Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2011

01.01.2011 | Original Article

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy—quality of life 7 years after surgery

verfasst von: Matthias Kapischke, Florian Friedrich, Jürgen Hedderich, Tim Schulz, Amke Caliebe

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In spite of the widespread use of laparoscopic appendectomy, there is an ongoing debate on the advantages of this method when compared to open appendectomy. In the evaluation of a postoperative procedure, long-term quality of life is essential.

Patients and methods

From 1999 to 2001, 493 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were operated in a German general district hospital and included in an observational study. In a median postoperative interval of 7 years, these patients were re-evaluated regarding their quality of life after surgery. A Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire was applied to evaluate the general parameters of quality of life after surgery. This questionnaire was supplemented by an additional self-developed module referring to the appendectomy. The primary outcome was the recommendation of the experienced operating procedure to relatives and friends.

Results

A total of 243 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure: 132 patients were re-evaluated (recovery rate 54%). In the open group, 250 patients were operated: 121 patients were re-evaluated (recovery rate 48%). The median interval from operation to evaluation was 7 years in the laparoscopic group and 7.7 years in the open group. For the primary outcome, patients with laparoscopic appendectomy would significantly more often recommend the procedure than patients with the open operation method. For secondary outcomes, the cosmetic results were judged significantly more favourably in the laparoscopic group. The eight scaled scores of the SF-36 questionnaire did not differ significantly between the two groups. Four patients of the open group and nine patients of the laparoscopic group (including one converted procedure) needed a reoperation because of incisional hernia, adhesions and late infections.

Conclusion

Patients after laparoscopic appendectomy show a higher degree of satisfaction with their body and their scar than patients after open appendectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R (2006) Laparoscopic surgery—15 years after clinical introduction. World J Surg 30:1190–1203CrossRefPubMed Bittner R (2006) Laparoscopic surgery—15 years after clinical introduction. World J Surg 30:1190–1203CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouillon B, Kreder HJ, Eypasch E, Holbrook TL, Mayou R, Nast-Kolb D, Pirente N, Schelling G, Tiling T, Yates D (2002) Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries—basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 20:125–134PubMed Bouillon B, Kreder HJ, Eypasch E, Holbrook TL, Mayou R, Nast-Kolb D, Pirente N, Schelling G, Tiling T, Yates D (2002) Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries—basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 20:125–134PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897CrossRefPubMed Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546 Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements—September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, Eypasch E, Miserez M, Paul A (1995) The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements—September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 9:550–563PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Velanovich V (2004) Using quality-of-life measurements to predict patient satisfaction outcomes for antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 139:621–625, discussion 626CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V (2004) Using quality-of-life measurements to predict patient satisfaction outcomes for antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 139:621–625, discussion 626CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews RD, Anthony T, Kim LT, Wang J, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Reda DJ, Itani KM, Neumayer LA (2007) Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group. Am J Surg 194:611–617CrossRefPubMed Matthews RD, Anthony T, Kim LT, Wang J, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Reda DJ, Itani KM, Neumayer LA (2007) Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group. Am J Surg 194:611–617CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234:279–289, discussion 289-291CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234:279–289, discussion 289-291CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry Y, Courcoulas AP, Fernando HC, Buenaventura PO, McCaughan JS, Luketich JD (2004) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese patients. Jsls 8:19–23PubMed Perry Y, Courcoulas AP, Fernando HC, Buenaventura PO, McCaughan JS, Luketich JD (2004) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for recalcitrant gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbidly obese patients. Jsls 8:19–23PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448, discussion 448-450PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448, discussion 448-450PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan M, Salman B, Yilmaz TU, Oguz M (2009) A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 109:356–363PubMed Kaplan M, Salman B, Yilmaz TU, Oguz M (2009) A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 109:356–363PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapischke M, Tepel J, Bley K (2004) Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:517–523CrossRefPubMed Kapischke M, Tepel J, Bley K (2004) Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:517–523CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG, Padbury RT, Jeans PL, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis. Aust N Z J Surg 63:840–847CrossRefPubMed Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG, Padbury RT, Jeans PL, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis. Aust N Z J Surg 63:840–847CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, Thunedborg K (1998) The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1167–1170CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, Thunedborg K (1998) The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1167–1170CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M (1998) The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1159–1165CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M (1998) The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1159–1165CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendoza D, Newman RC, Albala D, Cohen MS, Tewari A, Lingeman J, Wong M, Kavoussi L, Adams J, Moore R, Winfield H, Glascock JM, Das S, Munch L, Grasso M, Dickinson M, Clayman R, Nakada S, McDougall EM, Wolf IS, Hulbert J, Leveillee RJ, Houshair A, Carson C (1996) Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review). Urology 48:562–567CrossRefPubMed Mendoza D, Newman RC, Albala D, Cohen MS, Tewari A, Lingeman J, Wong M, Kavoussi L, Adams J, Moore R, Winfield H, Glascock JM, Das S, Munch L, Grasso M, Dickinson M, Clayman R, Nakada S, McDougall EM, Wolf IS, Hulbert J, Leveillee RJ, Houshair A, Carson C (1996) Laparoscopic complications in markedly obese urologic patients (a multi-institutional review). Urology 48:562–567CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Uslu HY, Erkek AB, Cakmak A, Kepenekci I, Sozener U, Kocaay FA, Turkcapar AG, Kuterdem E (2007) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:600–603CrossRefPubMed Uslu HY, Erkek AB, Cakmak A, Kepenekci I, Sozener U, Kocaay FA, Turkcapar AG, Kuterdem E (2007) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:600–603CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, Schulz T, Hedderich J (2006) Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc 20:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337CrossRefPubMed Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317CrossRefPubMed Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Quercioli C, Messina G, Barbini E, Carriero G, Fani M, Nante N (2008) Importance of sociodemographic and morbidity aspects in measuring health-related quality of life: performances of three tools: comparison of three questionnaire scores. Eur J Health Econ 9:9 Quercioli C, Messina G, Barbini E, Carriero G, Fani M, Nante N (2008) Importance of sociodemographic and morbidity aspects in measuring health-related quality of life: performances of three tools: comparison of three questionnaire scores. Eur J Health Econ 9:9
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivares P, Tovar JA (1998) Laparoscopic surgery in children. An Esp Pediatr 48:620–624PubMed Olivares P, Tovar JA (1998) Laparoscopic surgery in children. An Esp Pediatr 48:620–624PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366CrossRefPubMed Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger M (1996) Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 35:XVII–XXVII, quiz XXVII–XXIX Bullinger M (1996) Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 35:XVII–XXVII, quiz XXVII–XXIX
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellert U, Bellach BM (1999) German National Health Survey 1998—description of an update random sampling test. Gesundheitswesen 61:184–190 Ellert U, Bellach BM (1999) German National Health Survey 1998—description of an update random sampling test. Gesundheitswesen 61:184–190
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachinski A, Vingerhoets A, Markuszewska-Proczko M, Stefaniak T (2004) Long-term quality-of-life assessment after laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1152–1153, author reply 1154–1155CrossRefPubMed Lachinski A, Vingerhoets A, Markuszewska-Proczko M, Stefaniak T (2004) Long-term quality-of-life assessment after laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1152–1153, author reply 1154–1155CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Nies C, Rothmund M (2002) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after reoperation for primary hyperparathyroidism: analysis of long-term results. World J Surg 26:1029–1036CrossRefPubMed Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Nies C, Rothmund M (2002) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after reoperation for primary hyperparathyroidism: analysis of long-term results. World J Surg 26:1029–1036CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokolovic E, Buchmann P, Schlomowitsch F, Szucs TD (2004) Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1663–1667PubMed Sokolovic E, Buchmann P, Schlomowitsch F, Szucs TD (2004) Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1663–1667PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen N, Reavis K, Hinojosa M, Smith BR, Stamos M (2009) A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended stapled appendectomy. Surg Innov 13:13 Nguyen N, Reavis K, Hinojosa M, Smith BR, Stamos M (2009) A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended stapled appendectomy. Surg Innov 13:13
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy—quality of life 7 years after surgery
verfasst von
Matthias Kapischke
Florian Friedrich
Jürgen Hedderich
Tim Schulz
Amke Caliebe
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0715-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.