Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Paper

Is bacteriostatic saline superior to normal saline as an echocardiographic contrast agent?

verfasst von: Shaun Cardozo, Prasad Gunasekaran, Hena Patel, Timothy McGorisk, Mehrdad Toosi, Haroon Faraz, Sandip Zalawadiya, Issa Alesh, Anupama Kottam, Luis Afonso

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective data on the performance characteristics and physical properties of commercially available saline formulations [normal saline (NS) vs. bacteriostatic normal saline (bNS)] are sparse. This study sought to compare the in vitro physical properties and in vivo characteristics of two commonly employed echocardiographic saline contrast agents in an attempt to assess superiority. Nineteen patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiograms were each administered agitated regular NS and bNS injections in random order and in a blinded manner according to a standardized protocol. Video time-intensity (TI) curves were constructed from a representative region of interest, placed paraseptally within the right atrium, in the bicaval view. TI curves were analyzed for maximal plateau acoustic intensity (Vmax, dB) and dwell time (DT, s), defined as time duration between onset of Vmax and decay of video intensity below clinically useful levels, reflecting the duration of homogenous opacification of the right atrium. To further characterize the physical properties of the bubbles in vitro, fixed aliquots of similarly agitated saline were injected into a glass well slide-cover slip assembly and examined using an optical microscope to determine bubble diameter in microns (µm) and concentration [bubble count/high power field (hpf)]. A higher acoustic intensity (a less negative dB level), higher bubble concentration and longer DT were considered properties of a superior contrast agent. For statistical analysis, a paired t test was conducted to evaluate the differences in means of Vmax and DT. Compared to NS, bNS administration was associated with superior opacification (video intensity −8.69 ± 4.7 vs. −10.46 ± 4.1 dB, P = 0.002), longer DT (17.3 ± 6.1 vs. 10.2 ± 3.7 s) in vivo and smaller mean bubble size (43.4 vs. 58.6 μm) and higher bubble concentration (1,002 vs. 298 bubble/hpf) in vitro. bNS provides higher intensity and more sustained opacification of the right atrium compared to NS. Higher bubble concentration and stability appear to be additional desirable rheological characteristics favoring bNS as a contrast agent.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gazzaniga P, Buscarini E, Leandro G, Reduzzi L, Grosso M, Pongiglione G, Pedrinazzi C, Lanzarini L, Portugalli V, Blotta P, Forner P, Boccardi E, Pagella F, Manfredi G, Olivieri C, Zambelli A, Danesino C, Inama G (2009) Contrast echocardiography for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations screening: does any bubble matter? Eur J Echocardiogr 10:513–518. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen317 PubMedCrossRef Gazzaniga P, Buscarini E, Leandro G, Reduzzi L, Grosso M, Pongiglione G, Pedrinazzi C, Lanzarini L, Portugalli V, Blotta P, Forner P, Boccardi E, Pagella F, Manfredi G, Olivieri C, Zambelli A, Danesino C, Inama G (2009) Contrast echocardiography for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations screening: does any bubble matter? Eur J Echocardiogr 10:513–518. doi:10.​1093/​ejechocard/​jen317 PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeon DS, Luo H, Iwami T, Miyamoto T, Brasch AV, Mirocha J, Naqvi TZ, Siegel RJ (2002) The usefulness of a 10% air-10% blood-80% saline mixture for contrast echocardiography: Doppler measurement of pulmonary artery systolic pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:124–129PubMedCrossRef Jeon DS, Luo H, Iwami T, Miyamoto T, Brasch AV, Mirocha J, Naqvi TZ, Siegel RJ (2002) The usefulness of a 10% air-10% blood-80% saline mixture for contrast echocardiography: Doppler measurement of pulmonary artery systolic pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:124–129PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Beard JT II, Byrd BF III (1988) Saline contrast enhancement of trivial Doppler tricuspid regurgitation signals for estimating pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Cardiol 62:486–488PubMedCrossRef Beard JT II, Byrd BF III (1988) Saline contrast enhancement of trivial Doppler tricuspid regurgitation signals for estimating pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Cardiol 62:486–488PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter T, Xie F (2007) Contrast ultrasound imaging: methods, analysis, and applications. In: Otto C (ed) The practice of clinical echocardiography, 3rd edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 62–85 Porter T, Xie F (2007) Contrast ultrasound imaging: methods, analysis, and applications. In: Otto C (ed) The practice of clinical echocardiography, 3rd edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 62–85
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aduen JF, Castello R, Daniels JT, Diaz JA, Safford RE, Heckman MG, Crook JE, Burger CD (2011) Accuracy and precision of three echocardiographic methods for estimating mean pulmonary artery pressure. Chest 139:347–352. doi:10.1378/chest.10-0126 PubMedCrossRef Aduen JF, Castello R, Daniels JT, Diaz JA, Safford RE, Heckman MG, Crook JE, Burger CD (2011) Accuracy and precision of three echocardiographic methods for estimating mean pulmonary artery pressure. Chest 139:347–352. doi:10.​1378/​chest.​10-0126 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Bierig SM, Burns PN, Castello R, Coon PD, Hagen ME, Jollis JG, Kimball TR, Kitzman DW, Kronzon I, Labovitz AJ, Lang RM, Mathew J, Moir WS, Nagueh SF, Pearlman AS, Perez JE, Porter TR, Rosenbloom J, Strachan GM, Thanigaraj S, Wei K, Woo A, Yu EH, Zoghbi WA, American Society of E (2008) American society of echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:1179–1201. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.009 quiz 1281PubMedCrossRef Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Bierig SM, Burns PN, Castello R, Coon PD, Hagen ME, Jollis JG, Kimball TR, Kitzman DW, Kronzon I, Labovitz AJ, Lang RM, Mathew J, Moir WS, Nagueh SF, Pearlman AS, Perez JE, Porter TR, Rosenbloom J, Strachan GM, Thanigaraj S, Wei K, Woo A, Yu EH, Zoghbi WA, American Society of E (2008) American society of echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:1179–1201. doi:10.​1016/​j.​echo.​2008.​09.​009 quiz 1281PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishii M, Kato H, Inoue O, Takagi J, Akagi T, Miyake T, Sugimura T, Maeno Y, Hashino K, Kawano T (1996) Noninvasive evaluation of systolic pressures of pulmonary artery and right ventricle using contrast-enhanced Doppler echocardiography: comparative study using sonicated albumin or glucose solution. Pediatr Cardiol 17:175–180PubMedCrossRef Ishii M, Kato H, Inoue O, Takagi J, Akagi T, Miyake T, Sugimura T, Maeno Y, Hashino K, Kawano T (1996) Noninvasive evaluation of systolic pressures of pulmonary artery and right ventricle using contrast-enhanced Doppler echocardiography: comparative study using sonicated albumin or glucose solution. Pediatr Cardiol 17:175–180PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson MC, Eriksson P, Guron CW, Dellborg M (2010) Pitfalls in diagnosing PFO: characteristics of false-negative contrast injections during transesophageal echocardiography in patients with patent foramen ovales. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1136–1142. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.004 PubMedCrossRef Johansson MC, Eriksson P, Guron CW, Dellborg M (2010) Pitfalls in diagnosing PFO: characteristics of false-negative contrast injections during transesophageal echocardiography in patients with patent foramen ovales. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1136–1142. doi:10.​1016/​j.​echo.​2010.​08.​004 PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG (1998) Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S157–S160PubMedCrossRef Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG (1998) Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S157–S160PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaweera AR, Edwards N, Glasheen WP, Villanueva FS, Abbott RD, Kaul S (1994) In vivo myocardial kinetics of air-filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. Circ Res 74:1157–1165PubMedCrossRef Jayaweera AR, Edwards N, Glasheen WP, Villanueva FS, Abbott RD, Kaul S (1994) In vivo myocardial kinetics of air-filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. Circ Res 74:1157–1165PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei K, Skyba DM, Firschke C, Jayaweera AR, Lindner JR, Kaul S (1997) Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1081–1088PubMedCrossRef Wei K, Skyba DM, Firschke C, Jayaweera AR, Lindner JR, Kaul S (1997) Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1081–1088PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan S, Nagai T, Luo H, Atar S, Naqvi T, Birnbaum Y, Lee S, Siegel RJ (1999) Superiority of the combination of blood and agitated saline for routine contrast enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:94–98PubMedCrossRef Fan S, Nagai T, Luo H, Atar S, Naqvi T, Birnbaum Y, Lee S, Siegel RJ (1999) Superiority of the combination of blood and agitated saline for routine contrast enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:94–98PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Feinstein SB, Ten Cate FJ, Zwehl W, Ong K, Maurer G, Tei C, Shah PM, Meerbaum S, Corday E (1984) Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents. J Am Coll Cardiol 3:14–20PubMedCrossRef Feinstein SB, Ten Cate FJ, Zwehl W, Ong K, Maurer G, Tei C, Shah PM, Meerbaum S, Corday E (1984) Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents. J Am Coll Cardiol 3:14–20PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Buttignoni SC, Khorsand A, Mundigler G, Bergler-Klein J, Heger M, Zehetgruber M, Baumgartner H, Binder T (2004) Agitated saline versus polygelatine for the echocardiographic assessment of patent foramen ovale. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:1059–1065. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2004.06.010 PubMedCrossRef Buttignoni SC, Khorsand A, Mundigler G, Bergler-Klein J, Heger M, Zehetgruber M, Baumgartner H, Binder T (2004) Agitated saline versus polygelatine for the echocardiographic assessment of patent foramen ovale. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:1059–1065. doi:10.​1016/​j.​echo.​2004.​06.​010 PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan HC, Fung KC, Kritharides L (2002) Agitated colloid is superior to saline and equivalent to levovist in enhancing tricuspid regurgitation Doppler envelope and in the opacification of right heart chambers: a quantitative, qualitative, and cost-effectiveness study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:309–315PubMedCrossRef Tan HC, Fung KC, Kritharides L (2002) Agitated colloid is superior to saline and equivalent to levovist in enhancing tricuspid regurgitation Doppler envelope and in the opacification of right heart chambers: a quantitative, qualitative, and cost-effectiveness study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:309–315PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura ET, Darby TD, Krause RA, Brondyk HD (1971) Parenteral toxicity studies with benzyl alcohol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 18:60–68PubMedCrossRef Kimura ET, Darby TD, Krause RA, Brondyk HD (1971) Parenteral toxicity studies with benzyl alcohol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 18:60–68PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Novak E, Stubbs SS, Sanborn EC, Eustice RM (1972) The tolerance and safety of intravenously administered benzyl alcohol in methylprednisolone sodium succinate formulations in normal human subjects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 23:54–61PubMedCrossRef Novak E, Stubbs SS, Sanborn EC, Eustice RM (1972) The tolerance and safety of intravenously administered benzyl alcohol in methylprednisolone sodium succinate formulations in normal human subjects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 23:54–61PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson JP, Solimando DA Jr, Edwards MS (1986) Parenteral benzyl alcohol-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 20:689–691PubMed Wilson JP, Solimando DA Jr, Edwards MS (1986) Parenteral benzyl alcohol-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 20:689–691PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal MK, Roy I, Amin A, Banerjee UC, Bansal AK (2010) Stabilization of lysozyme by benzyl alcohol: surface tension and thermodynamic parameters. J Pharm Sci 99:4149–4161. doi:10.1002/jps.22129 PubMedCrossRef Goyal MK, Roy I, Amin A, Banerjee UC, Bansal AK (2010) Stabilization of lysozyme by benzyl alcohol: surface tension and thermodynamic parameters. J Pharm Sci 99:4149–4161. doi:10.​1002/​jps.​22129 PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is bacteriostatic saline superior to normal saline as an echocardiographic contrast agent?
verfasst von
Shaun Cardozo
Prasad Gunasekaran
Hena Patel
Timothy McGorisk
Mehrdad Toosi
Haroon Faraz
Sandip Zalawadiya
Issa Alesh
Anupama Kottam
Luis Afonso
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0493-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.