Changes in gut microbiota mainly resulted in the altered metabolic function, for example, Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, Fructose and mannose metabolism, and Starch and sucrose metabolism Alanine. The fecal metabolome of recipients with AMR was also dramatically changed compared to controls. Correlations were observable between the fecal metabolites and microbiota. Moreover, specific differential fecal species and metabolites were strongly associated with the clinical indexes of AMR, and may serve as diagnostic biomarkers.
The present study demonstrated gut dysbiosis in recipients with AMR after kidney transplantation. A similar phenomenon was also observed in rats with acute rejection after liver transplantation [
24]. Early-life disruption of the gut microbiota was reported to cause acute vascular rejection, which was related to exacerbate immune responses [
25]. Consistent with our previous findings based on 16s rDNA sequencing [
12], the alteration of gut microbiota diversity in recipients with AMR mainly reflected in decreased Chao 1 and ACE indices, while the changes in Shannon and Simpson indices were not apparent. Since metagenomic sequencing is a powerful approach with a high taxonomic accuracy at the species level for studying microbial communities [
26], we performed an in-depth characterization of the gut flora in AMR, and identified 311 down-regulated and 27 up-regulated species.
The top five differential species based on relative abundance were
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, [Eubacterium] rectale, [Ruminococcus] torques, Coprococcus catus, and
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, and all their relative abundance were decreased in recipients with AMR.
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, the most important butyrate-producing bacteria in human colon, was previously reported to be negatively correlated with inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer [
27]. Generally,
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii occupied an anti-inflammatory role by producing metabolites (butyrate and salicylic acid) and inducing IL-10 [
28,
29]. Similarly,
[Eubacterium] rectale and
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum could help to maintain intestinal barrier and suppress inflammation activation through inhibiting CD83 and TLR4/NF-κB, respectively [
30,
31]. Increased
Lactobacillus counts were observed in patients with chronic kidney disease and recipients with AMR [
12,
32]. Here, we more accurately identified increased
Lactobacillus fermentum,
Lactobacillus johnsonii and
Lactobacillus acidophilus in recipients with AMR after kidney transplantation using shotgun metagenomic sequencing, all of which were demonstrated to have the effect of enhancing immune response, especially antibody response [
33‐
35]. Possibly, the gut microbiota dysbiosis with decrease in immunosuppressive species and decrease in immune enhancing species in recipients could promote AMR through enhancing the donor specific antibody response.
Changes of gut microbiota usually resulted in functional alteration. In the present work, we totally identified 437 differential KOs between recipients with AMR and the controls, which were enriched in 22 pathways. The differences in metabolic pathways (Arginine and proline metabolism, Sulfur metabolism, Pentose and glucuronate interconversions, etc.) caused by alteration of gut microbiota in AMR were the most obvious, which was similar to the prediction from our previous study by PICRUSt analysis [
12]. Thus, we performed metabolomics analysis to further investigate the metabolic changes, and found 11 metabolites (taurocholate, phenol,
l-glutamine, alpha-ketoglutarate, N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide, etc.) up-regulated, and 21 metabolites (
N-acetyl-
l-histidine, ferulic acid, 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid, 2-isopropylmalic acid, N6, N6, N6-trimethyl-
l-lysine, etc.) down-regulated in fecal samples from recipients with AMR. A serum metabolomics study of the acute graft rejection in human renal transplantation based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry have revealed comprehensive metabolic abnormalities in acute graft rejection [
36]. Metabolites such as creatinine, kynurenine, uric acid, polyunsaturated fatty acid, phosphatidylcholines, sphingomyelins, and lysophosphatidylcholines were identified as discriminative metabolites in the serum from the acute graft rejection after transplantation [
36].
Among the differential fecal metabolites we identified, 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid,
l-pipecolic acid, taurocholate, and 6k-PGF1alpha-d4 were directly correlated with altered gut microbial species and the related functional genes of enzymes. Both 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid and taurocholate were metabolites involved in bile acid metabolism [
37,
38]. Consistent with our results, taurocholate was also detected with higher intensity in fecal samples from patients with rejection after intestinal transplantation compared to non-rejection ones [
38]. Increased concentrations of glycocholate plus glycochenodeoxycholate and taurocholate/taurochenodeoxycholate ratios could be used for early detection of hepatic allograft dysfunction [
39]. Moreover, elevated taurocholic acid and glycocholic acid in the bronchoalveolar lavage were reported to be associated with concurrent acute lung allograft dysfunction and inflammatory proteins [
40]. Taken together, combining these literature reports and our data, we inferred that the gut microbiota mediated-taurocholate alteration played a crucial role in promoting AMR after kidney transplantation. Few reports on the functions of 3b-hydroxy-5-cholenoic acid,
l-pipecolic acid, and 6k-PGF1alpha-d4 have been published, therefore further research is necessary to demonstrate their role in AMR. Based on the above results, we hypothesize that changes of gut microbiota structure and function could result in the alteration of the fecal metabolites, and in turn may impact the pathogenesis and progression of AMR. It is still noteworthy that causal conclusions cannot be drawn from our data, and further Mendelian randomization studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. This will have important implications for understanding the precise role of gut microbiota in AMR.
Besides the metabolites mentioned above, N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide and aminopterin should also be noted, since they exhibited high correlation with multiple clinical indicators of kidney function. N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide is an end product of NAD
+ catabolism. Previously, Rutkowski et al. have suggested that high serum concentrations of N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide in chronic renal failure resulted from kidney function injury, since the serum concentrations of N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide were approximately 20-fold higher in patients with advanced renal failure than in healthy controls, which could decline after dialysis or kidney transplantation [
41]. Strong associations of urinary N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide/N1-methylnicotinamide with kidney function has also been demonstrated by Azer et al. [
42]. Accordingly, elevation of N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide in fecal sample observed in our study could be also associated with renal dysfunction induced by AMR. Aminopterin, as a folic acid antagonist, has been previously used for the treatment of leukemia and rheumatoid arthritis [
43,
44]. However, the unsatisfactory therapeutic effects and unpredictable toxicities of aminopterin limit its clinical application [
45]. Interestingly, during treatments, all the patients enrolled in this study didn’t have aminopterin which also could not be generated by metabolizing drugs in regimens. From this it was hypothesized that increased aminopterin in fecal samples from recipients with AMR was endogenous. However, the specific mechanism may require further research.
Banff criteria, a combination of serologic (circulating DSA), histologic (primarily microvascular inflammation and transplant glomerulopathy), and immunohistologic (C4d staining in peritubular capillaries) criteria, is the gold standard for the diagnosis of AMR after kidney transplantation [
13]. Histologic and immunohistologic evidences could be accessed in invasive manners, thus the identification of novel non-invasive potential biomarkers for the effective diagnosis of AMR is necessary. It has recently been shown that gut microbiota and their metabolites could be used as markers to distinguish patients with colorectal cancer or chronic kidney disease from healthy individuals [
46,
47]. In this study, we also identified a series of microbial and metabolomic markers to discriminate kidney transplantation recipients with AMR from cases with stable kidney function. Of note, the combination model with both the microbial and metabolic markers had the AUC more than 0.9, suggesting that it may have high diagnostic value for AMR. Easily accessible fecal samples and improvements in multiomic technologies will enable microbiota-based diagnosis for recipients with AMR.
There are some limitations in the present study that must be recognized. Firstly, our findings warrant further confirmation with an external cohort. Secondly, the data extracted from non-transplant fecal samples was absent. Comparing the findings of this study to the data extracted from non-transplant fecal samples will provide a metagenomic and metabolic background for the allograft recipients, and further studies will be required to address this important issue. Thirdly, we didn’t take account of the compositional nature of microbiome datasets in the selection of the analysis methods. The counts of sequencing reads assigned to organisms were normalized to a constant area. Thus, our results could reflect only changes in the relative abundance of the microbiota but not the absolute abundance.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.