Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2021

27.07.2020 | Original Article

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for primary staging in 160 high-risk prostate cancer patients; metastasis detection rate, influence on clinical management and preliminary results of treatment efficacy

verfasst von: M. Wondergem, F. M. van der Zant, W. A. M. Broos, T. A. Roeleveld, R. Donker, D. ten Oever, R. W. F. Geenen, R. J. J. Knol

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT shows better diagnostic performance for detection of lymph node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging. Studies of PSMA PET/CT in primary staging comprise highly selected patient cohorts. This study evaluates 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT as first-line imaging modality for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer.

Material

From February 2018 until April 2019, all patients with high-risk prostate cancer received 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for staging of prostate cancer. Baseline characteristics, findings at 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT, number and type of required additional diagnostic procedures, findings at additional diagnostic procedures, and effects of therapy on PSA levels for all patients treated with curative intent were collected and evaluated.

Results

One hundred-sixty patients were included in the study of which 90 (56%) had evidence of metastasized disease (N1, M1a, M1b and, M1c in 49%, 28%, 31%, and 3% respectively). Additional diagnostic imaging was needed in 2/160 patients (1%) because of equivocal findings on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Eighty-one patients had evidence of PSMA-positive lymph node metastases, of whom 39 (48%) had no enlarged lymph nodes on CT; 18F-DCFPyL PET detected additional metastatic lymph nodes in 41/42 patients that had evidence of lymph node metastases on CT. 18F-DCFPyL PET altered patients’ management in 17% of patients.

Conclusion

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT can be used as first-line imaging modality for therapy selection in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer, without need for further diagnostic imaging procedures in the majority of patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RC, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2017. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RC, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2017.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, De Santis M, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Wiegel T, Mottet N. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2017. Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, De Santis M, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Wiegel T, Mottet N. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2017.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019. Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, van der Sluis TM, Knol RJJ, van Kalmthout LWM, et al. Early lesion detection with (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04385-6. Wondergem M, Jansen BHE, van der Zant FM, van der Sluis TM, Knol RJJ, van Kalmthout LWM, et al. Early lesion detection with (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-019-04385-6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, Thierfelder KM, Bartenstein P, Faber C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016. Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, Thierfelder KM, Bartenstein P, Faber C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025. Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2015.​12.​025.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Leeuwen PJ, Emmett L, Ho B, Delprado W, Ting F, Nguyen Q, et al. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13540. van Leeuwen PJ, Emmett L, Ho B, Delprado W, Ting F, Nguyen Q, et al. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​13540.
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zacho HD, Nielsen JB, Haberkorn U, Stenholt L, Petersen LJ. (68) Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer: a systematic review of the published literature. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12480. Zacho HD, Nielsen JB, Haberkorn U, Stenholt L, Petersen LJ. (68) Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer: a systematic review of the published literature. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​cpf.​12480.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe SP, Li X, Trock BJ, Werner RA, Frey SM, DiGianvittorio M, et al. Prospective comparison of PET imaging with PSMA-targeted (18)F-DCFPyL versus Na(18)F for bone lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.227793. Rowe SP, Li X, Trock BJ, Werner RA, Frey SM, DiGianvittorio M, et al. Prospective comparison of PET imaging with PSMA-targeted (18)F-DCFPyL versus Na(18)F for bone lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2967/​jnumed.​119.​227793.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dyrberg E, Hendel HW, Huynh THV, Klausen TW, Logager VB, Madsen C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with (18)F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5682-x. Dyrberg E, Hendel HW, Huynh THV, Klausen TW, Logager VB, Madsen C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with (18)F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Radiol. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-018-5682-x.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Uprimny C, Svirydenka A, Fritz J, Kroiss AS, Nilica B, Decristoforo C, et al. Comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [(18)F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4048-6. Uprimny C, Svirydenka A, Fritz J, Kroiss AS, Nilica B, Decristoforo C, et al. Comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [(18)F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-018-4048-6.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu W, Zukotynski K, Emmett L, Chung HT, Chung P, Wolfson R, et al. A prospective study of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT restaging in recurrent prostate cancer following primary external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. Liu W, Zukotynski K, Emmett L, Chung HT, Chung P, Wolfson R, et al. A prospective study of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT restaging in recurrent prostate cancer following primary external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019.
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Narang AK, Trieu J, Radwan N, Ram A, Robertson SP, He P, et al. End-of-radiation PSA as a novel prognostic factor in patients undergoing definitive radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.67. Narang AK, Trieu J, Radwan N, Ram A, Robertson SP, He P, et al. End-of-radiation PSA as a novel prognostic factor in patients undergoing definitive radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​pcan.​2016.​67.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamb DS, Denham JW, Joseph D, Matthews J, Atkinson C, Spry NA, et al. A comparison of the prognostic value of early PSA test-based variables following external beam radiotherapy, with or without preceding androgen deprivation: analysis of data from the TROG 96.01 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.071. Lamb DS, Denham JW, Joseph D, Matthews J, Atkinson C, Spry NA, et al. A comparison of the prognostic value of early PSA test-based variables following external beam radiotherapy, with or without preceding androgen deprivation: analysis of data from the TROG 96.01 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2009.​10.​071.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cury FL, Hunt D, Roach M 3rd, Shipley W, Gore E, Hsu IC, et al. Prostate-specific antigen response after short-term hormone therapy plus external-beam radiotherapy and outcome in patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 9413. Cancer. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28019. Cury FL, Hunt D, Roach M 3rd, Shipley W, Gore E, Hsu IC, et al. Prostate-specific antigen response after short-term hormone therapy plus external-beam radiotherapy and outcome in patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 9413. Cancer. 2013. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​28019.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Hahn NM, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3657. Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Hahn NM, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2017.​75.​3657.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Broughman JR, Chen RC. Management of node-positive and oligometastatic prostate cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017. Broughman JR, Chen RC. Management of node-positive and oligometastatic prostate cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleinclauss F, Thiery-Vuillemin A. Oligometastatic prostate cancer management. Prog Urol. 2019. Kleinclauss F, Thiery-Vuillemin A. Oligometastatic prostate cancer management. Prog Urol. 2019.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong WL, Koh TL, Lim Joon D, Chao M, Farrugia B, Lau E, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a single-institution experience and review of the published literature. BJU Int. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14886. Ong WL, Koh TL, Lim Joon D, Chao M, Farrugia B, Lau E, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a single-institution experience and review of the published literature. BJU Int. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​14886.
Metadaten
Titel
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for primary staging in 160 high-risk prostate cancer patients; metastasis detection rate, influence on clinical management and preliminary results of treatment efficacy
verfasst von
M. Wondergem
F. M. van der Zant
W. A. M. Broos
T. A. Roeleveld
R. Donker
D. ten Oever
R. W. F. Geenen
R. J. J. Knol
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04782-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe