Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018

11.12.2017 | Original Article

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy and perioperative outcomes of limited versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan

verfasst von: Shuichi Morizane, Masashi Honda, Satoshi Fukasawa, Atsushi Komaru, Junichi Inokuchi, Masatoshi Eto, Masaki Shimbo, Kazunori Hattori, Yoshiaki Kawano, Atsushi Takenaka

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We conducted a retrospective study to compare the perioperative course and lymph node (LN) counts of patients undergoing limited pelvic lymphadenectomy (lPLND) or extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in an initial Japanese series.

Methods

The cohort included 1333 patients who underwent either lPLND (n = 902) or ePLND (n = 431) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at five institutions in Japan. All complications within 28 days of surgery were recorded, and clinical data were collected retrospectively. The outcomes and complications were compared relative to the extent of lymphadenectomy, and we conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the predictors of the major complications.

Results

On multivariate analysis for evaluating the associations between major complications and perioperative characteristics, console time (p = 0.001) was significantly associated with major complications, although the extent of lymphadenectomy (p = 0.272) was not significantly associated with major complications. In the distribution of positive LNs removed in the extended pelvic lymphadenectomy cohort, 60.4% of patients had positive LNs only in the obturator/internal iliac region. However, 22.6% of the patients with positive LNs had no positive LNs in the obturator/internal iliac region, but only in the external/common iliac region.

Conclusions

ePLND, which significantly increased the console time and blood loss but nearly quadrupled the lymph node yield, is considered a relatively safe and acceptable procedure. Moreover, the results of this study suggest that ePLND improves staging and removes a greater number of metastatic nodes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P et al (2008) 11C-Choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. Eur Urol 54:392–401CrossRefPubMed Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P et al (2008) 11C-Choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. Eur Urol 54:392–401CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hovels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM et al (2008) The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 63:387–395CrossRefPubMed Hovels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM et al (2008) The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 63:387–395CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61–71CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61–71CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B et al (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8:162–200CrossRef Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B et al (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8:162–200CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang EH, Yu JB, Gross CP et al (2015) Variation in pelvic lymph node dissection among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by hospital characteristics and surgical approach: results from the National Cancer Database. J Urol 193:820–825CrossRefPubMed Wang EH, Yu JB, Gross CP et al (2015) Variation in pelvic lymph node dissection among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by hospital characteristics and surgical approach: results from the National Cancer Database. J Urol 193:820–825CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Suardi N, Larcher A, Haese A et al (2014) Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions. Eur Urol 66:635–643CrossRefPubMed Suardi N, Larcher A, Haese A et al (2014) Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions. Eur Urol 66:635–643CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Briganti A, Karnes JR, Da Pozzo LF et al (2009) Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 55:261–270CrossRefPubMed Briganti A, Karnes JR, Da Pozzo LF et al (2009) Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol 55:261–270CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Masterson TA, Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ et al (2006) The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 175:1320–1324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Masterson TA, Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ et al (2006) The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 175:1320–1324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Joslyn SA, Konety BR (2006) Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 68:121–125CrossRefPubMed Joslyn SA, Konety BR (2006) Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 68:121–125CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R (2002) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 167:1681–1686CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R (2002) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 167:1681–1686CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Feifer AH, Elkin EB, Lowrance WT et al (2011) Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Cancer (Phila) 117:3933–3942CrossRef Feifer AH, Elkin EB, Lowrance WT et al (2011) Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Cancer (Phila) 117:3933–3942CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Naito S, Kuroiwa K, Kinukawa N et al (2008) Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol 180:904–909CrossRefPubMed Naito S, Kuroiwa K, Kinukawa N et al (2008) Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. J Urol 180:904–909CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A et al (2014) Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications–a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 65:7–16CrossRefPubMed Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A et al (2014) Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications–a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 65:7–16CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R et al (2012) Lymph node count threshold for optimal pelvic lymph node staging in prostate cancer. Int J Urol 19:645–651CrossRefPubMed Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R et al (2012) Lymph node count threshold for optimal pelvic lymph node staging in prostate cancer. Int J Urol 19:645–651CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuh BE, Ruel NH, Mejia R et al (2013) Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 112:81–88CrossRefPubMed Yuh BE, Ruel NH, Mejia R et al (2013) Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 112:81–88CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Tillier C et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: nodal dissection results during the first 440 cases by two surgeons. J Endourol 26:1618–1624CrossRefPubMed van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Tillier C et al (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: nodal dissection results during the first 440 cases by two surgeons. J Endourol 26:1618–1624CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz DJ, Yee DS, Godoy G et al (2010) Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection. BJU Int 106:391–396CrossRefPubMed Katz DJ, Yee DS, Godoy G et al (2010) Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection. BJU Int 106:391–396CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis JW, Shah JB, Achim M (2011) Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP): a video-based illustration of technique, results, and unmet patient selection needs. BJU Int 108:993–998CrossRefPubMed Davis JW, Shah JB, Achim M (2011) Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP): a video-based illustration of technique, results, and unmet patient selection needs. BJU Int 108:993–998CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liss MA, Palazzi K, Stroup SP et al (2013) Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31:481–488CrossRefPubMed Liss MA, Palazzi K, Stroup SP et al (2013) Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31:481–488CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al (2011) Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 108:1185–1190CrossRefPubMed Orvieto MA, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al (2011) Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 108:1185–1190CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone NN, Stock RG, Unger P (1997) Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques. J Urol 158:1891–1894CrossRefPubMed Stone NN, Stock RG, Unger P (1997) Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques. J Urol 158:1891–1894CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS et al (2003) Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169:145–147CrossRefPubMed Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS et al (2003) Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169:145–147CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A et al (2006) Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 50:1006–1013CrossRefPubMed Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A et al (2006) Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 50:1006–1013CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Eden CG, Arora A, Rouse P (2010) Extended vs. standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 106:537–542CrossRefPubMed Eden CG, Arora A, Rouse P (2010) Extended vs. standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 106:537–542CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen K, Miura T, Sakai I (2015) Intraoperative fluorescence imaging for detection of sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels during open prostatectomy using indocyanine green. J Urol 194:371–377CrossRefPubMed Yuen K, Miura T, Sakai I (2015) Intraoperative fluorescence imaging for detection of sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels during open prostatectomy using indocyanine green. J Urol 194:371–377CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy and perioperative outcomes of limited versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan
verfasst von
Shuichi Morizane
Masashi Honda
Satoshi Fukasawa
Atsushi Komaru
Junichi Inokuchi
Masatoshi Eto
Masaki Shimbo
Kazunori Hattori
Yoshiaki Kawano
Atsushi Takenaka
Publikationsdatum
11.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1223-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

ADT zur Radiatio nach Prostatektomie: Wenn, dann wohl länger

24.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.

Das sind die führenden Symptome junger Darmkrebspatienten

Darmkrebserkrankungen in jüngeren Jahren sind ein zunehmendes Problem, das häufig längere Zeit übersehen wird, gerade weil die Patienten noch nicht alt sind. Welche Anzeichen Ärzte stutzig machen sollten, hat eine Metaanalyse herausgearbeitet.

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.