Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2004

01.05.2004 | Health Economy

Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature

verfasst von: Jonathan D. Dodd, Peter M. MacEneaney, Dermot E. Malone

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to show how evidence-based medicine (EBM) techniques can be applied to the appraisal of diagnostic radiology publications. A clinical scenario is described: a gastroenterologist has questioned the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in a patient who may have common bile duct (CBD) stones. His opinion was based on an article on MRCP published in “Gut.” The principles of EBM are described and then applied to the critical appraisal of this paper. Another paper on the same subject was obtained from the radiology literature and was also critically appraised using explicit EBM criteria. The principles for assessing the validity and strength of both studies are outlined. All statistical parameters were generated quickly using a spreadsheet in Excel format. The results of EBM assessment of both papers are presented. The calculation and application of confidence intervals (CIs) and likelihood ratios (LRs) for both studies are described. These statistical results are applied to individual patient scenarios using graphs of conditional probability (GCP). Basic EBM principles are described and additional points relevant to radiologists discussed. Online resources for EBR practice are identified. The principles of EBM and their application to radiology are discussed. It is emphasized that sensitivity and specificity are point estimates of the “true” characteristics of a test in clinical practice. A spreadsheet can be used to quickly calculate CIs, LRs and GCPs. These give the radiologist a better understanding of the meaning of diagnostic test results in any patient or population of patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O et al. (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122PubMed Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O et al. (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS et al. (2000) Evidence-based medicine, how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS et al. (2000) Evidence-based medicine, how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M et al. (1997) Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 205:523–530PubMed Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M et al. (1997) Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 205:523–530PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Black WC (1990) How to evaluate the radiology literature. Am J Roentgenol 154:17–22 Black WC (1990) How to evaluate the radiology literature. Am J Roentgenol 154:17–22
5.
Zurück zum Zitat The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group (2001) Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 220:566–575PubMed The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group (2001) Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 220:566–575PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 270:2598–2601CrossRef Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 270:2598–2601CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al. (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 312:71–72 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al. (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 312:71–72
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 271:389–391CrossRef Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 271:389–391CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2000) The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis. Clin Radiol 55:227–235CrossRefPubMed MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2000) The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis. Clin Radiol 55:227–235CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 271:703–707CrossRef Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. J Am Med Assoc 271:703–707CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat The Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom. J Eur Commun L 180:22–36 The Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom. J Eur Commun L 180:22–36
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagan TJ (1975) Letter: nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257PubMed Fagan TJ (1975) Letter: nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 293:257PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang PJ (1988) Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist’s survival guide. Am J Roentgenol 152:721–727 Chang PJ (1988) Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist’s survival guide. Am J Roentgenol 152:721–727
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 292:746–750 Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 292:746–750
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ (1995) Applying the findings of clinical trials to individual patients. ACP J Club 122:A12–A13 Guyatt GH, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ (1995) Applying the findings of clinical trials to individual patients. ACP J Club 122:A12–A13
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Heddle N et al. (1995) Basic statistics for clinicians. 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. CMAJ 152:169–173PubMed Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Heddle N et al. (1995) Basic statistics for clinicians. 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals. CMAJ 152:169–173PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lusted LB (1975) Editorial: in the process of solution. N Engl J Med 293:255–256PubMed Lusted LB (1975) Editorial: in the process of solution. N Engl J Med 293:255–256PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J (1986) The likelihood ratio: an improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110:689–693PubMed Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J (1986) The likelihood ratio: an improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110:689–693PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O et al. (1998) Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 133:162–166CrossRefPubMed Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O et al. (1998) Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 133:162–166CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). Health Information Research Unit: evidence-based health informatics. http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/ McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). Health Information Research Unit: evidence-based health informatics. http://​hiru.​mcmaster.​ca/​
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94PubMed Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518PubMed Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunink MG, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614PubMed Hunink MG, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat User’s guides to evidence-based practice. www.cche.net/usersguides/main.asp User’s guides to evidence-based practice. www.cche.net/usersguides/main.asp
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) (2002) User’s guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based practice. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, American Medical Assocation Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) (2002) User’s guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based practice. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, American Medical Assocation
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone DE, Staunton M, Skehan SJ et al. (2003) Evidence-based radiology on the internet: a website for education and practice. Eur Radiol 13 (Suppl 1):435 Malone DE, Staunton M, Skehan SJ et al. (2003) Evidence-based radiology on the internet: a website for education and practice. Eur Radiol 13 (Suppl 1):435
Metadaten
Titel
Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature
verfasst von
Jonathan D. Dodd
Peter M. MacEneaney
Dermot E. Malone
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2004
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2145-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2004

European Radiology 5/2004 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.