nach oben

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Erschienen in:

01.12.2006 | Original Research

Spiritual Coping, Family History, and Perceived Risk for Breast Cancer—Can We Make Sense of it?

verfasst von: John M. Quillin, Donna K. McClish, Resa M. Jones, Karen Burruss, Joann N. Bodurtha

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 6/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Differences in spiritual beliefs and practices could influence perceptions of the role of genetic risk factors on personal cancer risk. We explored spiritual coping and breast cancer risk perceptions among women with and without a reported family history of breast cancer. Analyses were conducted on data from 899 women in primary care clinics who did not have breast cancer. Structural equation modeling (SEM), linear, and logistic modeling tested an interaction of family history of breast cancer on the relationship between spiritual coping and risk perceptions. Overall analyses demonstrated an inverse relationship between spiritual coping and breast cancer risk perceptions and a modifying effect of family history. More frequent spiritual coping was associated with lower risk perceptions for women with positive family histories, but not for those with negative family histories. Results support further research in this area that could influence communication of risk information to cancer genetic counseling patients.

Armstrong, K., Micco, E., Carney, A., Stopfer, J., & Putt, M. (2005). Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA, 293(14), 1729–1736.PubMedCrossRef

Audrain-McGovern, J., Hughes, C., & Patterson, F. (2003). Effecting behavior change: Awareness of family history. Am J Prev Med, 24(2), 183–189.PubMedCrossRef

Aukst-Margetic, B., Jakovljevic, M., Margetic, B., Biscan, M., & Samija, M. (2005). Religiosity, depression and pain in patients with breast cancer. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 27(4), 250–255.PubMedCrossRef

Baldacchino, D., & Draper, P. (2001). Spiritual coping strategies: A review of the nursing research literature. J Adv Nurs, 34(6), 833–841.PubMedCrossRef

Beckendorf, J. L., Callanan, N. P., Grobstein, R., Schmerler, S., & Fitzgerald, K. T. (1992). An explication of the national society of genetic counselors (NSGC) code of ethics. J Genet Counsel, 1(1), 31–39.CrossRef

Ben-Zur, H., Gilbar, O., & Lev, S. (2001). Coping with breast cancer: Patient, spouse, and dyad models. Psychosom Med, 63(1), 32–39.PubMed

Berry, D. (2005). Methodological pitfalls in the study of religiosity and spirituality. West J Nurs Res, 27(5), 628–647.PubMedCrossRef

Cameron, L. D. (2003). Conceptualizing and assessing risk perceptions: A self-regulatory perspective. In Conceptualizing and measuring risk perceptions workshop (1–12). Washington, DC.

Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med, 4(1), 92–100.PubMedCrossRef

Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M. F., & Robinson, D. S., et al. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol, 65(2), 375–390.PubMedCrossRef

Culver, J. L., Arena, P. L., Antoni, M. H., & Carver, C. S. (2002). Coping and distress among women under treatment for early stage breast cancer: Comparing African Americans, Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. Psycho-Oncology, 11(6), 495–504.PubMedCrossRef

Claus, E. B., Risch, N., & Thompson, W. D. (1994). Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. implications for risk prediction. Cancer, 73(3), 643–651.PubMedCrossRef

Dessio, W., Wade, C., Chao, M., Kronenberg, F., Cushman, L. E., & Kalmuss, D. (2004). Religion, spirituality, and healthcare choices of African-American women: Results of a national survey. Ethnicity & Disease, 14(2), 189– 197.

Donovan, K. A., & Tucker, D. C. (2000). Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample. J Behav Med, 23(1), 15–36.PubMedCrossRef

Duncan, V. J., Parrott, R. L., & Silk, K. J. (2001). African american Women’s perceptions of the role of genetics in breast cancer risk. Am J Health Stud, 17(2), 50–58.

Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Struct Equation Model, 8(1), 128–141.CrossRef

Felix Aaron, K., Levine, D., & Burstin, H. R. (2003). African American church participation and health care practices. J Gen Intern Med: Off J Soc Res Educ Prim Care Intern Med, 18(11), 908–913.

Fischoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Quadrel, M. J. (2004). Risk perception and communication. In R. Detels, J. McEwen, R. Beaglehole & H. Tanaka (Eds.), Oxford textbook of public health, 4th edn. (pp. 1105–1123). New York: Oxford University Press.

Fontaine, K. R., & Smith, S. (1995). Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: A cross-national study. Psychol Rep, 77(1), 143–146.PubMed

Furr, L. A., & Seger, R. E. (1998). Psychosocial predictors of interest in prenatal genetic screening. Psychol Rep, 82(1), 235–244.PubMedCrossRef

Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M., & Rimer, B. K. (1997). Health behavior and health education, 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Haas, J. S., Kaplan, C. P., Des Jarlais, G., Gildengoin, V., Perez-Stable, E. J., & Kerlikowske, K. (2005). Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at average and increased risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 14(9), 845–851.CrossRef

Holt, C. L., Clark, E. M., Kreuter, M. W., & Rubio, D. M. (2003). Spiritual health locus of control and breast cancer beliefs among urban African American women. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol, Am Psychol Assoc, 22(3), 294– 299.

Hughes, C., Gomez-Caminero, A., Benkendorf, J., Kerner, J., Isaacs, C., & Barter, J., et al. (1997). Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. Patient Educ Counsel, 32(1–2), 51–62.CrossRef

Johnson, K. S., Elbert-Avila, K. I., & Tulsky, J. A. (2005). The influence of spiritual beliefs and practices on the treatment preferences of african americans: A review of the literature. J Am Geriatr Soc, 53(4), 711–719.PubMedCrossRef

Katapodi, M. C, Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., & Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev Med, 38(4), 388–402.PubMedCrossRef

Kilpatrick, S. D., Weaver, A. J., McCullough, M. E., Puchalski, C., Larson, D. B., & Hays, J. C., et al. (2005). A review of spiritual and religious measures in nursing research journals: 1995–1999. J Religion & Health, 44(1), 55–66.CrossRef

Kinney, A. Y., Croyle, R. T., Dudley, W. N., Bailey, C. A., Pelias, M. K., & Neuhausen, S. L. (2001). Knowledge, attitudes, and interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: A survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Prev Med, 33(6), 543–551.PubMedCrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. New York: The Guilford Press.

Koenig, H. G. (1997). Is religion good for your health? the effects of religion on physical and mental health. New York: Haworth Pastoral Press.

Koenig, H. G. (2004). Religion, spirituality, and medicine: Research findings and implications for clinical practice. South Med J, 97(12), 1194–1200.PubMedCrossRef

Kriege, M., Brekelmans, C. T., Boetes, C., Besnard, P. E. Zonderland, H. M., & Obdeijn, I. M., et al. (2004). Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. The New Engl J Med, 351(5), 427–437.CrossRef

Larson, D. B., & Larson, S. B. (2003). Spirituality’s potential relevance to physical and emotional health: A brief review of quantitative research. J Psychol Theol, 31(1), 37–52.

Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Struct Equation Model, 12(1), 1–27.CrossRef

Leonard, B. J., & Plotnikoff, G. A. (2000). Awareness: The heart of cultural competence. AACN Clin Issues, 11(1), 51– 59.PubMedCrossRef

Moberg, D. O. (2005). Research in spirituality, religion and aging. J Gerontol Soc Work, 45(1–2), 11–40.PubMedCrossRef

Osei, E. K., Amoh, G. E., & Schandorf, C. (1997). Risk ranking by perception. Health Phys, 72(2), 195–203.PubMedCrossRef

Pargament, K. I., Ensing, D. S., Falgout, K., Olsen, H., Reilly, B., & Van Haitsma, K., et al. (1990). God help me: Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events. Am J Comm Psychol, 18(6), 793– 824.CrossRef

Parrott, R., Silk, K., Raup Krieger, J., Harris, T., & Condit, C. (2004). Behavioral health outcomes associated with religious faith and media exposure about human genetics. Health Commun, 16(1), 29–45.PubMedCrossRef

Patenaude, A. F. (2005). Genetic testing for cancer: Psychological approaches to helping patients and families, 1st edn. Washington, D. C. : APA Books.CrossRef

Powe, B. D. (1997). Cancer fatalism - spiritual perspectives. J Religion and Health, 36(2), 135–144.CrossRef

Powe, B. D., & Finnie, R. (2003). Cancer fatalism: The state of the science. Cancer Nurs, 26(6), 454–465; 466–677.PubMed

Quillin, J. M., Fries, E., McClish, D., Shaw de Paredes, E., & Bodurtha, J. (2004). Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions. J Behav Med, 27(2), 205–214.PubMedCrossRef

Reynolds, P. P., Kamei, R. K., Sundquist, J., Khanna, N., Palmer, E. J., & Palmer, T. (2005). Using the PRACTICE mnemonic to apply cultural competency to genetics in medical education and patient care. Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Coll, 80(12), 1107–1113.

Robb, K. A., Miles, A., & Wardle, J. (2004). Demographic and psychosocial factors associated with perceived risk for colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomarkers & Prev: A Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 13(3), 366–372.

Salsman, J. M., Brown, T. L., Brechting, E. H., & Carlson, C. R. (2005). The link between religion and spirituality and psychological adjustment: The mediating role of optimism and social support. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 31(4), 522–535.PubMedCrossRef

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods, 7(2), 147–177.PubMedCrossRef

Schneider, K. (2002). Counseling about cancer, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Schwartz, M. D., Hughes, C., Roth, J., Main, D. Peshkin, B. N., & Isaacs, C., et al. (2000). Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 9(4), 381–385.

Sherliker, L., & Steptoe, A. (2000). Coping with new treatments for cancer: A feasibility study of daily diary measures. Patient Educ Counsel, 40(1), 11–19.CrossRef

Sherman, A. C., Simonton, S., Adams, D. C., Vural, E., & Hanna, E. (2000). Coping with head and neck cancer during different phases of treatment. Head & Neck, 22(8), 787– 793.CrossRef

Sloan, R. P., & Bagiella, E. (2002). Claims about religious involvement and health outcomes. Ann Behav Med: A Publ Soc Behav Med, 24(1), 14–21.

Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., & Huggins, M. E. (2002). The first year after breast cancer diagnosis: Hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment. Psycho-Oncology, 11(2), 93–102.PubMedCrossRef

Stefanek, M., McDonald, P. G., & Hess, S. A. (2005). Religion, spirituality and cancer: Current status and methodological challenges. Psycho-Oncology, 14(6), 450–463.PubMedCrossRef

Taylor, E. J. (2005). Spiritual complementary therapies in cancer care. Semin Oncol Nurs, 21(3), 159–163.PubMedCrossRef

Thompson, I. (2002). Mental health and spiritual care. Nurs Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 17(9), 33–38.

Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., & Grumet, S. C., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: Recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Counsel, 13(2), 83–114.CrossRef

Vernon, S. W., Gritz, E. R., Peterson, S. K., Perz, C. A., Marani, S., & Amos, C. I., et al. (1999). Intention to learn results of genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: A Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 8(4 Pt 2), 353–360.

Walter, F. M., Emery, J., Braithwaite, D., & Marteau, T. M. (2004). Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Ann Fam Med, 2(6), 583–594.PubMedCrossRef

Wang, V. O. (2001). Multicultural genetic counseling: Then, now, and in the 21st century. Am J Med Genet, 106(3), 208–215.PubMedCrossRef

Weil, J. (2001). Multicultural education and genetic counseling. Clin Genet, 59(3), 143–149.PubMedCrossRef

Weinstein, N. D. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. J Behav Med, 5(4), 441–460.PubMedCrossRef

Windschitl, P. D. (2003). Measuring and conceptualizing perceptions of Vulnerability/Likelihood. In Conceptualizing and measuring risk perceptions workshop (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC.

Yoon, P. W., Scheuner, M. T., Gwinn, M., Khoury, M. J., Jorgensen, C., & Hariri, S., et al. (2004). Awareness of family health history as a risk factor for disease – United States, 2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 53(44), 1044–1047.

Titel: Spiritual Coping, Family History, and Perceived Risk for Breast Cancer—Can We Make Sense of it?
verfasst von: John M. Quillin
Donna K. McClish
Resa M. Jones
Karen Burruss
Joann N. Bodurtha
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2006
Verlag: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9037-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

21.05.2024 Krebsvorsorge in der Gynäkologie Nachrichten

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

15.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen mit lokalem oder metastasiertem Brustkrebs, die Statine einnehmen, haben eine niedrigere krebsspezifische Mortalität als Patientinnen, die dies nicht tun, legen neue Daten aus den USA nahe.

S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Spiritual Coping, Family History, and Perceived Risk for Breast Cancer—Can We Make Sense of it?

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

Update Gynäkologie

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2006

Why Me? Why Not Me?

A Survey of Patients’ Experiences with the Cancer Genetic Counseling Process: Recommendations for Cancer Genetics Programs

Ethical Issues in Cancer Genetics: 1) Whose Information Is It?

If We Build It … Will They Come? – Establishing a Cancer Genetics Services Clinic for an Underserved Predominantly Latina Cohort

Editorial Introduction: Genetic Counseling Challenges in Cancer

The Complexity and Challenges of Genetic Counseling and Testing for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

Update Gynäkologie