Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 1/2009

01.02.2009 | ALARA CONCEPT IN PEDIATRIC IMAGING: ONCOLOGY

Radiation biology for pediatric radiologists

verfasst von: Eric J. Hall

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Sonderheft 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The biological effects of radiation result primarily from damage to DNA. There are three effects of concern to the radiologist that determine the need for radiation protection and the dose principle of ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable). (1) Heritable effects. These were thought to be most important in the 1950s, but concern has declined in recent years. The current ICRP risk estimate is very small at 0.2%/Sv. (2) Effects on the developing embryo and fetus include weight retardation, congenital anomalies, microcephaly and mental retardation. During the sensitive period of 8 to 15 weeks of gestation, the risk estimate for mental retardation is very high at 40%/Sv, but because it is a deterministic effect, there is likely to be a threshold of about 200 mSv. (3) Carcinogenesis is considered to be the most important consequence of low doses of radiation, with a risk of fatal cancer of about 5%/Sv, and is therefore of most concern in radiology. Our knowledge of radiation carcinogenesis comes principally from the 60-year study of the A-bomb survivors. The use of radiation for diagnostic purposes has increased dramatically in recent years. The annual collective population dose has increased by 750% since 1980 to 930,000 person Sv. One of the principal reasons is the burgeoning use of CT scans. In 2006, more than 60 million CT scans were performed in the U.S., with about 6 million of them in children. As a rule of thumb, an abdominal CT scan in a 1-year-old child results in a life-time mortality risk of about one in a thousand. While the risk to the individual is small and acceptable when the scan is clinically justified, even a small risk when multiplied by an increasingly large number is likely to produce a significant public health concern. It is for this reason that every effort should be made to reduce the doses associated with procedures such as CT scans, particularly in children, in the spirit of ALARA.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell LB, Russell WL (1954) An analysis of the changing radiation response of the developing mouse embryo. J Cell Physiol 43(Suppl 1):130–149 Russell LB, Russell WL (1954) An analysis of the changing radiation response of the developing mouse embryo. J Cell Physiol 43(Suppl 1):130–149
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Otake M, Schull WJ (1984) In utero exposure to A-bomb radiation and mental retardation: a reassessment. Br J Radiol 57:409–414PubMedCrossRef Otake M, Schull WJ (1984) In utero exposure to A-bomb radiation and mental retardation: a reassessment. Br J Radiol 57:409–414PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRef Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat ICRP (1990) ICRP recommendations. Annals of the ICRP publication 60. Pergamon, Oxford, England ICRP (1990) ICRP recommendations. Annals of the ICRP publication 60. Pergamon, Oxford, England
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. PNAS 100:13761–13766PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. PNAS 100:13761–13766PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) CT: an increasing source of radiation exposure. New Engl J Med 357:2277PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) CT: an increasing source of radiation exposure. New Engl J Med 357:2277PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Radiation biology for pediatric radiologists
verfasst von
Eric J. Hall
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1027-2

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2009

Pediatric Radiology 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

ALARA CONCEPT IN PEDIATRIC IMAGING: ONCOLOGY

Imaging of abdominal tumours: CT or MRI?

ALARA CONCEPT IN PEDIATRIC IMAGING: ONCOLOGY

Welcome

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.