Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2018

23.01.2018 | Original Article

Is Salvage of Recently Infected Breast Implant After Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction Possible? An Experimental Study

verfasst von: P. Castus, O. Heymans, P. Melin, L. Renwart, C. Henrist, E. Hayton, S. Mordon, F. M. Leclère

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction remains controversial. In this experimental study, the authors tried to remove bacteria, and their biofilm, from the colonized surface of breast prostheses, without damaging their integrity.

Materials and Methods

A total of 112 shell samples of silicone breast prostheses, smooth (SPSS) and textured (TPSS), were colonized by S. epidermidis (SE) or S. aureus (SA) strains, all able to produce biofilms. After 15 days, all the samples were removed from the contaminated culture broth and constituted 4 groups of 20 contaminated samples: SPSS/SE (group I), SPSS/SA (group II), TPSS/SE (group III), TPSS/SE (group IV). In another group—group SEM−, 16 colonized samples were used for documentation with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining 16 samples were used to test the limits of detection of the sterility test. All samples of groups I–IV and 8 samples of group SEM were « washed » with a smooth brush in a povidone-iodine bath and rinsed with saline solution. A subset of the washed samples was sent for SEM and the others were immersed in sterile broth and were incubated at 35 °C for 3 weeks (groups I–IV).

Results

Fifteen days after contamination, all the samples in groups I–IV were colonized. In the SEM group, SEM images attested to the presence of bacteria in biofilm attached to the shells. After cleaning, SEM did not reveal any bacteria and there was no visible alteration in the outer structure of the shell. Sterility tests performed after decontamination in groups I–IV remained negative for all the samples.

Conclusion

Breast prostheses recently contaminated with Staphylococci, frequently involved in peri-prosthetic breast implant infection and capable of producing biofilms, can be efficiently decontaminated by the procedure used in this study. Our decontamination procedure did not alter the surface structure of the prostheses. This decontamination procedure could allow reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction and when a salvage procedure is indicated.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3,002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:325–329CrossRef Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3,002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:325–329CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D (2005) Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5:94–106CrossRefPubMed Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D (2005) Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5:94–106CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown SL, Hefflin B, Woo EK, Parmentier CM (2001) Infections related to breast implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1977–1997. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 11:1–12CrossRefPubMed Brown SL, Hefflin B, Woo EK, Parmentier CM (2001) Infections related to breast implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1977–1997. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 11:1–12CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, Baldelli I, De Maria A, Marchese A (2015) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients. BMC Microbiol 15:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, Baldelli I, De Maria A, Marchese A (2015) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients. BMC Microbiol 15:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infection around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816CrossRefPubMed Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infection around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson JR, Kandola S, Hignett SP, Teasdale RL, Topps AR, Pennick M, Hwang M, Barnes N, Kirwan CC (2017) Infection prophylaxis for breast implant surgery: could we do better? Eplasty 14:17–19 Henderson JR, Kandola S, Hignett SP, Teasdale RL, Topps AR, Pennick M, Hwang M, Barnes N, Kirwan CC (2017) Infection prophylaxis for breast implant surgery: could we do better? Eplasty 14:17–19
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohmeyer JA, Alawadi M, Bergmann PA, Schmauss D, Wittig KS (2017) Adequate antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy of periprosthetic infections of the breast—review of 468 consecutive implant removals. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 49:91–102CrossRefPubMed Lohmeyer JA, Alawadi M, Bergmann PA, Schmauss D, Wittig KS (2017) Adequate antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy of periprosthetic infections of the breast—review of 468 consecutive implant removals. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 49:91–102CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart A, Desai K, Yoo J, Losken A (2017) Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 37:35–43CrossRefPubMed Hart A, Desai K, Yoo J, Losken A (2017) Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 37:35–43CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanger JR, Sheth NK, Franson TR (1990) Adherence of microorganisms to breast prostheses: an in vitro study. Ann Plast Surg 22:337–342CrossRef Sanger JR, Sheth NK, Franson TR (1990) Adherence of microorganisms to breast prostheses: an in vitro study. Ann Plast Surg 22:337–342CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ III (1997) Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336:677–682CrossRefPubMed Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ III (1997) Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336:677–682CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Darouiche RO (2004) Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med 350:1422–1429CrossRefPubMed Darouiche RO (2004) Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med 350:1422–1429CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun JK, Chulman MR (2007) The infected breast prosthesis after mastectomy reconstruction: successful salvage of nine implants in eight consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:581–589CrossRefPubMed Chun JK, Chulman MR (2007) The infected breast prosthesis after mastectomy reconstruction: successful salvage of nine implants in eight consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:581–589CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Planas J, Car bonell A, Planas J (1995) Salvaging the exposed mammary prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 19:535–540CrossRef Planas J, Car bonell A, Planas J (1995) Salvaging the exposed mammary prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 19:535–540CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherif RD, Ingargiola M, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Torina PJ, Harmaty MA (2017) Use of antibiotic beads to salvage infected breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Epub May 22 Sherif RD, Ingargiola M, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Torina PJ, Harmaty MA (2017) Use of antibiotic beads to salvage infected breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Epub May 22
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS (2013) Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1223–1230CrossRefPubMed Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS (2013) Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1223–1230CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal S, Ettinger RE, Kung TA, Kozlow JH, Brown DL (2017) Cohort study of immediate implant exchange during acute infection in the setting of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:865–870CrossRefPubMed Agarwal S, Ettinger RE, Kung TA, Kozlow JH, Brown DL (2017) Cohort study of immediate implant exchange during acute infection in the setting of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:865–870CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat De Lorenzi C (2005) Successful treatment of acute periprosthetic breast infection with curettage, pulse lavage, and immediate device exchange. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:400–403CrossRef De Lorenzi C (2005) Successful treatment of acute periprosthetic breast infection with curettage, pulse lavage, and immediate device exchange. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:400–403CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH (1983) Experimental foreign body infections in mice challenged with slime-producing Staphylococcus Epidermidis. Infect Immun 40:407–410PubMedPubMedCentral Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH (1983) Experimental foreign body infections in mice challenged with slime-producing Staphylococcus Epidermidis. Infect Immun 40:407–410PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies DG, Geesey GG (1995) Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:860–865PubMedPubMedCentral Davies DG, Geesey GG (1995) Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:860–865PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistant infections. Science 284:1318–1322CrossRefPubMed Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistant infections. Science 284:1318–1322CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhardt BR (2004) Detection of subclinical infections in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:448CrossRefPubMed Burkhardt BR (2004) Detection of subclinical infections in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:448CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Netscher DT (2004) Subclinical infection as a possible cause of significant breast capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2229–2230CrossRefPubMed Netscher DT (2004) Subclinical infection as a possible cause of significant breast capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2229–2230CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745CrossRefPubMed Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O (1997) Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. Dermatology 195:14–18CrossRefPubMed Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O (1997) Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. Dermatology 195:14–18CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zambacos GJ, Nguyen D, Morris RJ (2004) Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:706–710CrossRefPubMed Zambacos GJ, Nguyen D, Morris RJ (2004) Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:706–710CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernardi C, Saccomanno F (1998) Late Klebsiella pneumoniae infection following breast augmentation: case report. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:222–224CrossRef Bernardi C, Saccomanno F (1998) Late Klebsiella pneumoniae infection following breast augmentation: case report. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:222–224CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchese A, Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, De Maria A (2016) Breast implant infection due to Paenibacillus residui in a cancer patient. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:743–744CrossRefPubMed Marchese A, Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, De Maria A (2016) Breast implant infection due to Paenibacillus residui in a cancer patient. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:743–744CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brickman M, Parsa AA, Parsa FD (2005) Mycobacterium cheloneae infection after breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:116–118CrossRef Brickman M, Parsa AA, Parsa FD (2005) Mycobacterium cheloneae infection after breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:116–118CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenne A, Defourny L, Lafosse A, Martin M, Vandercam B, Berlière M, Lengelé B, Rodriguez-Villalobos H (2016) Breast prosthesis infection and pets: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 22:98–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lenne A, Defourny L, Lafosse A, Martin M, Vandercam B, Berlière M, Lengelé B, Rodriguez-Villalobos H (2016) Breast prosthesis infection and pets: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 22:98–100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Is Salvage of Recently Infected Breast Implant After Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction Possible? An Experimental Study
verfasst von
P. Castus
O. Heymans
P. Melin
L. Renwart
C. Henrist
E. Hayton
S. Mordon
F. M. Leclère
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1037-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.