Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Prevention Science 7/2015

01.10.2015 | Commentary

Small Sample Research: Considerations Beyond Statistical Power

verfasst von: Kathleen E. Etz, Judith A. Arroyo

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Small sample research presents a challenge to current standards of design and analytic approaches and the underlying notions of what constitutes good prevention science. Yet, small sample research is critically important as the research questions posed in small samples often represent serious health concerns in vulnerable and underrepresented populations. This commentary considers the Special Section on small sample research and also highlights additional challenges that arise in small sample research not considered in the Special Section, including generalizability, determining what constitutes knowledge, and ensuring that research designs match community desires. It also points to opportunities afforded by small sample research, such as a focus on and increased understanding of context and the emphasis it may place on alternatives to the randomized clinical trial. The commentary urges the development and adoption of innovative strategies to conduct research with small samples.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.CrossRef Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen, J., Mohatt, G. V., Fok, C. C. T., Henry, D., Burkett, R., & People Awakening Project. (2014). A protective factors model for alcohol abuse and suicide prevention among Alaska Native youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 125–139.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Allen, J., Mohatt, G. V., Fok, C. C. T., Henry, D., Burkett, R., & People Awakening Project. (2014). A protective factors model for alcohol abuse and suicide prevention among Alaska Native youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 125–139.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Atkins, M. S., Frazier, S. L., & Cappella, E. (2006). Hybrid research models: Natural opportunities for examining mental health in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 105–108. Atkins, M. S., Frazier, S. L., & Cappella, E. (2006). Hybrid research models: Natural opportunities for examining mental health in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 105–108.
Zurück zum Zitat Beeker, C., Guenther-Grey, C., & Raj, A. (1998). Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 831–842.CrossRef Beeker, C., Guenther-Grey, C., & Raj, A. (1998). Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 831–842.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fok, Henry, D., Allen, J. (2015). Maybe small is too small a term: Introduction to advancing small sample prevention science. Prevention Science. Fok, Henry, D., Allen, J. (2015). Maybe small is too small a term: Introduction to advancing small sample prevention science. Prevention Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2008). Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 216–221.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Frohlich, K. L., & Potvin, L. (2008). Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 216–221.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gone, J. P. (2012). Indigenous traditional knowledge and substance abuse treatment outcomes: The problem of efficacy evaluation. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38, 493–497.CrossRefPubMed Gone, J. P. (2012). Indigenous traditional knowledge and substance abuse treatment outcomes: The problem of efficacy evaluation. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38, 493–497.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Green, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 126–153.CrossRef Green, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 126–153.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hawe, P. (1994). Capturing the meaning of “community” in community intervention evaluation: Some contributions from community psychology. Health Promotion International, 9, 199–210.CrossRef Hawe, P. (1994). Capturing the meaning of “community” in community intervention evaluation: Some contributions from community psychology. Health Promotion International, 9, 199–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henry, D., Dymnicki, A. B., Mohatt, N., Kelly, J. G., & Allen, J. (2015a). Clustering methods with qualitative data: A mixed methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0561-z. Henry, D., Dymnicki, A. B., Mohatt, N., Kelly, J. G., & Allen, J. (2015a). Clustering methods with qualitative data: A mixed methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevention Science. doi:10.​1007/​s11121-015-0561-z.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry, D., Fok, C.C.T., Allen, J. (2015). Why small is too small a term: Prevention science for health disparities, culturally distinct groups, and community-level intervention. Prevention Science. Henry, D., Fok, C.C.T., Allen, J. (2015). Why small is too small a term: Prevention science for health disparities, culturally distinct groups, and community-level intervention. Prevention Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivasan, S., Moser, R. P., Willis, G., Riley, W., Alexander, M., Berrigan, D., & Kobrin, S. (2015). Small is essential: Importance of subpopulation research in cancer control. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 371–373.CrossRef Srinivasan, S., Moser, R. P., Willis, G., Riley, W., Alexander, M., Berrigan, D., & Kobrin, S. (2015). Small is essential: Importance of subpopulation research in cancer control. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 371–373.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trickett, E. J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L. W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., Miller, R. L., Rapkin, B. D., Schensul, J. J., Schulz, A. J., & Trimble, J. E. (2011). Advancing the science of community-level interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 11, 1410–1419.CrossRef Trickett, E. J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L. W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., Miller, R. L., Rapkin, B. D., Schensul, J. J., Schulz, A. J., & Trimble, J. E. (2011). Advancing the science of community-level interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 11, 1410–1419.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Small Sample Research: Considerations Beyond Statistical Power
verfasst von
Kathleen E. Etz
Judith A. Arroyo
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Prevention Science / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0585-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Prevention Science 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe