Skip to main content
Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2017

03.12.2016 | Original Article

Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study

verfasst von: F. A. de Boer, P. M. van Kampen, P. E. Huijsmans

Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty becomes more widely used as treatment for patients with complex cuff arthropathy. Theoretically, a higher retroversion of the humeral component leads to an increase in external rotation ROM and a decrease in internal rotation ROM. There is no consensus in optimal retroversion orientation. We retrospectively describe the effect of retroversion of the humeral component. We hypothesize that 20° humeral retroversion improves postoperative ROM, strength or clinical outcome scores compared to neutral retroversion.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study is performed. An Aequalis reverse shoulder prosthesis was placed in 65 shoulders from 58 patients with a mean age of 73.8 years (95% CI 72.0–75.6). Between October 2006 and May 2012, the humeral component was placed in neutral retroversion in 36 shoulders (55%). From June 2012 to June 2014, it was placed in 20° retroversion in 29 shoulders (45%). After a mean follow-up of 36 months with a minimum of 12 months, patients were invited for a study visit. ROM, strength, Constant-Murley and Oxford Scores were measured.

Results

ROM, strength and Constant-Murley and Oxford Scores did not differ significantly between both groups.

Conclusions

With the Aequalis prosthesis, no significant effect of 0° or 20° retroversion on external and internal rotation ROM, strength or functional outcome scores was found.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68PubMed Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16:65–68PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gulotta LV, Choi D, Marinello P, Knutson Z, Lipman J, Wright T, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Warren RF (2012) Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1121–1127. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.027 CrossRef Gulotta LV, Choi D, Marinello P, Knutson Z, Lipman J, Wright T, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Warren RF (2012) Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:1121–1127. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2011.​07.​027 CrossRef
6.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2013) Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:887–894. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.008 CrossRefPubMed Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2013) Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:887–894. doi:10.​1016/​j.​otsr.​2013.​08.​008 CrossRefPubMed
9.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:593–600PubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:593–600PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, Joukainen A, Aärimaa V (2013) Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1650–1655. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.002 CrossRef Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, Joukainen A, Aärimaa V (2013) Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1650–1655. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2013.​05.​002 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2014) Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:151–158. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.009 CrossRef Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2014) Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:151–158. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2013.​05.​009 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study
verfasst von
F. A. de Boer
P. M. van Kampen
P. E. Huijsmans
Publikationsdatum
03.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Elektronische ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0443-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.