Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2011

01.08.2011 | Original Article

Palonosetron plus 3-day aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy

verfasst von: Flavia Longo, Giovanni Mansueto, Vittoria Lapadula, Rita De Sanctis, Silvia Quadrini, Roberta Grande, Bruno Gori, Amelia Altavilla, I. D’Antoni, Ester Del Signore, Luciano Stumbo, Cristina De Luca, Barbara Cimadon, Enrico Cortesi, Teresa Gamucci, Marisa Di Seri

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 8/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The combination of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is currently the standard antiemetic treatment in patients receiving cisplatin-based high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of palonosetron, a unique second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, aprepitant, the only approved neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving HEC (cisplatin ≥50 mg/mq).

Methods

Chemotherapy-naïve adult patients, receiving cisplatin-based HEC, were treated with palonosetron 0.25 mg/i.v., dexamethasone 20 mg/i.v., and aprepitant 125 mg/p.o., 1-h before chemotherapy. Aprepitant 80 mg/p.o. and dexamethasone 4 mg p.o. were administered on days 2–3. Primary end point was complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication), during the overall study period (0–120 h). Secondary end points were complete control (CR and no more than mild nausea), emesis-free rate, and nausea-free rate during the acute (0–24 h), delayed (24–120 h), and overall (0-120 h) periods. Safety was also evaluated.

Results

A total of 222 patients were included in the study. Median age was 62 years, 76.6% were male and 23.4% female, and most common tumors were lung (66.7%) and head and neck (15.8%); 70.3% of patients achieved CR during the overall study period. Complete control, emesis-free rate, and nausea-free rate were 70.3%, 92.8%, and 59.9%, respectively, during the overall phase. The most commonly reported side effects were constipation (39% of patients) and headache (5%).

Conclusions

This study shows that palonosetron in combination with aprepitant and dexamethasone is effective to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients treated with cisplatin-based HEC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesketh PJ (1999) Defining the emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy regimens: relevance to clinical practice. Oncologist 4:191–196PubMed Hesketh PJ (1999) Defining the emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy regimens: relevance to clinical practice. Oncologist 4:191–196PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J et al (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia international antiemetic consensus conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28PubMedCrossRef Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J et al (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia international antiemetic consensus conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrstedt J (2008) Antiemetics: an update and the MASCC guidelines applied in clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5(1):32–43PubMedCrossRef Herrstedt J (2008) Antiemetics: an update and the MASCC guidelines applied in clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 5(1):32–43PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR et al (2006) American society of clinical oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24:2932–2947PubMedCrossRef Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR et al (2006) American society of clinical oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24:2932–2947PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kris MG (2005) Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 13:85–96PubMedCrossRef Kris MG (2005) Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 13:85–96PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Forni C, Ferrari S, Loro L et al (2000) Granisetron, tropisetron, and ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by a combination of cisplatin-adriamycin and by high-dose ifosfamide delivered in multi-day continuous infusions. Support Care Cancer 8:131–133PubMedCrossRef Forni C, Ferrari S, Loro L et al (2000) Granisetron, tropisetron, and ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by a combination of cisplatin-adriamycin and by high-dose ifosfamide delivered in multi-day continuous infusions. Support Care Cancer 8:131–133PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Geling O, Eichler H-G (2005) Should 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications. J Clin Oncol 23:1289–1294PubMedCrossRef Geling O, Eichler H-G (2005) Should 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications. J Clin Oncol 23:1289–1294PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg P, Figuero-Vadillo J, Zamora R et al (2003) Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5HT3 receptor antagonist. Results of a phase III, single dose trial versus dolasetron. Cancer 98(11):2473–2482PubMedCrossRef Eisenberg P, Figuero-Vadillo J, Zamora R et al (2003) Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5HT3 receptor antagonist. Results of a phase III, single dose trial versus dolasetron. Cancer 98(11):2473–2482PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gralla R, Lichinitser M, Van Der Vegt S et al (2003) Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron. Ann Oncol 14:1570–1577PubMedCrossRef Gralla R, Lichinitser M, Van Der Vegt S et al (2003) Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron. Ann Oncol 14:1570–1577PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aapro MS, Bertoli L, Lordick F et al (2003) Palonosetron (PALO) is effective in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Supportive Care Cancer 11(6): abstract no. A-17 Aapro MS, Bertoli L, Lordick F et al (2003) Palonosetron (PALO) is effective in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Supportive Care Cancer 11(6): abstract no. A-17
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein EB, Gralla RJ, Eisenberg P et al (2003) Palonosetron (PALO) compared with ondansetron (OND) or dolasetron (DOL) for prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Combined results of two Phase III trials. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22(729):A2932 Rubenstein EB, Gralla RJ, Eisenberg P et al (2003) Palonosetron (PALO) compared with ondansetron (OND) or dolasetron (DOL) for prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Combined results of two Phase III trials. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22(729):A2932
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I et al (2009) Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 10(2):115–124PubMedCrossRef Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I et al (2009) Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 10(2):115–124PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas C, Stathis M, Thomas AG et al (2008) Palonosetron exhibits unique molecular interactions with the 5-HT3 receptor. Anesth Analg 107:469–478PubMedCrossRef Rojas C, Stathis M, Thomas AG et al (2008) Palonosetron exhibits unique molecular interactions with the 5-HT3 receptor. Anesth Analg 107:469–478PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas C, Thomas AG, Alt J et al (2010) Palonosetron triggers 5-HT(3) receptor internalization and causes prolonged inhibition of receptor function. Eur J Pharmacol 626(2–3):193–199PubMedCrossRef Rojas C, Thomas AG, Alt J et al (2010) Palonosetron triggers 5-HT(3) receptor internalization and causes prolonged inhibition of receptor function. Eur J Pharmacol 626(2–3):193–199PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoltz R, Cyong JC, Shah A et al (2004) Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in U.S. and Japanese healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 44:520–531PubMedCrossRef Stoltz R, Cyong JC, Shah A et al (2004) Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in U.S. and Japanese healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 44:520–531PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong EH, Clark R, Leung E et al (1995) The interaction of RS 25259-197, a potent and selective antagonist, with 5-HT3 receptors, in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 114(4):851–859PubMed Wong EH, Clark R, Leung E et al (1995) The interaction of RS 25259-197, a potent and selective antagonist, with 5-HT3 receptors, in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 114(4):851–859PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Double-blind, dose-finding study of four intravenous doses of dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis. J Clin Oncol 16:2937–2942 Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Double-blind, dose-finding study of four intravenous doses of dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis. J Clin Oncol 16:2937–2942
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunberg SM (2007) Antiemetic activity of corticosteroids in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: dosing, efficacy, and tolerability analysis. Ann Oncol 18:233–240PubMedCrossRef Grunberg SM (2007) Antiemetic activity of corticosteroids in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: dosing, efficacy, and tolerability analysis. Ann Oncol 18:233–240PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vardy JL, Chiew K, Galica J et al (2006) Side effects associated with dexamethasone for prophylaxis of delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic therapy. Br J Cancer 94:1011–1015PubMedCrossRef Vardy JL, Chiew K, Galica J et al (2006) Side effects associated with dexamethasone for prophylaxis of delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic therapy. Br J Cancer 94:1011–1015PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran MP, Robinson DM (2009) Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of nausea and vomiting. Drugs 69(13):1853–1878PubMedCrossRef Curran MP, Robinson DM (2009) Aprepitant: a review of its use in the prevention of nausea and vomiting. Drugs 69(13):1853–1878PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Grote T, Hajdenberg J, Cartmell A et al (2006) Combination therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant. J Support Oncol 4:403–408PubMed Grote T, Hajdenberg J, Cartmell A et al (2006) Combination therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant. J Support Oncol 4:403–408PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunberg SM, Dugan M, Muss H et al (2009) Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 17(5):589–594PubMedCrossRef Grunberg SM, Dugan M, Muss H et al (2009) Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 17(5):589–594PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrington JD, Jaskiewicz AD, Song J (2008) Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer 112(9):2080–2087PubMedCrossRef Herrington JD, Jaskiewicz AD, Song J (2008) Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Cancer 112(9):2080–2087PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:103–109PubMed Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:103–109PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Aapro M, Fabi A, Nolè F et al (2010) Double-blind, randomised, controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 1 day with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp584 Aapro M, Fabi A, Nolè F et al (2010) Double-blind, randomised, controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 1 day with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdp584
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Celio L, Bajetta E, Denaro A et al (2009) Single-day regimen of palonosetron (PALO) and dexamethasone (DEX) for the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC): subgroup analysis from a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 9620) Celio L, Bajetta E, Denaro A et al (2009) Single-day regimen of palonosetron (PALO) and dexamethasone (DEX) for the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC): subgroup analysis from a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 9620)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: the aprepitant protocol 052 study group. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4112–4119PubMedCrossRef Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: the aprepitant protocol 052 study group. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4112–4119PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor anatagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97(12):3090–3098PubMedCrossRef Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor anatagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97(12):3090–3098PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S et al (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 17(6):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S et al (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 17(6):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein EB, Slusher BS, Rojas C et al (2006) New approaches to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: from neuropharmacology to clinical investigations. Cancer J 12(5):341–347PubMedCrossRef Rubenstein EB, Slusher BS, Rojas C et al (2006) New approaches to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: from neuropharmacology to clinical investigations. Cancer J 12(5):341–347PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tattersall FD, Rycroft W, Francis B et al (1996) Tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists act centrally to inhibit emesis induced by the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin in ferrets. Neuropharmacol 35:1121–1129CrossRef Tattersall FD, Rycroft W, Francis B et al (1996) Tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists act centrally to inhibit emesis induced by the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin in ferrets. Neuropharmacol 35:1121–1129CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanger GJ (1992) The involvement of 5-HT3 receptors in visceral function. In: Hamon M (ed) Central and peripheral 5-HT3 receptors. Academic Press, London, pp 207–255 Sanger GJ (1992) The involvement of 5-HT3 receptors in visceral function. In: Hamon M (ed) Central and peripheral 5-HT3 receptors. Academic Press, London, pp 207–255
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heitz P, Polak JM, Timson DM et al (1976) Enterochromaffin cells as the endocrine source of gastrointestinal substance P. Histochemistry 49:343–347PubMedCrossRef Heitz P, Polak JM, Timson DM et al (1976) Enterochromaffin cells as the endocrine source of gastrointestinal substance P. Histochemistry 49:343–347PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu WP, You XH, Guan BC et al (2004) Substance P potentiates 5-HT3 receptor-mediated current in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett 365(2):147–152PubMedCrossRef Hu WP, You XH, Guan BC et al (2004) Substance P potentiates 5-HT3 receptor-mediated current in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett 365(2):147–152PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Palonosetron plus 3-day aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy
verfasst von
Flavia Longo
Giovanni Mansueto
Vittoria Lapadula
Rita De Sanctis
Silvia Quadrini
Roberta Grande
Bruno Gori
Amelia Altavilla
I. D’Antoni
Ester Del Signore
Luciano Stumbo
Cristina De Luca
Barbara Cimadon
Enrico Cortesi
Teresa Gamucci
Marisa Di Seri
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0930-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2011

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.