Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 1/2010

01.01.2010 | Guidelines

Gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis

verfasst von: Yasutoshi Kimura, Shinju Arata, Tadahiro Takada, Koichi Hirata, Masahiro Yoshida, Toshihiko Mayumi, Masahiko Hirota, Kazunori Takeda, Toshifumi Gabata, Hodaka Amano, Keita Wada, Miho Sekimoto, Morihisa Hirota, Masamichi Yokoe, Seiki Kiriyama, Tetsuhide Ito

Erschienen in: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In the care of acute pancreatitis, a prompt search for the etiologic condition of the disease should be conducted. A differentiation of gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis should be given top priority in its etiologic diagnosis because it is related to the decision of treatment policy. Examinations necessary for diagnosing gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis include blood tests and ultrasonography. Early ERCP/ES should be performed in patients with gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis if a complication of cholangitis and a prolonged passage disorder of the biliary tract are suspected. The treatment for bile duct stones with the use of ERCP/ES alone is not recommended in cases of gallstone-induced pancreatitis with gallbladder stones. Cholecystectomy for gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis should be performed using a laparoscopic procedure as the first option as soon as the disease has subsided.
Literatur
1.
Koizumi M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:25–32.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Clinico-biochemical prediction of biliary cause of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasonography. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:423–31. (Diagnostic level 2b).CrossRefPubMed
3.
Tenner S, Dubner H, Steinberg W. Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory parameters: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984;89:1863–6. (Diagnostic level 1c).
4.
Wang SS, Lin XZ, Tsai YT, et al. Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical tests in the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas. 1988;3:153–8. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
5.
Pezzilli R, Uomo G, Zerbi A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis: the position statement of the Italian Association for the study of the pancreas. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2008;40:803–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Ammori BJ, Boreham B, Lewis P, et al. The biochemical detection of biliary etiology of acute pancreatitis on admission: a revisit in the modern era of biliary imaging. Pancreas. 2003;26:e32–5. (Diagnostic level 2b).CrossRefPubMed
7.
Andersen JM, Hedstrom J, Kemppainen E, et al. The ratio of trypsin-2- α 1-antitrypsin to trypsinogen-1 discriminates biliary and alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis. Clin Chem. 2001;47:231–6. (Diagnostic level 1b).PubMed
8.
Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan HKF, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:325–30. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
9.
Fogel EL, Sherman S. Acute biliary pancreatitis: when should the endoscopist intervene? Gastroenterology. 2003;125:229–35. (Diagnostic level 4).CrossRefPubMed
10.
Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SW, et al. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1051–7. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
11.
British Society of Gastroenterology. United Kingdom guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1998;42(Suppl. 2):S1–13.
12.
Chak A, Hawes RH, Cooper GS, et al. Prospective assessment of the utility of EUS in the evaluation of gallstone pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:599–604. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
13.
Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JKF, et al. EUS for detection of occult cholelithiasis in patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:28–32. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
14.
Norton SA, Alderson D. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1650–5. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
15.
Frossard JL, Sosa-Valencia L, Amouyal G, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Am J Med. 2000;109:196–200. (Diagnostic level 3b).CrossRefPubMed
16.
Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Comparison of early endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1238–44. (Diagnostic level 1b).CrossRefPubMed
17.
Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, et al. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988;2:979–83. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:228–32. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
19.
Nowak A, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek TA, et al. Final results of the prospective, randomized, controlled study on endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conventional management in acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:A380. (abstract; Level of treatment/prevention 1b).
20.
Fölsch UR, Nitsche R, Ludtke R, et al. Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:237–42. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
21.
Sharma VK, Howden CW. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3211–4. (Level of treatment/prevention 1a).CrossRefPubMed
22.
Heinrich S, Schafer M, Rousson V, et al. Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):154–68. (Level of treatment/prevention 1a).CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ayub K, Imada R, Slavin J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18:CD003630. (Level of treatment/prevention 1a).
24.
Moretti A, Papi C, Aratari A, et al. Is early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography useful in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:379–85.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Petrov MS, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Surg. 2008;247:250–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Petrov MS, Uchugina AF, Kukosh MV. Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduce the risk of local pancreatic complications in acute pancreatitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2338–43.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zhou MQ, Li NP, Lu RD. Duodenoscopy in treatment of acute gallstone pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2002;1:608–10. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).PubMed
28.
Chen WX, Li YM, Gao DJ, et al. Application of endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute pancreatitis with fluid collection: a prospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:3636–9. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).PubMed
29.
Acosta JM, Katkhouda N, Debian KA, et al. Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243:33–40. (Level of treatment/prevention1b).CrossRefPubMed
30.
Oría A, Cimmino D, Ocampo C, et al. Early endoscopic intervention versus early conservative management in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and biliopancreatic obstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Kurisu S, Matsuda S, Oyabu H, et al. Evaluation of urgent treatment for impacted bile duct stones. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992;93(9):1128–31. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
32.
Yu W, Li W, Wang Z, et al. Early percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and papillotomy treatment for severe gallstone associated acute pancreatitis. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:187–91.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Kaneko H, Harada H, Kasugai T, et al. Report on the 4th national survey on incidental diseases associated with digestive endoscopy; five years’ data from 1998–2002. Gastoroenterol Endosc. 2004;46:54–61. (Level of etiology/adverse effects/4).
34.
Rosseland AR, Solhaug JH. Early or delayed endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1984;199(2):165–7. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
35.
Uomo G, Galloro V, Rabitti PG, et al. Early endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: report of 50 cases. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1991;23:564–6. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
36.
Aiyer MK, Burdick JS, Sonnenberg A. Outcome of surgical and endoscopic management of biliary pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(8):1684–90. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
37.
Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Comparison of early endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(12):1238–44. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
38.
Welbourn CR, Beckly DE, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy for gall stone pancreatitis. Gut. 1995;37:119–20. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
39.
Siegel JH, Veerappan A, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary pancreatitis: an alternative to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:573–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
40.
Kaw M, Al-Antably Y, Kaw P. Management of gallstone pancreatitis: cholecystectomy or ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(1):61–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 2b).CrossRefPubMed
41.
Gislason H, Vetrhus M, Horn A, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective study of the late outcome. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(3):204–8. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
42.
Vazquez-Lglesias JL, Gonzalez-Conde B, Lopez-Roses L, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for prevention of the recurrence of acute biliary pancreatitis in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term follow-up of 88 patients. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(10):1442–6. (Epub 26 Aug 2004; Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
43.
Targarona EM, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients. Lancet. 1996;347:926–9. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
44.
Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:761–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
45.
Lau JY, Leow CK, Fung TM. Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:96–103. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
46.
Stone HH, Fabian TC, Dunlop WE. Gallstone pancreatitis: biliary tract pathology in relation to time of operation. Ann Surg. 1981;194:305–12. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
47.
Kelly TR, Wagner DS. Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial of the timing of surgery. Surgery. 1988;104:600–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).PubMed
48.
Taylor E, Wong C. The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg. 2004;70:971–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
49.
Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM. Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg. 2004;239:741–9. (discussion 749–51; Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
50.
Ranson JH. The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1979;189:654–63. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
51.
Frei GJ, Frei VT, Thirlby RC, et al. Biliary pancreatitis: clinical presentation and surgical management. Am J Surg. 1986;151:170–5. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
52.
DeIorio Av Jr, Vitale GC, Reynolds M, et al. Acute biliary pancreatitis. The roles of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:392–6. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
53.
Rhodes M, Armstrong CP, Longstaff A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute gallstone pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:247. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
54.
Tate JJ, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1994;81:720–2. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
55.
Ballestra-Lopez C, Bastida-Vila X, Bettonica-Larranaga C, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute biliary pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:718–21. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
56.
Ricci F, Castaldini G, de Manzoni G, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1179–82. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
57.
Uhl W, Muller CA, Krahenbuhl L, et al. Acute gallstone pancreatitis: timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild and severe disease. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1070–6. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
58.
Chang L, Lo S, Stabile BE, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231:82–7. (Level of treatment/prevention 1b).CrossRefPubMed
59.
Rijna H, Borgstein PJ, Meuwissen SG, et al. Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic biliary surgery. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1130–3. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).CrossRefPubMed
60.
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1781–8. (Level of etiology/adverse effects 4).CrossRefPubMed
61.
Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla A. Early versus delayed single-stage laparoscopic eradication for both gallstones and common bile duct stones in mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Am Surg. 2005;71(8):682–6. (Level of treatment/prevention 4).PubMed
62.
Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:492–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis
verfasst von
Yasutoshi Kimura
Shinju Arata
Tadahiro Takada
Koichi Hirata
Masahiro Yoshida
Toshihiko Mayumi
Masahiko Hirota
Kazunori Takeda
Toshifumi Gabata
Hodaka Amano
Keita Wada
Miho Sekimoto
Morihisa Hirota
Masamichi Yokoe
Seiki Kiriyama
Tetsuhide Ito
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2010
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1868-6974
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-6982
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0217-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Guidelines

Foreword

Guidelines

Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis according to new prognostic factors and CT grading

Announcement

A new name for our journal

Guidelines

Post-ERCP pancreatitis

Guidelines

Changes in management of acute pancreatitis before and after the publication of evidence-based practice guidelines in 2003

Guidelines

Cutting-edge information for the management of acute pancreatitis

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise