nach oben

International Journal of Public Health

Erschienen in:

02.09.2020 | Original article

Is the ‘Nordic Paradox’ an illusion? Measuring intimate partner violence against women in Europe

verfasst von: Iñaki Permanyer, Amalia Gomez-Casillas

Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Recent studies suggest that intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in Europe is highest among some of the most gender egalitarian countries in the world, like Sweden, Finland and Denmark. This paper aims at disentangling the so-called Nordic Paradox.

Methods

We have decomposed traditional IPV indicators into a ‘previous partner’ and ‘current partner’ components and presented new IPV indicators that are sensitive to the frequency of victimization. The new indicators are based on aggregated data from Agency for Fundamental Rights Survey on violence against women for the 28 EU Member States.

Results

The country rankings in terms of IPV levels change substantially when overall prevalence measures are substituted by their ‘previous partner’ and ‘current partner’ components and, especially, when considering the frequency of victimization. When comparing the traditional IPV prevalence ranking with the current partner violence repetition-sensitive indicator ranking, the Nordic countries fall several positions.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the prevalence of IPV tends to be higher in more gender egalitarian countries because union formation and dissolution occur more often, but not because men are necessarily more violent against their partners.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bowen E, Gilchrist EA, Beech AR (2005) An examination of the impact of community-based rehabilitation on the offending behaviour of male domestic violence offenders and the characteristics associated with recidivism. Leg Criminol Psychol 10:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X36778CrossRef

Bybee D, Sullivan CM (2005) Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. Am J Commun Psychol 36(1/2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6234-5CrossRef

EIGE—European Institute for Gender Equality (2015) Gender Equality Index 2015. Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union

EIGE—European Institute for Gender Equality (2017) Gender Equality Index 2017. Measurement framework of violence against women. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. http://doi.org/10.2839/652585

Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C (2008) Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet371(9619):1165-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X

FRA—European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Main results. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2811/981927

FRA—European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2015) European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA): Violence Against Women survey, 2012: Special Licence Access. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 7730. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7730-1

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Watts C, Ellsberg M (2005) WHO multi country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. World Health Organisation, Geneva

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C (2006) Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 368(9551):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8CrossRef

Gracia E, Merlo J (2016) Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Soc Sci Med Elsevier Ltd 157:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.040CrossRef

Gracia E, Martín-Fernández M, Lila M, Merlo J, Ivert AK (2019) Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in Sweden and Spain: a psychometric study of the “Nordic paradox”. PLoS ONE 14(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217015CrossRef

Heise L, Kostsadam A (2015) Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. Lancet Glob Health 3:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3CrossRef

Ivert AK, Gracia E, Lila M, Wemrell M, Merlo J (2019) Does country-level gender equality explain individual risk of intimate partner violence against women? A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) in the European Union. Eur J Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Martín-Fernández M, Gracia E, Lila M (2019) Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study. BMC Public Health 19:1739. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7998-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sanz-Barbero B, Corradi C, Otero-García L, Ayala A, Vives-Cases C (2018) The effect of macrosocial policies on violence against women: a multilevel study in 28 European Countries. Int J Public Health 63(8):901–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1143-1CrossRefPubMed

Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C et al (2013) The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet 382(9895):859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2CrossRefPubMed

Walby S, Towers J, Francis B (2014) Mainstreaming domestic and gender-based violence into sociology and the criminology of violence. Sociol Rev 62(2014):187–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Walby S, Towers J, Francis B (2015) is violent crime increasing or decreasing? A new methodology to measure repeat attacks making visible the significance of gender and domestic relations. Br J Criminol. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv131CrossRef

Walby S, Towers J, Balderston S, Corradi C, Francis B, Heiskanen M et al (2017) The concept and measurement of violence against women and men. Policy Press, BristolCrossRef

Wemrell M, Stjernlöf S, Aenishänslin J, Lila M, Gracia E, Ivert AK (2019) Towards understanding the Nordic paradox: a review of qualitative interview studies on intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW). Swed Sociol Compass 13:e12699. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12699CrossRef

WHO—World Health Organization (2013) Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization, Geneva

Yllö K (1984) The status of women, marital equality and violence against wives. J Fam Issues 5(3):307–320CrossRef

Titel: Is the ‘Nordic Paradox’ an illusion? Measuring intimate partner violence against women in Europe
verfasst von: Iñaki Permanyer
Amalia Gomez-Casillas
Publikationsdatum: 02.09.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01457-5

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Medical labour under neoliberalism: an ethnographic study in Colombia

Universal health coverage and capital accumulation: a relationship unveiled by the critical political economy approach

Private money-making indulgence and inefficiency of primary healthcare in Nigeria: a qualitative study of health workers’ absenteeism

Association between parental self-reported knowledge on soy and phytoestrogen and their children's intake of soy-based infant formulae—a cross-sectional study of Israeli parents

Late presenters among minority patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in the USA

Flu pandemic, world power, and contemporary capitalism: building a historical–critical perspective