The Global Fund raises and invests nearly US$4 billion a year to support programs run in more than 140 countries. The Global Fund strategy 2012–2016 is focused on “Investing for Impact”. In order to accomplish this, timely and accurate data are needed to inform strategies and prioritize activities to achieve greater coverage with quality services. Monitoring and evaluation is intrinsic to the Global Fund’s system of performance-based funding. The Global Fund invests in strengthening measurement and reporting of results at all stages of the grant cycle. The Global Fund approach to measurement is based on three key principles—(1) simplified reporting: the Global Fund has updated its measurement guidance to focus on impact, coverage and quality with the use of a harmonized set of indicators. (2) Supporting data systems—based on a common framework developed and supported by partners, it promotes investment in five common data systems: routine reporting including HMIS; Surveys—population based and risk group surveys; Analysis, reviews and transparency; Administrative and financial data sources; and, Vital registration systems. (3) Strengthen data use: the Global Fund funding encourages use of data at all levels—national, subnational and site level. Countries do not automatically prioritize M&E but when guidance, tools and investments are available, there is high level utilization of M&E systems in program design, planning, implementation, and results reporting. An in-depth analysis of the available data helps the Global Fund and countries to direct investments towards interventions where impact could be achieved and focus on target population groups and geographic areas that are most affected.
The Global Fund strategy—investing for impact 2012–2016. www.theglobalfund.org/…/strategies/Core_GlobalFund_Strategy_en/.
Decision point 15, Board meeting, April 2002. http://www.theglobalfund.org/Knowledge/Decisions/GF/B03/DP15/.
The Global Fund Measurement guidance, December 2014. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/me/documents/measurementguidance/.
Monitoring and evaluation strategy. 2003. http://www.theglobalfund.org/Knowledge/Decisions/GF/B06/DP07/.
Decision point 11, Board Meeting. March 2004. http://www.theglobalfund.org/Knowledge/Decisions/GF/B07/DP11/.
The Global Fund Annual Report 2004. www.theglobalfund.org/…/Corporate_2004Annual_Report_en/.
Report of the five year evaluation of the Global Fund, Five Year Evaluation of the Global Fund.
High level panel report- “Turning the Page from Emergency to Sustainability”. 2011. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/search/?q=turning+the+page+from+emergency+to+sustainability.
Core list of indicators. Dec 2014. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/me/documents/indicatorslist/.
Decision point 6, Board meeting March 2014, Special initiatives for country data systems. http://www.theglobalfund.org/Knowledge/Decisions/GF/B31/DP06/.
Guidance note- epidemiological and impact analysis, Dec 2014. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/me/documents/analysis/.
The Global Fund grant management platform.
The Global Fund Enhanced Financial Reporting system.
Global reference list of 100 core health indicators, 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/173589/1/WHO_HIS_HSI_2015.3_eng.pdf.
National size estimation of Most at Risk Populations for HIV in Sri Lanka, Report, Nov 2015, Size estimation for MAPRs for HIV in Sri Lanka.
Innovation in the Zimbabwe Health Information System, UNDP, 2014. http://www.undp-globalfund-capacitydevelopment.org/media/475866/dhis_case_study-web.pdf.
Sabin K, Zhao J, Garcia Calleja JM, Sheng Y, Arias Garcia S, Reinisch A, et al. Availability and quality of size estimations of female sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs and transgender women in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155150. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- Investing for Impact: The Global Fund Approach to Measurement of AIDS Response
- Springer US