Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 2/2016

01.04.2016 | Original Paper

Islam, Assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath

verfasst von: Marcia C. Inhorn, Soraya Tremayne

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), including in vitro fertilization to overcome infertility, are now widely available across the Middle East. Islamic fatwas emerging from the Sunni Islamic countries have permitted many ARTs, while prohibiting others. However, recent religious rulings emanating from Shia Muslim-dominant Iran have created unique avenues for infertile Muslim couples to obtain donor gametes through third-party reproductive assistance. The opening of Iran to gamete donation has had major impacts in Shia-dominant Lebanon and has led to so-called reproductive tourism of Sunni Muslim couples who are searching for donor gametes across national and international borders. This paper explores the “bioethical aftermath” of donor technologies in the Muslim Middle East. Other unexpected outcomes include new forms of sex selection and fetal “reduction.” In general, assisted reproduction in the Muslim world has been a key site for understanding how emerging biomedical technologies are generating new Islamic bioethical discourses and local moral responses, as ARTs are used in novel and unexpected ways.
Fußnoten
1
Although a fatwa is non-legally binding, it is generally regarded as an authoritative Islamic religious decree, offered by an Islamic cleric who is considered to be an expert in Islamic jurisprudence.
 
2
The possible exception is Mali, where at least one IVF clinic is performing third-party reproductive assistance (Horbst 2015).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Inhorn, M. C., Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B., & Toloo, G. (2008). The “Iranian ART Revolution”: Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and third-party donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 4, 1–28.CrossRef Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Inhorn, M. C., Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B., & Toloo, G. (2008). The “Iranian ART Revolution”: Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and third-party donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 4, 1–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Torki, S. (1980). Milk kinship in Arabic society: An unexplored problem in the ethnography of marriage. Ethnology, 19(2), 233–244.CrossRef Al-Torki, S. (1980). Milk kinship in Arabic society: An unexplored problem in the ethnography of marriage. Ethnology, 19(2), 233–244.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Behnam, J. (1973). The social structures of family in Iran. Tehran: Tehran University Press. Behnam, J. (1973). The social structures of family in Iran. Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Blyth, E., & Landau, T. (Eds.). (2004). Third party assisted conception across cultures: Social, legal, and ethical perspectives. London: Routledge. Blyth, E., & Landau, T. (Eds.). (2004). Third party assisted conception across cultures: Social, legal, and ethical perspectives. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and new kinship: Reproductive technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books. Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and new kinship: Reproductive technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef Franklin, S. (2007). Dolly mixtures: The remaking of genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge. Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C. (2006). “He won’t be my son”: Middle Eastern Muslim men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120.CrossRefPubMed Inhorn, M. C. (2006). “He won’t be my son”: Middle Eastern Muslim men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab man: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab man: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C. (2015). Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF sojourns in global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef Inhorn, M. C. (2015). Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF sojourns in global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2015). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies, and global movements in the 21st century. Human Reproduction Update,. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv016.PubMed Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2015). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies, and global movements in the 21st century. Human Reproduction Update,. doi:10.​1093/​humupd/​dmv016.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (Eds.). (2012). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn. Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (Eds.). (2012). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatib-Chahidi, J. (1992). Milk kinship in shi’ite Islamic Iran. In V. Maher (Ed.), The anthropology of breastfeeding: Natural law or social construct. Oxford: Berg. Khatib-Chahidi, J. (1992). Milk kinship in shi’ite Islamic Iran. In V. Maher (Ed.), The anthropology of breastfeeding: Natural law or social construct. Oxford: Berg.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotfalian, M. (2004). Islam, technoscientific identities, and the culture of curiosity. Washington, DC: University Press of America. Lotfalian, M. (2004). Islam, technoscientific identities, and the culture of curiosity. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Zurück zum Zitat Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1998). Marriage on trial: A study of Islamic family law. London: I.B. Tauris. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1998). Marriage on trial: A study of Islamic family law. London: I.B. Tauris.
Zurück zum Zitat Moosa, E. (2003). Human cloning in Muslim ethics (pp. 23–26). Fall: Voices Across Boundaries. Moosa, E. (2003). Human cloning in Muslim ethics (pp. 23–26). Fall: Voices Across Boundaries.
Zurück zum Zitat Saniei, M. (2012). Human embryonic stem cell research in Iran: the significance of the Islamic context. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn. Saniei, M. (2012). Human embryonic stem cell research in Iran: the significance of the Islamic context. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn.
Zurück zum Zitat Serour, G. I. (2008). Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 17(Suppl. 3), 34–38.CrossRefPubMed Serour, G. I. (2008). Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 17(Suppl. 3), 34–38.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tremayne, S. (2009). Law, ethics, and donor technologies in Shia Iran. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & M. C. Inhorn (Eds.), Assisting reproduction, testing genes: Global encounters with new biotechnologies. New York: Berghahn. Tremayne, S. (2009). Law, ethics, and donor technologies in Shia Iran. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & M. C. Inhorn (Eds.), Assisting reproduction, testing genes: Global encounters with new biotechnologies. New York: Berghahn.
Zurück zum Zitat Tremayne, S. (2012). The “down side” of gamete donation: challenging “happy family” rhetoric in Iran. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn. Tremayne, S. (2012). The “down side” of gamete donation: challenging “happy family” rhetoric in Iran. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. New York: Berghahn.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, R. (1978). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Williams, R. (1978). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Horbst, V. (2015). You cannot do IVF in Africa as in Europe: The cases of Mali and Uganda. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society (submitted). Horbst, V. (2015). You cannot do IVF in Africa as in Europe: The cases of Mali and Uganda. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society (submitted).
Metadaten
Titel
Islam, Assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath
verfasst von
Marcia C. Inhorn
Soraya Tremayne
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Religion and Health 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe