nach oben

Erschienen in:

18.07.2016 | Original Paper

Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties

verfasst von: Riaz A. Agha, Mariana Devesa, Katharine Whitehurst, Alexander J. Fowler, Robert Coe, Georgina Wellstead, Dennis P. Orgill, Peter McCulloch

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Categorising research by level of evidence (LOE) is an important evidence-based medicine initiative. Our objective was to assess the change in LOEs in plastic surgery from 2003 to 2013 and compared this with five other surgical specialties.

Methods

A search for all research articles published in the top three general plastic surgery journals (ranked by impact factor) was conducted for 2003 and 2013. Articles were then labelled as LOE 1–5 and compared to other specialties.

Results

Mean LOE for plastic surgery improved by 4.1 % from 3.86 (95 % confidence interval 3.81–3.91) to 3.70 (95 % confidence interval 3.64–3.74) from 2003 to 2013 respectively. All six surgical specialties improved their mean LOE (range 3.7 to 10.9 %). By mean LOE, plastic surgery continues to rank five out of six.

Conclusions

Plastic surgery is tending towards higher levels of evidence at a slow pace. The specialty must continue to drive towards higher levels of evidence.

Level of Evidence: Not ratable.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

ASPS Evidence Rating Scales [online]. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/medical-professionals/health-policy/evidence-practice/ASPS-Rating-Scale-March-2011.pdf (accessed 10 November 2014)

Rohrich RJ, Eaves FF III (2011) So you want to be an evidence-based plastic surgeon? A lifelong journey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:467–472CrossRefPubMed

Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR (2008) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:207e–11eCrossRefPubMed

Thomson Reuters. J Citations Rep [online]. Available at: http://thomsonreuters.com/journal-citation-reports/ (accessed 10 November 2014)

Amin M, Mabe M (2000) Impact factors: use and abuse. Perspect Publ 1:1–6

Becker A, Blumle A, Momeni A (2013) Evidence-based plastic and reconstructive surgery: developments over two decades. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):657e–663eCrossRefPubMed

Post SF, Selles RW, McGrouther DA, Ritt MJPF, Hovius SER, Fridén J, Walbeehm ET (2014) Levels of evidence and quality of randomized controlled trials in hand and wrist surgery: an analysis of two major hand surgery journals. J Hand Surg Eur 39:900–902CrossRef

Chuback JE, Varley TL, Yarascavitch BA, Eaves F, Thoma A, Bhandari M (2013) The level of evidence presented at plastic surgery meetings: what do we have to learn? Plast Reconstr Surg 131:776–783CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Kolias AG (2014) Trainee-led research collaboratives: a novel model for delivering multi-centre studies. ANZ J Surg 84(12):902–3CrossRefPubMed

11.

Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network [online]. Available at: www.reconstructivesurgerytrialsnetwork.com (accessed 4 December 2014)

12.

Academic Surgical Collaborative [online]. Available at: www.surgicalcollaborative.com (accessed 4 December 2014)

13.

Agha RA, Camm CF, Edison E, Orgill DP (2013) The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:447–452CrossRefPubMed

14.

Agha RA, Camm CF, Doganay E, Edison E, Siddiqui MRS, Orgill DP (2013) Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plast Surg 37:55–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Agha R, Lee S, Jeong KJL, Fowler A and Orgill DP (2015) Reporting Quality of Observational studies in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg (article in press)

16.

Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Herlin C, Goodacre T, Orgill DP (2015) Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction post-mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(2):143–61CrossRefPubMed

17.

Balliol College. Reporting guidelines for case series [online]. Available at: http://www.balliol.ox.ac.uk/bii/reporting-guideliness-for-case-series (accessed 4 December 2014)

18.

Equator Network. Preferred reporting of case series [online]. Available at: http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/#23 (accessed 4 December 2014)

19.

Time for a new approach to case reports. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2010;1(1):1–3

20.

Agha RA, Goodacre T, Orgill DP (2013) Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction post-mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 3(10), e003709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Agha RA, Gundogan B, Fowler AJ, Bragg TWH, Orgill DP (2014) The efficacy of the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler in the detection of free flap compromise: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 4, e004253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Sullivan D, Chung K, Eaves FF Rohrich RJ (2011) The level of evidence pyramid indicating levels of evidence in plastic and reconstructive surgery articles. Plast Reconstr Surg ;311–314

23.

Agha R, Cooper D, Muir G (2007) The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review. Int J Surg 5(6):413–422CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, McCulloch P (2013) How can we improve surgical research and innovation? The IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg 11(10):1038–1042CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties
verfasst von: Riaz A. Agha
Mariana Devesa
Katharine Whitehurst
Alexander J. Fowler
Robert Coe
Georgina Wellstead
Dennis P. Orgill
Peter McCulloch
Publikationsdatum: 18.07.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1219-1

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Novel microvascular anastomosis between a single vessel and two downstream vessels

Interest in cosmetic surgery among Iranian women: the role of self-esteem, narcissism, and self-perceived attractiveness

Combined anterolateral chest and medial arm flap for treatment of degloving injuries of four digits

The fully rotated tensor fasciae latae perforator propeller flap in reconstruction of trochanteric pressure sores

Unsuccessful vascularized fibular periosteal graft for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis

Post-traumatic onset of secondary progression of gynecomastia

Update Chirurgie