Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control 7/2008

01.09.2008 | Original Paper

Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study

verfasst von: Mary Catherine Schumacher, Martha L. Slattery, Anne P. Lanier, Khe-Ni Ma, Sandra Edwards, Elizabeth D. Ferucci, Lillian Tom-Orme

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 7/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska Native people living in Alaska and in the Southwest US, and to investigate predictive factors associated with receiving each of the cancer screening tests.

Methods

We used the Education and Research Towards Health (EARTH) Study to measure self-reported cancer screening prevalence rates among 11,358 study participants enrolled in 2004–2007. We used prevalence odds ratios to examine demographic, lifestyle and medical factors associated with receiving age- and sex-appropriate cancer screening tests.

Results

The prevalence rates of all the screening tests were higher in Alaska than in the Southwest. Pap test in the past 3 years was reported by 75.1% of women in Alaska and 64.6% of women in the Southwest. Mammography in the past 2 years was reported by 64.6% of women aged 40 years and older in Alaska and 44.0% of those in the Southwest. Colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years was reported by 41.1% of study participants aged 50 years and older in Alaska and by 11.7% of those in the Southwest US. Multivariate analysis found that location (Alaska versus the Southwest), higher educational status, income and the presence of one or more chronic medical condition predicted each of the three screening tests. Additional predictors of Pap test were age (women aged 25–39 years more likely to be screened than older or younger women), marital status (ever married more likely to be screened), and language spoken at home (speakers of American Indian Alaska Native language only less likely to be screened). Additional predictors of mammography were age (women aged 50 years and older were more likely to be screened than those aged 40–49 years), positive family history of breast cancer, use of smokeless tobacco (never users more likely to be screened), and urban/rural residency (urban residents more likely to be screened). Additional predictors of colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy were age (men and women aged 60 years and older slightly more likely to be screened than those aged 50–59 years), family history of any cancer, family history of colorectal cancer, former smoking, language spoken at home (speakers of American Indian Alaska Native language less likely to be screened), and urban/rural residence (urban residents more likely to be screened).

Conclusion

Programs to improve screening among American Indian and Alaska Native people should include efforts to reach individuals of lower socioeconomic status and who do not have regular contact with the medical care system. Special attention should be made to identify and provide needed services to those who live in rural areas, and to those living in the Southwest US.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Indian Health Service (2000) Trends in Indian health 1998–1999. Indian Health Service, Rockville Indian Health Service (2000) Trends in Indian health 1998–1999. Indian Health Service, Rockville
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehrsam G, Lanier A, Holck P, Sandidge J (2001) Cancer mortality among Alaska Natives 1994–1998. Alaska Med 43:50–60PubMed Ehrsam G, Lanier A, Holck P, Sandidge J (2001) Cancer mortality among Alaska Natives 1994–1998. Alaska Med 43:50–60PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Espey D, Paisano R, Cobb N (2005) Regional patterns and trends in cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990–2001. Cancer 103:1045–1053PubMedCrossRef Espey D, Paisano R, Cobb N (2005) Regional patterns and trends in cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990–2001. Cancer 103:1045–1053PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Swan J, Edwards BK (2003) Cancer rates among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Is there a national perspective. Cancer 98:1262–1272PubMedCrossRef Swan J, Edwards BK (2003) Cancer rates among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Is there a national perspective. Cancer 98:1262–1272PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Blackman DK (1999) Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States, 1992–1997. Prev Med 29:287–295PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Blackman DK (1999) Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States, 1992–1997. Prev Med 29:287–295PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Risendal B, Roe D, DeZapein J, Papenfuss M, Giuliano A (1999) Influence of health care, cost and culture on breast cancer screening: issues facing urban American Indian women. Prev Med 29:501–509PubMedCrossRef Risendal B, Roe D, DeZapein J, Papenfuss M, Giuliano A (1999) Influence of health care, cost and culture on breast cancer screening: issues facing urban American Indian women. Prev Med 29:501–509PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliano A, Papenfuss M, de Zapien JG, Tilousi S, Nuvayestewa L (1998) Breast cancer screening among Southwest American Indian women living on-reservation. Prev Med 27:135–143PubMedCrossRef Giuliano A, Papenfuss M, de Zapien JG, Tilousi S, Nuvayestewa L (1998) Breast cancer screening among Southwest American Indian women living on-reservation. Prev Med 27:135–143PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54:78–93PubMed Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54:78–93PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Denny CH, Holtzman D, Cobb N (2003) Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives: findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1997–2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(SS07):1–13PubMed Denny CH, Holtzman D, Cobb N (2003) Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives: findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1997–2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(SS07):1–13PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KF, Mokdad A, Ballew C et al (1997) The health of Navajo women: Findings from the Navajo Health and Nutrition Survey, 1991–1992. J Nutr 127:2128S–2133SPubMed Strauss KF, Mokdad A, Ballew C et al (1997) The health of Navajo women: Findings from the Navajo Health and Nutrition Survey, 1991–1992. J Nutr 127:2128S–2133SPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilliland FD, Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Stauber P, Key CR (2000) Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1994–1997. Am J Epidemiol 152:432–437PubMedCrossRef Gilliland FD, Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Stauber P, Key CR (2000) Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1994–1997. Am J Epidemiol 152:432–437PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Swan J, Breen N, Burhansstipanov L, Satter DE, Davis WW, McNeel T, Snipp CM (2006) Cancer screening and risk factor rates among American Indians. Am J Public Health 96:340–350PubMedCrossRef Swan J, Breen N, Burhansstipanov L, Satter DE, Davis WW, McNeel T, Snipp CM (2006) Cancer screening and risk factor rates among American Indians. Am J Public Health 96:340–350PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Satter DE, Seals BF, Chia J, Gatchell M, Burhansstipanov L, Tsai L (2005) American Indian and Alaska Natives in California: women’s cancer screening and results. J Cancer Educ 20(Suppl):58–64PubMedCrossRef Satter DE, Seals BF, Chia J, Gatchell M, Burhansstipanov L, Tsai L (2005) American Indian and Alaska Natives in California: women’s cancer screening and results. J Cancer Educ 20(Suppl):58–64PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanier AP, Kelly JJ, Holck P(1999) Pap prevalence and cervical cancer prevention among Alaska Native women. Health Care Women Int 20:471–486PubMedCrossRef Lanier AP, Kelly JJ, Holck P(1999) Pap prevalence and cervical cancer prevention among Alaska Native women. Health Care Women Int 20:471–486PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Provost EM (1996) Cervical cancer screening on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska. Cancer 78:1598–1602PubMed Provost EM (1996) Cervical cancer screening on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska. Cancer 78:1598–1602PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Giroux J, Welty TK, Oliver FK, Kaur JS, Leonardson G, Cobb N (2000) Low national breast and cervical cancer-screening rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women with diabetes. J Am Board Fam Pract 13:239–245PubMed Giroux J, Welty TK, Oliver FK, Kaur JS, Leonardson G, Cobb N (2000) Low national breast and cervical cancer-screening rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women with diabetes. J Am Board Fam Pract 13:239–245PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Slattery M, Schumacher MC, Lanier AP et al (2007) A prospective cohort of American Indians and Alaska Natives: study design, methods, and implementation. Am J Epidemiol 166:606–615PubMedCrossRef Slattery M, Schumacher MC, Lanier AP et al (2007) A prospective cohort of American Indians and Alaska Natives: study design, methods, and implementation. Am J Epidemiol 166:606–615PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Federal Register: March 15, 2002 (Vol 67, Number 51) Federal Register: March 15, 2002 (Vol 67, Number 51)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce N (2004) Effect measures in prevalence studies. Environ Health Perspect 112:1047–1050PubMedCrossRef Pearce N (2004) Effect measures in prevalence studies. Environ Health Perspect 112:1047–1050PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeney C, Schmitz KH, Lazovich D, Virnig BA, Wallace RB, Folsom AR (2006) Functional limitations in elderly female cancer survivors. J Nat Cancer Inst 98:521–529PubMedCrossRef Sweeney C, Schmitz KH, Lazovich D, Virnig BA, Wallace RB, Folsom AR (2006) Functional limitations in elderly female cancer survivors. J Nat Cancer Inst 98:521–529PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson ML, Meyers JE, Krieble D (1998) Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med 55:272–277PubMedCrossRef Thompson ML, Meyers JE, Krieble D (1998) Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occup Environ Med 55:272–277PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Indian Health Service, Clinical reporting system version 5.1, reporting year 1 July 2004 to 20 June 2005 Indian Health Service, Clinical reporting system version 5.1, reporting year 1 July 2004 to 20 June 2005
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Social Services, State of Alaska, (2006) Health risks in Alaska among adults. Alaska behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2002/2003 Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Social Services, State of Alaska, (2006) Health risks in Alaska among adults. Alaska behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2002/2003
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs EA, Karavolos K, Rathouz PJ, Ferris TG, Powell LH (2005) Limited English proficiency and breast and cervical cancer screening in a multiethnic population. Am J Public Health 95:1410–1416PubMedCrossRef Jacobs EA, Karavolos K, Rathouz PJ, Ferris TG, Powell LH (2005) Limited English proficiency and breast and cervical cancer screening in a multiethnic population. Am J Public Health 95:1410–1416PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D et al (2004) Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 101:495–507PubMedCrossRef Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D et al (2004) Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 101:495–507PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon TGA, Gottlieb NH (1999) Measures of American Indian traditionality and its relationship to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 20:493–504PubMedCrossRef Solomon TGA, Gottlieb NH (1999) Measures of American Indian traditionality and its relationship to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 20:493–504PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Coronado GD, Thompson B, Koepsell TD, Schwartz SM, McLerran D (2004) Use of Pap test among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural setting. Prev Med 38:713–722PubMedCrossRef Coronado GD, Thompson B, Koepsell TD, Schwartz SM, McLerran D (2004) Use of Pap test among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural setting. Prev Med 38:713–722PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD (2003) Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med 37:475–484PubMedCrossRef Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD (2003) Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med 37:475–484PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorin SS, Heck JE (2005) Cancer screening among Latino subgroups in the United States. Prev Med 40:515–526PubMedCrossRef Gorin SS, Heck JE (2005) Cancer screening among Latino subgroups in the United States. Prev Med 40:515–526PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta GD, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2006) Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 106:664–669PubMedCrossRef Datta GD, Colditz GA, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2006) Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 106:664–669PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor SE, Bryant HE (2005) Predictors of colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of men and women. Can J Gastroenterol 19:343–349PubMed McGregor SE, Bryant HE (2005) Predictors of colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of men and women. Can J Gastroenterol 19:343–349PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Coughlin SS, King J, Richards TB, Ekwueme DU (2006) Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:2154–2159PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, King J, Richards TB, Ekwueme DU (2006) Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:2154–2159PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study
verfasst von
Mary Catherine Schumacher
Martha L. Slattery
Anne P. Lanier
Khe-Ni Ma
Sandra Edwards
Elizabeth D. Ferucci
Lillian Tom-Orme
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2008
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 7/2008
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9135-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2008

Cancer Causes & Control 7/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.