Erschienen in:
02.02.2022 | Reports of Original Investigations
Intraoperative phlebotomies and bleeding in liver transplantation: a historical cohort study and causal analysis
verfasst von:
François Martin Carrier, MD, MSc, Steve Ferreira Guerra, MSc, Janie Coulombe, PhD, Éva Amzallag, MSc, Luc Massicotte, MD, Michaël Chassé, MD, PhD, Helen Trottier, PhD
Erschienen in:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
|
Ausgabe 4/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Liver transplantation is associated with major bleeding and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. No well-designed causal analysis on interventions used to reduce transfusions, such as an intraoperative phlebotomy, has been conducted in this population.
Methods
We conducted a historical cohort study among liver transplantations performed from July 2008 to January 2021 in a Canadian centre. The exposure was intraoperative phlebotomy. The outcomes were blood loss, perioperative RBC transfusions (intraoperative and up to 48 hr after surgery), intraoperative RBC transfusions, and one-year survival. We estimated marginal multiplicative factors (MFs), risk differences (RDs), and hazard ratios by inverse probability of treatment weighting both among treated patients and the whole population. Estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
We included 679 patients undergoing liver transplantations of which 365 (54%) received an intraoperative phlebotomy. A phlebotomy did not reduce bleeding, transfusion risks, or mortality when estimated among the treated but reduced bleeding and transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population (MF, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.99; perioperative RD, −15.2%; 95% CI, −26.1 to −0.8; intraoperative RD, −14.7%; 95% CI, −23.2 to −2.8). In a subgroup analysis on 584 patients with end-stage liver disease, slightly larger effects were observed on both transfusion risks when estimated among the whole population while beneficial effects were observed on the intraoperative transfusion risk when estimated among the treated population.
Conclusion
The use of intraoperative phlebotomy was not consistently associated with better outcomes in all targets of inference but may improve outcomes among the whole population.