Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 10/2021

07.05.2021 | Review Paper

Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Emily Gaskin, Kim Weber Yorga, Rebecca Berman, Mandy Allison, Jeanelle Sheeder

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 10/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To describe characteristics and outcomes of Group Well-Child Care programs and provide recommendations for future research.

Methods

Informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an electronic references database, manual search of bibliographies and peer-reviewed journals, and general Internet search were conducted including research published up to July 2019. English language, peer-reviewed research, with provision of medical care were included. Studies without published outcomes, not specific to well-child care, or included only one visit were excluded. Nineteen articles met review criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black tool for rigor.

Results

Programs typically included an individual medical examination, check-in, and group discussion. Demographics varied by race, ethnicity, age, income level, education and parity, though many were used specifically with underserved populations. Group size ranged from 3 to 10 and lasted an average of 1.5 h over a period of 6–24 months. Evidence suggests group well-child care is as effective as individual care with improvement noted for health-care utilization, weight outcomes, and more content covered. Design elements such as patient-led discussion, self-check-in, inclusion of other family members, and use of a variety of health care professionals and para-professionals may influence these outcomes.

Conclusions

Group well-child care is useful in providing efficient and patient-centered care and shows promise for use in underserved populations. Future research should utilize more rigorous study design and include evaluations of program components and group processes to address implementation challenges and determine effectiveness.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barker, K. (2003). Birthing and bureaucratic women: Needs talk and the definitional legacy of the Sheppard-Towner Act. Feminist Studies, 29(2), 333–355. Barker, K. (2003). Birthing and bureaucratic women: Needs talk and the definitional legacy of the Sheppard-Towner Act. Feminist Studies, 29(2), 333–355.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodds, M., Nicholson, L., Muse, B., 3rd., & Osborn, L. M. (1993). Group health supervision visits more effective than individual visits in delivering health care information. Pediatrics, 91(3), 668–670.PubMed Dodds, M., Nicholson, L., Muse, B., 3rd., & Osborn, L. M. (1993). Group health supervision visits more effective than individual visits in delivering health care information. Pediatrics, 91(3), 668–670.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(6), 377–384.CrossRef Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(6), 377–384.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, M. (1974). Careofthewell child:cluster visits. American Journal of Nursing, 74(8), 1485–1488. Feldman, M. (1974). Careofthewell child:cluster visits. American Journal of Nursing, 74(8), 1485–1488.
Zurück zum Zitat Massey, Z., Rising, S. S., & Ickovics, J. (2006). CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care: Promoting relationship-centered care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35(2), 286–294.CrossRef Massey, Z., Rising, S. S., & Ickovics, J. (2006). CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care: Promoting relationship-centered care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35(2), 286–294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal, P. (2011). Centering parenting: pilot implementation of a group model for teaching family medicine residents well-child care. Permanente Journal, 15(4), 40–41.CrossRef Mittal, P. (2011). Centering parenting: pilot implementation of a group model for teaching family medicine residents well-child care. Permanente Journal, 15(4), 40–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osborn, L. M. (1989). Group well-child care offers unique opportunities for patient education. Patient Education and Counseling, 14(3), 227–234.CrossRef Osborn, L. M. (1989). Group well-child care offers unique opportunities for patient education. Patient Education and Counseling, 14(3), 227–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osborn, L. M., & Woolley, F. R. (1981). Use of groups in well child care. Pediatrics, 67(5), 701–706.PubMed Osborn, L. M., & Woolley, F. R. (1981). Use of groups in well child care. Pediatrics, 67(5), 701–706.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Page, C., Reid, A., Andrews, L., & Steiner, J. (2013). Evaluation of prenatal and pediatric group visits in a residency training program. Family Medicine, 45(5), 349–353.PubMed Page, C., Reid, A., Andrews, L., & Steiner, J. (2013). Evaluation of prenatal and pediatric group visits in a residency training program. Family Medicine, 45(5), 349–353.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Page, C., Reid, A., Hoagland, E., & Leonard, S. B. (2010). WellBabies: Mothers’ perspectives on an innovative model of group well-child care. Family Medicine, 42(3), 202–207.PubMed Page, C., Reid, A., Hoagland, E., & Leonard, S. B. (2010). WellBabies: Mothers’ perspectives on an innovative model of group well-child care. Family Medicine, 42(3), 202–207.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, J. A., Davis, R. L., & Kemper, K. J. (1997a). Healthcareutilizationandhealthstatusinhigh-riskchildrenrandomized to receive groupor individualwellchildcare. Pediatrics, 100(3), E1.CrossRef Taylor, J. A., Davis, R. L., & Kemper, K. J. (1997a). Healthcareutilizationandhealthstatusinhigh-riskchildrenrandomized to receive groupor individualwellchildcare. Pediatrics, 100(3), E1.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, J. A., Davis, R. L., & Kemper, K. J. (1997b). A randomized controlled trial of group versus individual well child care for high-risk children: Maternal-child interaction and developmental outcomes. Pediatrics, 99(6), E9.CrossRef Taylor, J. A., Davis, R. L., & Kemper, K. J. (1997b). A randomized controlled trial of group versus individual well child care for high-risk children: Maternal-child interaction and developmental outcomes. Pediatrics, 99(6), E9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, J. A., & Kemper, K. J. (1998). Group well-child care for high-risk families: maternal outcomes. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152(6), 579–584.CrossRef Taylor, J. A., & Kemper, K. J. (1998). Group well-child care for high-risk families: maternal outcomes. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152(6), 579–584.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pediatric Group Care: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Emily Gaskin
Kim Weber Yorga
Rebecca Berman
Mandy Allison
Jeanelle Sheeder
Publikationsdatum
07.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 10/2021
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03170-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2021

Maternal and Child Health Journal 10/2021 Zur Ausgabe