nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

19.02.2016

Laparoscopic splenectomy is a better surgical approach for spleen-relevant disorders: a comprehensive meta-analysis based on 15-year literatures

verfasst von: Ji Cheng, Kaixiong Tao, Peiwu Yu

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Currently, whether laparoscopic or open splenectomy is a gold standard option for spleen abnormalities remains in controversy. There is in deficiency of academic evidence concerning the surgical efficacy and safety of both comparative managements. In order to surgically appraise the applied potentials of both approaches, we hence performed this comprehensive meta-analysis on the basis of 15-year literatures.

Methods

Via searching of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, overall 37 original articles were eligibly incorporated into our meta-analysis and subdivided into six sections. In accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration protocol, all statistical procedures were mathematically conducted in a standard manner. Publication bias was additionally evaluated by funnel plot and Egger’s test.

Results

Irrespective of the diversified splenic disorders, laparoscopic splenectomy was superior to open technique owing to its fewer estimated blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay as well as lower complication rate (P < 0.05). As for operative duration and perioperative mortality, a statistical similarity was observed amid both surgical measures (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Technically, laparoscopic splenectomy should be recommended as a prior remedy with its advantage of rapid recovery and minimally physical damage, in addition to its comparably surgical efficacy against that of open manipulation.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Feldman LS (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: standardized approach. World J Surg 35(7):1487–1495. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1059-x PubMedCrossRef

Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, Delaitre B, Gigot JF, Leandros E, Lechner K, Rhodes M, Silecchia G, Szold A, Targarona E, Torelli P, Neugebauer E (2008) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the european association for endoscopic surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 22(4):821–848. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9735-5 PubMedCrossRef

Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B, Kau KB, Donaldson N, Rhodes MR, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (2003) Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 238(2):235–240. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000080826.97026.d8 PubMedPubMedCentral

Al-Mulhim AS (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly in benign hematological diseases. Surg Endosc 26(11):3186–3189. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2314-4 PubMedCrossRef

Xu J, Zhao L, Wang Z, Zhai B, Liu C (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly combining gastroesophageal devascularization using conventional instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(5):e183. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000073 PubMedCrossRef

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Yong F, Chen W, Lan P, Youcheng Z (2014) Applications of laparoscopic technique in spleen surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(12):1713–1716PubMed

Ahad S, Gonczy C, Advani V, Markwell S, Hassan I (2013) True benefit or selection bias: an analysis of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy from the ACS-NSQIP. Surg Endosc 27(6):1865–1871. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2727-0 PubMedCrossRef

Bulus H, Mahmoud H, Altun H, Tas A, Karayalcin K (2013) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 84(1):38–42. doi:10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.38 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Oomen MW, Bakx R, van Minden M, van Rijn RR, Peters M, Heij HA (2013) Implementation of laparoscopic splenectomy in children and the incidence of portal vein thrombosis diagnosed by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Surg 48(11):2276–2280. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.078 PubMedCrossRef

11.

Barbaros U, Dinccag A, Sumer A, Vecchio R, Rusello D, Randazzo V, Issever H, Avci C (2010) Prospective randomized comparison of clinical results between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open splenectomies. Surg Endosc 24(1):25–32. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0528-x PubMedCrossRef

12.

Canda AE, Sucullu I, Ozsoy Y, Filiz AI, Kurt Y, Demirbas S, Inan I (2009) Hospital experience, body image, and cosmesis after laparoscopic or open splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(6):479–483. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181c3ff24 PubMedCrossRef

13.

Boddy AP, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2006) Does open surgery continue to have a role in elective splenectomy? Surg Endosc 20(7):1094–1098. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0523-9 PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Kubota M, Ikenaga M, Yamamoto H, Fujiwara Y, Ohue M, Yasuda T, Imamura H, Tatsuta M, Yano M, Furukawa H, Monden M (2005) High incidence of thrombosis of the portal venous system after laparoscopic splenectomy: a prospective study with contrast-enhanced CT scan. Ann Surg 241(2):208–216PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Qureshi FG, Ergun O, Sandulache VC, Nadler EP, Ford HR, Hackam DJ, Kane TD (2005) Laparoscopic splenectomy in children. JSLS 9(4):389–392PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Hamamci EO, Besim H, Bostanoglu S, Sonisik M, Korkmaz A (2002) Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(4):253–258. doi:10.1089/109264202760268023 PubMedCrossRef

17.

Minkes RK, Lagzdins M, Langer JC (2000) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 35(5):699–701. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2000.6010 PubMedCrossRef

18.

Kucuk C, Sozuer E, Ok E, Altuntas F, Yilmaz Z (2005) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the management of benign and malign hematologic diseases: a ten-year single-center experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(2):135–139. doi:10.1089/lap.2005.15.135 PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sapucahy MV, Faintuch J, Bresciani CJ, Bertevello PL, Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues JJ (2003) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 58(5):243–249PubMedCrossRef

20.

Velanovich V, Shurafa MS (2001) Clinical and quality of life outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenectomy for haematological diseases. Eur J Surg 167(1):23–28. doi:10.1080/110241501750069774 PubMedCrossRef

21.

Donini A, Baccarani U, Terrosu G, Corno V, Ermacora A, Pasqualucci A, Bresadola F (1999) Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases. Surg Endosc 13(12):1220–1225PubMedCrossRef

22.

Zhe C, Jian-wei L, Jian C, Yu-dong F, Ping B, Shu-guang W, Shu-guo Z (2013) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for bleeding varices or severe hypersplenism: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 17(4):654–659. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2150-4 PubMedCrossRef

23.

Swanson TW, Meneghetti AT, Sampath S, Connors JM, Panton ON (2011) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: 20-year experience at a Canadian centre. Can J Surg 54(3):189–193. doi:10.1503/cjs.044109 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Zhou J, Wu Z, Cai Y, Wang Y, Peng B (2011) The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study. J Surg Res 171(1):e55–e60. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.040 PubMedCrossRef

25.

Feldman LS, Demyttenaere SV, Polyhronopoulos GN, Fried GM (2008) Refining the selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):13–19. doi:10.1089/lap.2007.0050 PubMedCrossRef

26.

Owera A, Hamade AM, Bani HO, Ammori BJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(3):241–246. doi:10.1089/lap.2006.16.241 PubMedCrossRef

27.

Qu Y, Xu J, Jiao C, Cheng Z, Ren S (2014) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Int Surg 99(3):286–290. doi:10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00175.1 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

28.

Mohamed SY, Abdel-Nabi I, Inam A, Bakr M, El TK, Saleh AJ, Alzahrani H, Abdu SH (2010) Systemic thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in comparison to open surgery in the absence of anticoagulant prophylaxis. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 3(2):71–77PubMedCrossRef

29.

Sampath S, Meneghetti AT, MacFarlane JK, Nguyen NH, Benny WB, Panton ON (2007) An 18-year review of open and laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Surg 193(5):580–584. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.002 PubMedCrossRef

30.

Ojima H, Kato T, Araki K, Okamura K, Manda R, Hirayama I, Hosouchi Y, Nishida Y, Kuwano H (2006) Factors predicting long-term responses to splenectomy in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. World J Surg 30(4):553–559. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7964-0 PubMedCrossRef

31.

Berends FJ, Schep N, Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ, Kappers-Klunne MC, Huijgens P, Kazemier G (2004) Hematological long-term results of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case control study. Surg Endosc 18(5):766–770. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9140-7 PubMedCrossRef

32.

Cordera F, Long KH, Nagorney DM, McMurtry EK, Schleck C, Ilstrup D, Donohue JH (2003) Open versus laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical and economic analysis. Surgery 134(1):45–52. doi:10.1067/msy.2003.204 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Shimomatsuya T, Horiuchi T (1999) Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Comparison with open splenectomy. Surg Endosc 13(6):563–566PubMedCrossRef

34.

Alwabari A, Parida L, Al-Salem AH (2009) Laparoscopic splenectomy and/or cholecystectomy for children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Surg Int 25(5):417–421. doi:10.1007/s00383-009-2352-8 PubMedCrossRef

35.

Lesher AP, Kalpatthi R, Glenn JB, Jackson SM, Hebra A (2009) Outcome of splenectomy in children younger than 4 years with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Surg 44(6):1134–1138. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.016 PubMedCrossRef

36.

Goers T, Panepinto J, Debaun M, Blinder M, Foglia R, Oldham KT, Field JJ (2008) Laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery in children with sickle cell disease is associated with a shorter hospital stay. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50(3):603–606. doi:10.1002/pbc.21245 PubMedCrossRef

37.

Bai DS, Qian JJ, Chen P, Yao J, Wang XD, Jin SJ, Jiang GQ (2014) Modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension. Surg Endosc 28(1):257–264. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3182-2 PubMedCrossRef

38.

Jiang GQ, Chen P, Qian JJ, Yao J, Wang XD, Jin SJ, Bai DS (2014) Perioperative advantages of modified laparoscopic vs open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection. World J Gastroenterol 20(27):9146–9153. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9146 PubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Wu Z, Zhou J, Pankaj P, Peng B (2012) Laparoscopic and open splenectomy for splenomegaly secondary to liver cirrhosis: an evaluation of immunity. Surg Endosc 26(12):3557–3564. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2366-5 PubMedCrossRef

40.

Zhou J, Wu Z, Pankaj P, Peng B (2012) Long-term postoperative outcomes of hypersplenism: laparoscopic versus open splenectomy secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 26(12):3391–3400. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2349-6 PubMedCrossRef

41.

Cai YQ, Zhou J, Chen XD, Wang YC, Wu Z, Peng B (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy is an effective and safe intervention for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis. Surg Endosc 25(12):3791–3797. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1790-2 PubMedCrossRef

42.

Jiang XZ, Zhao SY, Luo H, Huang B, Wang CS, Chen L, Tao YJ (2009) Laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 15(27):3421–3425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

43.

Xin Z, Qingguang L, Yingmin Y (2009) Total laparoscopic versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization in the management of portal hypertension: a comparative study. Dig Surg 26(6):499–505. doi:10.1159/000236033 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Rijcken E, Mees ST, Bisping G, Krueger K, Bruewer M, Senninger N, Mennigen R (2014) Laparoscopic splenectomy for medically refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a retrospective cohort study on longtime response predicting factors based on consensus criteria. Int J Surg 12(12):1428–1433. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.012 PubMedCrossRef

45.

Montalvo J, Velazquez D, Pantoja JP, Sierra M, Lopez-Karpovitch X, Herrera MF (2014) Laparoscopic splenectomy for primary immune thrombocytopenia: clinical outcome and prognostic factors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(7):466–470. doi:10.1089/lap.2013.0267 PubMedCrossRef

46.

Gamme G, Birch DW, Karmali S (2013) Minimally invasive splenectomy: an update and review. Can J Surg 56(4):280–285PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

47.

Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Kinjo N, Harimoto N, Itoh S, Tsutsumi N, Matsumoto Y, Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2015) Laparoscopic splenectomy with technical standardization and selection criteria for standard or hand-assisted approach in 390 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):354–366. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.011 PubMedCrossRef

48.

Wang WJ, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Chen Q (2015) Prevention and treatment of hemorrhage during laparoscopic splenectomy and devascularization for portal hypertension. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 35(1):99–104. doi:10.1007/s11596-015-1396-3 PubMedCrossRef

49.

Jiang G, Qian J, Yao J, Wang X, Jin S, Bai D (2014) A new technique for laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection. Surg Innov 21(3):256–262. doi:10.1177/1553350613492587 PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Laparoscopic splenectomy is a better surgical approach for spleen-relevant disorders: a comprehensive meta-analysis based on 15-year literatures
verfasst von: Ji Cheng
Kaixiong Tao
Peiwu Yu
Publikationsdatum: 19.02.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4795-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety

Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets

Long-term outcomes of patients with common bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A novel endoscopic fluorescent band ligation method for tumor localization

Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for minimally invasive treatment of single, small hepatocellular carcinomas

Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for caudate lobe: technical strategy and comparative analysis with anteroinferior and posterosuperior segments

Update Chirurgie