nach oben

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Erschienen in:

Open Access 10.03.2020 | General Review

Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

verfasst von: Filippo Migliorini, Paolo Aretini, Arne Driessen, Yasser El Mansy, Valentin Quack, Markus Tingart, Jörg Eschweiler

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Alternatives to the classical medial parapatellar (MPP) approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the mini-medial parapatellar (MMPP), mini-subvastus (MSV), mini-midvastus (MMV) and quadriceps-sparing (QS) approaches. The best approach has been not fully clarified. The purpose of the present study was to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing these approaches.

Materials and methods

The present analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. The databases search was performed in October 2019. All clinical trials comparing two or more approaches for primary TKA were considered for inclusion. The baseline comparability was evaluated through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The statistical analysis was performed through the STATA software/MP. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis was adopted in all the comparisons.

Results

Data from 52 articles (4533 patients) were collected. The mean follow-up was 20.38 months. With regard to diagnosis, gender, age and BMI, adequate baseline comparability was detected. The MSV approach ranked better concerning clinical scores (the lowest visual analogic scale, the higher KSS and KSFS) and functional outcomes (the shortest straight leg raise, the greatest degree of flexion and range of motion). Concerning perioperative data, the MSV evidenced the shortest hospital stay, while the MPP the shortest surgical duration and lowest estimated blood loss.

Conclusion

According to the main findings of the present study, the mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty demonstrated superior overall compared to the other approaches. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider this approach in the light of the evidence and limitations of this Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Langenbeck B (1878) Zur Resection des Kniegelenks. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie 8:23

Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, Sensi L (2005) Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:82–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000185755.09777.2dCrossRefPubMed

Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, Pittors K, Davis J, Shim JC, Pavlov H, Petersen M (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000148582.86102.47CrossRef

Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8(1):20–27 (discussion 27)PubMed

Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE (1991) Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:70–77

Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL (1997) A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12(3):322–331CrossRefPubMed

Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM (2003) Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093030.56370.d9CrossRef

Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C (2004) Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000148574.79874.d0CrossRef

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catala-Lopez F, Gotzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385CrossRefPubMed

10.

Urban LM (1981) The straight-leg-raising test: a review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2(3):117–133. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1981.2.3.117CrossRefPubMed

11.

Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Rath B (2019) Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(4):937–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02370-1CrossRefPubMed

12.

de Morton NA (2009) The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 55(2):129–133CrossRefPubMed

13.

Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L (2006) Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238789.51972.16CrossRefPubMed

14.

Aslam MA, Sabir AB, Tiwari V, Abbas S, Tiwari A, Singh P (2017) Approach to total knee replacement: a randomized double blind study between medial parapatellar and midvastus approach in the early postoperative period in asian population. J Knee Surg 30(8):793–797. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597978CrossRefPubMed

15.

Avci CC, Gulabi D, Erdem M, Kurnaz R, Gunes T, Bostan B (2013) Minimal invasive midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bridgman SA, Walley G, MacKenzie G, Clement D, Griffiths D, Maffulli N (2009) Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 16(3):216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.012CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD, Stroh DA, Seyler TM, Mont MA (2010) A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(3):575–582. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00268CrossRef

18.

Chalidis BE, Petsatodis G, Christodoulou AG, Christoforidis J, Papadopoulos PP, Pournaras J (2010) Is obesity a contraindication for minimal invasive total knee replacement? A prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg 20(12):1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9968-6CrossRefPubMed

19.

Cho KY, Kim KI, Umrani S, Kim SH (2014) Better quadriceps recovery after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(8):1759–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2556-2CrossRefPubMed

20.

Dabboussi N, Sakr M, Girard J, Fakih R (2012) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study to the standard approach. N Am J Med Sci 4(2):81–85. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.93381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Feczko P, Engelmann L, Arts JJ, Campbell D (2016) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: a prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0872-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Han I, Seong SC, Lee S, Yoo JH, Lee MC (2008) Simultaneous bilateral MIS-TKA results in faster functional recovery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1449–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0216-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Heekin RD, Fokin AA (2014) Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: outcomes pendulum is at equilibrium. J Arthroplasty 29(2):339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.016CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hernandez-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Suarez-Vazquez A (2010) Total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. Similar results at six months follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Huang AB, Wang HJ, Yu JK, Yang B, Ma D, Zhang JY (2015) Are there any clinical and radiographic differences between quadriceps-sparing and mini-medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty after a minimum 5 years of follow-up? Chin Med J (Engl) 128(14):1898–1904. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.160521CrossRef

26.

Jarvis SL, Onstot BR, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ (2013) Differences between midvastus and subvastus TKA surgical approaches in the tasks of sitting and standing. J Knee Surg 26(5):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1333904CrossRefPubMed

27.

Jung YB, Lee YS, Lee EY, Jung HJ, Nam CH (2009) Comparison of the modified subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33(2):419–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0510-yCrossRefPubMed

28.

Juosponis R, Tarasevicius S, Smailys A, Kalesinskas RJ (2009) Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop 33(5):1233–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0630-zCrossRefPubMed

29.

Karachalios T, Giotikas D, Roidis N, Poultsides L, Bargiotas K, Malizos KN (2008) Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(5):584–591. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20122CrossRef

30.

Karpman RR, Smith HL (2009) Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 24(5):681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.011CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kim JG, Lee SW, Ha JK, Choi HJ, Yang SJ, Lee MY (2011) The effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty to preserve quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 18(6):443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.08.008CrossRefPubMed

32.

King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC, Leopold SS (2007) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(7):1497–1503. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00867CrossRef

33.

Li Z, Cheng W, Sun L, Yao Y, Cao Q, Ye S, Qi L, Xu S, Wu X, Jing J (2018) Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Orthop 42(3):543–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3703-zCrossRefPubMed

34.

Liebensteiner MC, Krismer M, Koller A, Semenitz B, Mayr E (2012) Does minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improve isokinetic torque? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3233–3239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2545-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Lin WP, Lin J, Horng LC, Chang SM, Jiang CC (2009) Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty 24(7):1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.005CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lin SY, Chen CH, Fu YC, Huang PJ, Lu CC, Su JY, Chang JK, Huang HT (2013) Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of three minimally invasive techniques for total knee replacement at two years. Bone Jt J 95(7):906–910. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.29694CrossRef

37.

Liu H, Mei X, Zhang Z, Sun J (2015) Mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with 24-month follow-up. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 49(6):586–592. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0078CrossRefPubMed

38.

Maru M, Akra G, McMurtry I, Port A (2009) A prospective comparative study of the midvastus and medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the early postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 19(7):473–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-009-0452-8CrossRef

39.

McAllister CM, Stepanian JD (2008) The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.011CrossRefPubMed

40.

Mehta NBM, Goyal A, Mishra P, Joshi D, Chaudhary D (2017) Quadriceps sparing (subvastus/midvastus) approach versus the conventional medial parapatellar approach in primary knee arthroplasty. J Arthrosc J Surg 4(1):15–20CrossRef

41.

Mukherjee P, Press J, Hockings M (2009) Mid-vastus vs medial para-patellar approach in tota knee replacement—time to discharge. Iowa Orthop J 29:19–22PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Nestor BJ, Toulson CE, Backus SI, Lyman SL, Foote KL, Windsor RE (2010) Mini-midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(6 Suppl):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.003CrossRefPubMed

43.

Nutton RW, Wade FA, Coutts FJ, van der Linden ML (2014) Short term recovery of function following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study of the medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches. Arthritis 2014:173857. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/173857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Pescador D, Moreno AA, Blanco JF, Garcia I (2011) Long-term analysis of minimally invasive surgery in knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Mex 25(6):353–358PubMed

45.

Pongcharoen B, Yakampor T, Charoencholvanish K (2013) Patellar tracking and anterior knee pain are similar after medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1654–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2778-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Rahman OAM (2015) Less invasive versus standard total knee replacement: comparison of early outcome. J Pak Med Assoc 65:82–86

47.

Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr AR (2008) Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.100CrossRefPubMed

48.

Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR, Park SJ, Bae BH, Cho SG (2007) Comparison of functional results with navigation-assisted minimally invasive and conventional techniques in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 12(3):189–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10929080701311861CrossRefPubMed

49.

Dayton MR, Bade MJ, Muratore T, Shulman BC, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2013) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: surgical implications for recovery. J Knee Surg 26(3):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1327449CrossRefPubMed

50.

Stevens-Lapsley JE, Bade MJ, Shulman BC, Kohrt WM, Dayton MR (2012) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improves early knee strength but not functional performance: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 27(10):1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Tasker A, Hassaballa M, Murray J, Lancaster S, Artz N, Harries W, Porteous A (2014) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up. Knee 21(1):189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010CrossRefPubMed

52.

Tenholder M, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR (2005) Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000185450.89364.10CrossRefPubMed

53.

Thienpont E (2013) Faster recovery after minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2412–2417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1978-6CrossRefPubMed

54.

Tsuji S, Tomita T, Fujii M, Laskin RS, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery-total knee arthroplasty truly less invasive than standard total knee arthroplasty? A quantitative evaluation. J Arthroplasty 25(6):970–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.016CrossRefPubMed

55.

Unnanuntana A, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Mow CS (2012) Minimally invasive and standard total knee arthroplasty result in similar clinical outcomes at a minimum of five-year follow-up. J Med Assoc Thail 95(Suppl 9):S29–S35

56.

Unwin O, Hassaballa M, Murray J, Harries W, Porteous A (2017) Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total knee replacement; medium term results with minimum five year follow-up. Knee 24(2):454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.01.010CrossRefPubMed

57.

Varela-Egocheaga JR, Suarez-Suarez MA, Fernandez-Villan M, Gonzalez-Sastre V, Varela-Gomez JR, Rodriguez-Merchan C (2010) Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(5):1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1160-8CrossRefPubMed

58.

Watanabe T, Muneta T, Ishizuki M (2009) Is a minimally invasive approach superior to a conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty? Early outcome and 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Orthop Sci 14(5):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1383-2CrossRefPubMed

59.

Wegrzyn J, Parratte S, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Pagnano MW (2013) The John Insall award: no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2486-1CrossRefPubMed

60.

Wulker N, Lambermont JP, Sacchetti L, Lazaro JG, Nardi J (2010) A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(7):1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01070CrossRef

61.

Zhang Z, Gu B, Zhu W, Zhu L, Li Q, Du Y (2014) Minimally invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(8):1475–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1313-zCrossRefPubMed

62.

Zhu M, Ang CL, Yeo SJ, Lo NN, Chia SL, Chong HC (2016) Minimally invasive computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective 9-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 31(5):1000–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.023CrossRefPubMed

63.

Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T (2006) Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2(1):70–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-005-0130-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Dalury DF, Dennis DA (2005) Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000185757.17401.7bCrossRefPubMed

65.

Cheng T, Liu T, Zhang G, Peng X, Zhang X (2010) Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(6):1635–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1285-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Zan P, Wu Z, Yu X, Fan L, Xu T, Li G (2016) The effect of patella eversion on clinical outcome measures in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 31(3):637–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.040CrossRefPubMed

67.

Wohlrab D, Gutteck N, Hildebrand M, Zeh A, Hein W (2008) Influence of the surgical approach on postoperative rehabilitation after TKA. Z Orthop Unfallchirurgie 146(2):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1038398CrossRef

68.

Niki Y, Mochizuki T, Momohara S, Saito S, Toyama Y, Matsumoto H (2009) Is minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty really minimally invasive surgery? J Arthroplasty 24(4):499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.002CrossRefPubMed

69.

Huang Z, Shen B, Ma J, Yang J, Zhou Z, Kang P, Pei F (2012) Mini-midvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in TKA: muscle damage and inflammation markers. Orthopedics 35(7):e1038–e1045. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20120621-17CrossRefPubMed

70.

Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M, Tan J, Simsek SA, Kanatli U, Ozturk A (2002) Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122(2):65–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020100319CrossRefPubMed

71.

Engh GA, Parks NL (1998) Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 351:270–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199806000-00032CrossRef

72.

Pan WM, Li XG, Tang TS, Qian ZL, Zhang Q, Zhang CM (2010) Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res 38(3):890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315CrossRefPubMed

73.

Jojima H, Whiteside LA, Ogata K (2004) Anatomic consideration of nerve supply to the vastus medialis in knee surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:157–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000128642.61260.b3CrossRef

74.

Pagnano MW, Meneghini RM, Trousdale RT (2006) Anatomy of the extensor mechanism in reference to quadriceps-sparing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:102–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238788.44349.0fCrossRefPubMed

75.

Faure BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B, Volz RG, Schutte D (1993) Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(5):511–516CrossRefPubMed

76.

Scheibel MT, Schmidt W, Thomas M, von Salis-Soglio G (2002) A detailed anatomical description of the subvastus region and its clinical relevance for the subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 24(1):6–12CrossRefPubMed

77.

Alcelik I, Sukeik M, Pollock R, Misra A, Naguib A, Haddad FS (2012) Comparing the mid-vastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of short term outcomes. Knee 19(4):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.010CrossRefPubMed

78.

Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB (1996) Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Effect of a lateral release and sacrifice of the superior lateral geniculate artery. J Arthroplasty 11(4):368–372CrossRefPubMed

79.

Archibeck MJ, Camarata D, Trauger J, Allman J, White RE Jr (2003) Indications for lateral retinacular release in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:157–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000079260.91782.96CrossRef

80.

Liu Z, Yang H (2011) Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 39(5):1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001103900503CrossRefPubMed

81.

Li XG, Tang TS, Qian ZL, Huang LX, Pan WM, Zhu RF (2010) Comparison of the mini-midvastus with the mini-medial parapatellar approach in primary TKA. Orthopedics 33(10):723. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100826-04CrossRefPubMed

82.

Khakha RS, Chowdhry M, Norris M, Kheiran A, Patel N, Chauhan SK (2014) Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA)—a population matched study. Knee 21(5):944–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.06.007CrossRefPubMed

83.

Peng X, Zhang X, Cheng T, Cheng M, Wang J (2015) Comparison of the quadriceps-sparing and subvastus approaches versus the standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0783-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Chiang H, Lee CC, Lin WP, Jiang CC (2012) Comparison of quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive and medial parapatellar total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up study. J Formos Med Assoc 111(12):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2011.11.025CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
verfasst von: Filippo Migliorini
Paolo Aretini
Arne Driessen
Yasser El Mansy
Valentin Quack
Markus Tingart
Jörg Eschweiler
Publikationsdatum: 10.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Internistische Arzneimitteltherapie Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis