nach oben

Die Kardiologie

Erschienen in:

02.05.2018 | Koronare Herzerkrankung | CME

Aktueller Stellenwert der kardialen Computertomographie in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung

Update 2018

verfasst von: Dr. med. C. Tesche, U. Ebersberger, E. Hoffmann, T. Henzler

Erschienen in: Die Kardiologie | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die kardiale Computertomographie mit Kalziumscoring zur Quantifizierung des Koronarkalks und kontrastmittelgestützter CT-Angiographie (cCTA) zur nichtinvasiven morphologischen und funktionellen Beurteilung von Koronarstenosen ist ein etabliertes Verfahren in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung (KHK) und der zielgerichteten interventionellen Behandlung. Die kardiale Computertomographie eignet sich bei Patienten mit niedriger bis intermediärer Vortestwahrscheinlichkeit zur Risikostratifizierung (Kalziumscoring) und zum Ausschluss einer KHK mittels cCTA. Die rein anatomische Darstellung von Koronarstenosen kann zukünftig durch funktionelle Analysen aufgrund neuer technischer Entwicklungen ergänzt werden und erlaubt somit neben einer morphologischen Beurteilung eine Aussage über die hämodynamische Signifikanz von Koronarstenosen. Durch die vielversprechende kombinierte anatomische und funktionelle Diagnostik könnte der kardialen Computertomographie in Zukunft eine wesentliche Gatekeeper-Funktion hinsichtlich der Indikationsstellung für Koronarinterventionen zukommen.

Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr., Watson K, Wilson PW, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G (2014) 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2889–2934CrossRefPubMed

Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED (2017) The updated NICE guidelines: cardiac CT as the first-line test for coronary artery disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 10:15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alkadhi H, Leschka S (2011) Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography—what has been achieved and what needs to be done. Eur Radiol 21:505–509CrossRefPubMed

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schomig A (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310CrossRefPubMed

Takx RA, Moscariello A, Schoepf UJ, Barraza JM Jr., Nance JW Jr., Bastarrika G, Das M, Meyer M, Wildberger JE, Schoenberg SO, Fink C, Henzler T (2012) Quantification of left and right ventricular function and myocardial mass: comparison of low-radiation dose 2nd generation dual-source CT and cardiac MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:e598–e604CrossRefPubMed

Meyer M, Haubenreisser H, Schoepf UJ, Vliegenthart R, Leidecker C, Allmendinger T, Lehmann R, Sudarski S, Borggrefe M, Schoenberg SO, Henzler T (2014) Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV-initial comparison of a second—versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology 273:373–382CrossRefPubMed

Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr., Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed

McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, Post W, Kronmal RA (2006) Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 113:30–37CrossRefPubMed

Victor RG, Haley RW, Willett DL, Peshock RM, Vaeth PC, Leonard D, Basit M, Cooper RS, Iannacchione VG, Visscher WA, Staab JM, Hobbs HH, Dallas Heart Study I (2004) The Dallas Heart Study: a population-based probability sample for the multidisciplinary study of ethnic differences in cardiovascular health. Am J Cardiol 93:1473–1480CrossRefPubMed

10.

Erbel R, Mohlenkamp S, Moebus S, Schmermund A, Lehmann N, Stang A, Dragano N, Gronemeyer D, Seibel R, Kalsch H, Brocker-Preuss M, Mann K, Siegrist J, Jockel KH, Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigative G (2010) Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1397–1406CrossRefPubMed

11.

Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, Kim J, Miranda-Peats L, Wong ND, Rana JS, Orakzai R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, Polk D, Min J, Budoff MJ, Berman DS (2011) Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (early identification of subclinical atherosclerosis by noninvasive imaging research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1622–1632CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Narula J, Yankelevitz D, Abbara S (2017) 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology. J Thorac Imaging 32:W54–W66CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Agatston A, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Dill KE, Jacobs JE, Maroules CD, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Schoepf UJ, Shaw LJ, Stillman AE, White CS, Woodard PK, Leipsic JA (2016) CAD-RADSTM coronary artery disease - reporting and data system. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American college of radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:269–281CrossRefPubMed

14.

Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC (2011) Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1237–1247CrossRefPubMed

15.

Investigators S‑H (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet 385:2383–2391CrossRef

16.

Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Lee KL, Mark DB, Al-Khalidi HR, Anstrom K, Dolor RJ, Kosinski A, Krucoff MW, Mudrick DW, Patel MR, Picard MH, Udelson JE, Velazquez EJ, Cooper L, investigators P (2014) PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial. Am Heart J 167(6):796–803.e1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, Chen L, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Cheng V, Chinnaiyan KM, Delago A, Dunning A, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann P, Lin F, Maffei E, Raff GL, Shaw LJ, Villines TC, Min JK, Investigators C (2011) Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:463–472CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hamilton-Craig C, Fifoot A, Hansen M, Pincus M, Chan J, Walters DL, Branch KR (2014) Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG—a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE). Int J Cardiol 177:867–873CrossRefPubMed

19.

Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O’Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL, Investigators C‑S (2011) The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1414–1422CrossRefPubMed

20.

Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, Singh H, Miller CD, Entrikin DW, Leaming JM, Gavin LJ, Pacella CB, Hollander JE (2012) CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 366:1393–1403CrossRefPubMed

21.

Meinel FG, Nance JW Jr., Harris BS, De Cecco CN, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2014) Radiation risks from cardiovascular imaging tests. Circulation 130:442–445CrossRefPubMed

22.

McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Carter RE, Katzberg RW, Kallmes DF, Williamson EE (2014) Risk of intravenous contrast material-mediated acute kidney injury: a propensity score-matched study stratified by baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 271:65–73CrossRefPubMed

23.

Tesche C, Plank F, De Cecco CN, Duguay TM, Albrecht MH, Varga-Szemes A, Bayer RRN, Yang J, Jacks IL, Gramer BM, Ebersberger U, Hoffmann E, Chiaramida SA, Feuchtner G, Schoepf UJ (2016) Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:458–465CrossRefPubMed

24.

Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H, Sato T, Inoue K, Okumura M, Ishii J, Anno H, Virmani R, Ozaki Y, Hishida H, Narula J (2007) Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:319–326CrossRefPubMed

25.

Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, Tittus J, Schwarz F, D’Anastasi M, Marcus RP, Schenzle J, Becker C, Nikolaou K, Becker A (2013) CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart 99:1004–1011CrossRefPubMed

26.

Pelgrim GJ, Dorrius M, Xie X, den Dekker MA, Schoepf UJ, Henzler T, Oudkerk M, Vliegenthart R (2015) The dream of a one-stop-shop: meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.032 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Danad I, Szymonifka J, Schulman-Marcus J, Min JK (2016) Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:836–844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Albrecht MH, Duguay TM, Bayer RR 2nd, Litwin SE, Steinberg DH, Schoepf UJ (2017) Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Radiology 285:17–33CrossRefPubMed

29.

Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, Min JK (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (diagnosis of ischemia-causing stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1989–1997CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, Gransar H, Koo BK, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Budoff MJ, Malpeso J, Leipsic J, Min JK (2013) Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:881–889CrossRefPubMed

31.

Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, Osawa K, Marwan M, Naber C, Erglis A, Park SJ, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S, Group NXTTS (2014) Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1145–1155CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gonzalez JA, Lipinski MJ, Flors L, Shaw PW, Kramer CM, Salerno M (2015) Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 116:1469–1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Norgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, Ito H, Miyoshi T, Park SJ, Zvaigzne L, Tzemos N, Jensen JM, Hansson N, Ko B, Bezerra H, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S (2015) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1045–1055CrossRefPubMed

34.

Kim KH, Doh JH, Koo BK, Min JK, Erglis A, Yang HM, Park KW, Lee HY, Kang HJ, Kim YJ, Lee SY, Kim HS (2014) A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:72–78CrossRefPubMed

35.

Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Chiswell K, Cyr D, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, Hlatky MA, Investigators P (2016) 1‑year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:435–445CrossRefPubMed

36.

Curzen NP, Nolan J, Zaman AG, Norgaard BL, Rajani R (2016) Does the routine availability of CT-derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.026 PubMedCrossRef

37.

Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, Douglas PS, Investigators P (2015) Quality-of-life and economic outcomes of assessing fractional flow reserve with computed tomography angiography: PLATFORM. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:2315–2323CrossRefPubMed

38.

Min J (2014) Computed tomographic evaluation of atherosclerotic determinants of myocardial ischemia (CREDENCE). ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02173275). Zugegriffen: 16.12.2017

39.

Min J (2014) Dual energy CT for ischemia determination compared to „gold standard“ non-invasive and invasive techniques (DECIDE-gold). ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02178904). Zugegriffen: 16.12.2017

40.

Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Mushtaq S, Baggiano A, Beltrama V, Trabattoni D, Ferrari C, Calligaris G, Teruzzi G, Fabbiocchi F, Lualdi A, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M (2016) Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography perfusion versus fractional flow reserve measured by computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease) prospective study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:330–334CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Aktueller Stellenwert der kardialen Computertomographie in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung
Update 2018
verfasst von: Dr. med. C. Tesche
U. Ebersberger
E. Hoffmann
T. Henzler
Publikationsdatum: 02.05.2018
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Schlagwörter: Koronare Herzerkrankung
EKG
Computertomografie
Krankheiten der Arterien
EKG
Computertomografie
Gefäß-CT
Erschienen in: Die Kardiologie / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2731-7129
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7137
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-018-0251-8

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Aktueller Stellenwert der kardialen Computertomographie in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung

Update 2018

Zusammenfassung

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Innere Medizin

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Persistierendes Foramen ovale und Operation – Schlaganfall vorprogrammiert?

Vom Älterwerden der Koronararterien

Weiterbildung und Zertifizierung in kardiovaskulärer Magnetresonanztomographie in Deutschland

Junge Patienten mit Myokardinfarkt: Empfehlungen zu den Leitlinien

Retroperitoneales Hämatom nach Koronarintervention – gefährlich und vermeidbar!

Prasugrel oder Ticagrelor beim akuten Herzinfarkt?

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Innere Medizin