Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2009

01.06.2009

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Factors After Surgical Resection

verfasst von: Alfredo Guglielmi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Tommaso Campagnaro, Silvia Pachera, Alessandro Valdegamberi, Paola Nicoli, Alessandro Cappellani, Giulio Malfermoni, Calogero Iacono

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver tumor. The resectability rate is low because at the time of diagnosis this disease is frequently beyond the limits of surgical therapy. Curative resection (R0) is the most effective treatment and the only therapy associated with prolonged disease-free survival. Based on the gross appearance of the tumor the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) defined three types: mass-forming type (MF), periductal infiltrating type (PI), intraductal growth (IG) type. The prognostic significance of gross type has been demonstrated in Eastern countries, but this issue has not been clarified in Western countries. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors for survival in a group of patients submitted to surgical resection for ICC.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2007 a total of 81 consecutive patients with ICC were submitted to surgery. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, extensive vascular involvement, or multiple intrahepatic metastases were excluded from surgical resection. Tumors were classified according to TMN stage (6th edition, 2002) and LCSGJ gross type classification. Tumor gross appearance on the cut surface was categorized into the following types according to the classification proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan: MF, PI, or IG type.

Results

During the study period 52 patients were submitted to surgical resection with curative intent, whereas in 29 patients surgery was limited to explorative laparotomy. Curative resection (R0) was achieved in 43 patients (83%); and a major hepatic resection was performed in 63% (33/52) of the patients. Extrahepatic bile duct resection was carried out in 36% (19/52) of cases. According to the LCSGJ classification, the MF type was present in 34 patients (65%), the MF + PI type in 13 (25%), the PI type in 3 (6%), and the IG type in 2 (4%). Overall median survival time was 40 months, with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates of 83%, 50%, 20%, respectively. Survival was significantly related to the macroscopic gross type, with a median survival of 50 months for patients with the MF type, 19 months for the MF + PI type, 15 months for the PI type, and 17 months for the IG type. At univariate analysis, the macroscopic gross appearance of the tumor, the presence of lymph node metastasis, involvement of extrahepatic bile ducts, the presence of macroscopic vascular invasion, and positive resection margins were significant related to survival. At multivariate analysis, macroscopic vascular invasion and lymph nodes metastases were significant related to survival with hazard ratios of 4.11 and 2.79, respectively. Further statistical analyses were carried out to identify the relation between macroscopic gross type and prognosis. We identified that the MF + PI type tumors were significantly associated with negative prognostic factors, such as the involvement of extrahepatic bile ducts, the presence of lymph nodes metastases, the presence of macroscopic vascular invasion, the presence of perineural invasion, and higher T stage.

Conclusions

Curative resection of ICC is the only therapy that can achieve long-term survival. The best results were observed in patients who underwent R0 resection for MF tumors without lymph node metastases or vascular invasion. Important predictive factors related to poor survival are MF + PI macroscopic tumor type, lymph node metastases, and vascular invasion. In these patients, other therapeutic approaches (i.e., adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy) should be evaluated to improve results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison LE, Fong Y, Klimstra DS et al (1998) Surgical treatment of 32 patients with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 85:1068–1070PubMedCrossRef Harrison LE, Fong Y, Klimstra DS et al (1998) Surgical treatment of 32 patients with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 85:1068–1070PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T et al (1998) Does gross appearance indicate prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Surg Oncol 69:162–167PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T et al (1998) Does gross appearance indicate prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Surg Oncol 69:162–167PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S et al (1998) Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg 227:70–79PubMedCrossRef Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S et al (1998) Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg 227:70–79PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Ando T et al (1995) Clinicopathologic spectrum of resected extraductal mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 76:2449–2456PubMedCrossRef Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Ando T et al (1995) Clinicopathologic spectrum of resected extraductal mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 76:2449–2456PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieser MJ, Barry MK, Rowland C et al (1998) Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a 31-year experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:41–47PubMedCrossRef Lieser MJ, Barry MK, Rowland C et al (1998) Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a 31-year experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 5:41–47PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR et al (2005) Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg 241:134–143PubMed Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR et al (2005) Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg 241:134–143PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherqui D, Tantawi B, Alon R et al (1995) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results of aggressive surgical management. Arch Surg 130:1073–1078PubMed Cherqui D, Tantawi B, Alon R et al (1995) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results of aggressive surgical management. Arch Surg 130:1073–1078PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Seyama Y, Makuuchi M (2007) Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13:1505–1515PubMed Seyama Y, Makuuchi M (2007) Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13:1505–1515PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2003) General rules for clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 2nd English edition. Kanehara, Tokyo Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2003) General rules for clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 2nd English edition. Kanehara, Tokyo
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nozaki Y, Yamamoto M, Ikai I et al (1998) Reconsideration of the lymph node metastasis pattern (N factor) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for primary liver carcinoma. Cancer 83:1923–1929PubMedCrossRef Nozaki Y, Yamamoto M, Ikai I et al (1998) Reconsideration of the lymph node metastasis pattern (N factor) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for primary liver carcinoma. Cancer 83:1923–1929PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H et al (1999) Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6:108–116PubMedCrossRef Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H et al (1999) Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6:108–116PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T et al (2003) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10:432–440PubMedCrossRef Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T et al (2003) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 10:432–440PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F et al (2002) Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg 89:1525–1531PubMedCrossRef Ohtsuka M, Ito H, Kimura F et al (2002) Results of surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and clinicopathological factors influencing survival. Br J Surg 89:1525–1531PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339 Anonymous (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawarada Y, Yamagiwa K, Das BC (2002) Analysis of the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and survival time in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 183:679–685PubMedCrossRef Kawarada Y, Yamagiwa K, Das BC (2002) Analysis of the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and survival time in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 183:679–685PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, Yokoi Y et al (2002) Clinicopathological prognostic factors and impact of surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 26:687–693PubMedCrossRef Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, Yokoi Y et al (2002) Clinicopathological prognostic factors and impact of surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 26:687–693PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762PubMedCrossRef DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Okabayashi T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T et al (2001) A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer 92:2374–2383PubMedCrossRef Okabayashi T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T et al (2001) A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer 92:2374–2383PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Uenishi T, Yamazaki O, Yamamoto T et al (2005) Serosal invasion in TNM staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:479–483PubMedCrossRef Uenishi T, Yamazaki O, Yamamoto T et al (2005) Serosal invasion in TNM staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:479–483PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang H, Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC et al (2006) Surgical therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Chirurg 77:53–60PubMedCrossRef Lang H, Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC et al (2006) Surgical therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Chirurg 77:53–60PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H et al (2001) Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 181:507–511PubMedCrossRef Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H et al (2001) Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 181:507–511PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagakawa T, Kayahara M, Ikeda S et al (2002) Biliary tract cancer treatment: results from the Biliary Tract Cancer Statistics Registry in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:569–575PubMedCrossRef Nagakawa T, Kayahara M, Ikeda S et al (2002) Biliary tract cancer treatment: results from the Biliary Tract Cancer Statistics Registry in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:569–575PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikai I, Arii S, Ichida T et al (2005) Report of the 16th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer. Hepatol Res 32:163–172PubMedCrossRef Ikai I, Arii S, Ichida T et al (2005) Report of the 16th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer. Hepatol Res 32:163–172PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Miwa S, Miyagawa S, Kobayashi A et al (2006) Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery. J Gastroenterol 4:893–900CrossRef Miwa S, Miyagawa S, Kobayashi A et al (2006) Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery. J Gastroenterol 4:893–900CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N et al (2005) Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 29:728–733PubMedCrossRef Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N et al (2005) Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 29:728–733PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T (1999) Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:147–150PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T (1999) Lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29:147–150PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuji T, Hiraoka T, Kanemitsu K et al (2001) Lymphatic spreading pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 129:401–407PubMed Tsuji T, Hiraoka T, Kanemitsu K et al (2001) Lymphatic spreading pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 129:401–407PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirohashi K, Uenishi T, Kubo S et al (2002) Histologic bile duct invasion by a mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:233–236PubMedCrossRef Hirohashi K, Uenishi T, Kubo S et al (2002) Histologic bile duct invasion by a mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:233–236PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y et al (2007) Surgical outcomes of the mass-forming plus periductal infiltrating types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study with the typical mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 31:2016–2022PubMedCrossRef Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y et al (2007) Surgical outcomes of the mass-forming plus periductal infiltrating types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study with the typical mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 31:2016–2022PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic Factors After Surgical Resection
verfasst von
Alfredo Guglielmi
Andrea Ruzzenente
Tommaso Campagnaro
Silvia Pachera
Alessandro Valdegamberi
Paola Nicoli
Alessandro Cappellani
Giulio Malfermoni
Calogero Iacono
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-9970-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

World Journal of Surgery 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.