nach oben

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Erschienen in:

20.01.2021 | HIP

Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yuichi Kuroda, Shingo Hashimoto, Masayoshi Saito, Shinya Hayashi, Naoki Nakano, Takehiko Matsushita, Takahiro Niikura, Ryosuke Kuroda, Tomoyuki Matsumoto

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature comparing the postoperative outcomes after following hip arthroscopy in obese and non-obese patients.

Methods

Studies comparing the outcomes following hip arthroscopy of obese and non-obese patients were systematically identified via a computer-assisted literature search of Pubmed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing the outcome of hip arthroscopy in different body mass index (BMI) groups were included. Data including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), revision arthroscopy rate, conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and complications were collected. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the quality of each study quality. The effect of heterogeneity was quantified by calculating the I² value.

Results

A total of eight studies were finally included in the qualitative analysis, and three studies of high quality involving 373 hips were included in the quantitative assessment. All the studies defined obesity as a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m². The modified Harris Hip Score and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score were 5.1 (95% CI 1.1–9.1) and 9.0 (95% CI 5.0–13.1) points lower, respectively, in the obese group than in the non-obese group. The pooled odds ratios were 1.2 (95% CI 0.5–2.7) for revision arthroscopy, 2.4 (95% CI 1.3–4.6) for conversion to THA, and 3.2 (95% CI 1.2–8.6 for complications in favor of the non-obese group. The heterogeneity was low in all outcome assessments (I² 0–18%).

Conclusion

Obese patients had significantly lower PROMs than non-obese patients following hip arthroscopic surgery, and the THA conversion and complication rates were 2.4 times and 3.2 times higher, respectively. Understanding the effect of obesity on hip arthroscopy will allow appropriate surgical indications for surgery to be further refined and help obese patients to understand their individual risk profile.

Level of evidence

Systematic review of Level III–IV studies, Level IV.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bartlett JD, Lawrence JE, Yan M, Guevel B, Stewart ME, Audenaert E et al (2020) The learning curves of a validated virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:761–767CrossRef

Bech N, Kodde I, Dusseldorp F, Druyts P, Jansen S, Haverkamp D (2015) Hip arthroscopy in obese, a successful combination? J Hip Preserv Surg 3:37–42CrossRef

Chahal J, Thiel GSV, Mather RC, Lee S, Salata MJ, Nho SJ (2014) The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Orthop J Sports Med 2:2325967114S2325900105CrossRef

Chahal J, Van Thiel GS, Mather RC III, Lee S, Song SH, Davis AM et al (2015) The patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 43:1844–1849CrossRef

Clohisy JC, Baca G, Beaulé PE, Kim Y-J, Larson CM, Millis MB et al (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:1348–1356CrossRef

Collins JA, Beutel BG, Garofolo G, Youm T (2015) Correlation of obesity with patient-reported outcomes and complications after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 31:57–62CrossRef

Dodwell ER, Latorre JG, Parisini E, Zwettler E, Chandra D, Mulpuri K et al (2010) NSAID exposure and risk of nonunion: a meta-analysis of case–control and cohort studies. Calcif Tissue Int 87:193–202CrossRef

Domb BG, Martin TJ, Gui C, Chandrasekaran S, Suarez-Ahedo C, Lodhia P (2018) Predictors of clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy: a prospective analysis of 1038 patients with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 46:1324–1330CrossRef

Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, Achana F, Donovan JL, Griffin J et al (2018) Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391:2225–2235CrossRef

10.

Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, Lindner D, Stake CE, Domb BG (2015a) Does obesity affect outcomes after hip arthroscopy?: a cohort analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:16–23CrossRef

11.

Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, Stake CE, Domb BG (2015b) Does obesity affect outcomes in hip arthroscopy? A matched-pair controlled study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:965–971CrossRef

12.

Hevesi M, Krych AJ, Johnson NR, Redmond JM, Hartigan DE, Levy BA et al (2018) Multicenter analysis of midterm clinical outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 46:280–287CrossRef

13.

Iidaka T, Muraki S, Oka H, Horii C, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K et al (2020) Incidence rate and risk factors for radiographic hip osteoarthritis in Japanese men and women: a 10-year follow-up of the ROAD study. Osteoarthr Cartil 28:182–188CrossRef

14.

Jiang L, Rong J, Wang Y, Hu F, Bao C, Li X et al (2011) The relationship between body mass index and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine 78:150–155CrossRef

15.

Kanda Y (2012) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software’EZR’for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRef

16.

Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM (2013) Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:2065–2073CrossRef

17.

Kester BS, Capogna B, Mahure SA, Ryan MK, Mollon B, Youm T (2018) Independent risk factors for revision surgery or conversion to total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy: a review of a large statewide database from 2011 to 2012. Arthroscopy 34:464–470CrossRef

18.

Larson CM, Giveans MR, Taylor M (2011) Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve function with radiographic arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1667–1676CrossRef

19.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151:W65–W94CrossRef

20.

Minkara AA, Westermann RW, Rosneck J, Lynch TS (2019) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after hip arthroscopy in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 47:488–500CrossRef

21.

Mygind-Klavsen B, Nielsen TG, Lund B, Lind M (2020) Clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are inferior compared to primary procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Athrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06135-w

22.

Nho SJ, Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Cvetanovich GL, Neal WH, Harris JD et al (2019) Survivorship and outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome performed with modern surgical techniques. Am J Sports Med 47:1662–1669CrossRef

23.

Nicolay RW, Selley RS, Terry MA, Tjong VK (2019) Body mass index as a risk factor for 30-day postoperative complications in knee, hip, and shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 35(874–882):e873

24.

Obremskey WT, Pappas N, Attallah-Wasif E, Tornetta P III, Bhandari M (2005) Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2632–2638CrossRef

25.

Palmer AJ, Malak TT, Broomfield J, Holton J, Majkowski L, Thomas GE et al (2016) Past and projected temporal trends in arthroscopic hip surgery in England between 2002 and 2013. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2:e000082CrossRef

26.

Palmer AJR, Ayyar Gupta V, Fernquest S, Rombach I, Dutton SJ, Mansour R et al (2019) Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with physiotherapy and activity modification for the treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 364:l185CrossRef

27.

Parratte S, Pesenti S, Argenson J-N (2014) Obesity in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:S91–S97CrossRef

28.

Perets I, Rybalko D, Chaharbakhshi EO, Mu BH, Chen AW, Domb BG (2018) Minimum five-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears in patients with obesity: a match-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:965–973CrossRef

29.

Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Carlisle JC, Patterson DC (2013) Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2492–2496CrossRef

30.

Saltzman BM, Kuhns BD, Basques B, Leroux T, Alter J, Mather RC III et al (2017) The influence of body mass index on outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery with capsular plication for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 45:2303–2311CrossRef

31.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716CrossRef

32.

Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Petersen J, Welch V, Losos M, et al (2011) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. University of Ottawa, Canada.http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

33.

West CR, Bedard NA, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Callaghan JJ (2019) Rates and risk factors for revision hip arthroscopy. Iowa Orthop J 39:95PubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Youm T, Wolfson T, Ryan MK, Looze CA, Capogna B, Begly JP, Youm T et al (2019) Outcome trends after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: when do patients improve? J Hip Preserv Surg Arthrosc 3(Supp 1):3261–3270

Titel: Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Yuichi Kuroda
Shingo Hashimoto
Masayoshi Saito
Shinya Hayashi
Naoki Nakano
Takehiko Matsushita
Takahiro Niikura
Ryosuke Kuroda
Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Publikationsdatum: 20.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06435-9

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis