Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 3/2014

01.04.2014

Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese

verfasst von: Suemy Cioffi Izu, Eduardo Macoto Kosugi, Alessandra Stanquini Lopes, Karen Vitols Brandão, Leonardo Bomediano Garcia Sousa, Vinícius Magalhães Suguri, Luis Carlos Gregório

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to validate the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese.

Method

A prospective study was conducted with ROE administration to 56 patients submitted to rhinoplasty (preoperatively, and then 15-day and 90-day postoperatively) and 100 volunteers without the need or desire of cosmetic or functional nasal surgery. Reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility), validity, responsiveness and clinical interpretability were assessed.

Results

Rhinoplasty patients’ mean preoperative score was 7.14, 15 days post-op 17.73 and 90 days post-op 20.50, while controls presented 17.94 points (p < 0.0001), showing the questionnaire’s validity and responsiveness. Internal consistency was 0.86. Inter- and intra-examiner test–retest reproducibility was 0.90 and 0.94, respectively. The effect size caused by the surgery was considered large (15 days post-op compared to the preoperative score: effect size = 3.22; 90 days post-op compared to preoperative score: effect size = 4.06). The minimally important difference was 8.67 points, so changes smaller than 9 points in ROE might not be perceived by the patient as an improvement or worsening.

Conclusion

The Brazilian Portuguese version of ROE is a valid instrument to assess results in rhinoplasty patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Moolenburgh, S. E., Mureau, M. A., & Hofer, S. O. (2008). Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: Patient versus panel perception. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 61(12), 1459–1464.CrossRef Moolenburgh, S. E., Mureau, M. A., & Hofer, S. O. (2008). Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: Patient versus panel perception. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 61(12), 1459–1464.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsarraf, R. (2000). Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 23(3), 192–197.CrossRef Alsarraf, R. (2000). Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 23(3), 192–197.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins, C. (2009). Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. Rhinology, 47(1), 10–17.PubMed Hopkins, C. (2009). Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. Rhinology, 47(1), 10–17.PubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.CrossRef The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsarraf, R., Larrabee, W. F., Anderson, S., Murakami, C. S., & Johnson, C. S, Jr. (2001). Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: A pilot study. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 3(3), 198–201.PubMedCrossRef Alsarraf, R., Larrabee, W. F., Anderson, S., Murakami, C. S., & Johnson, C. S, Jr. (2001). Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: A pilot study. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 3(3), 198–201.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Izu, S. C., Kosugi, E. M., Brandão, K. V., Lopes, A. S., Garcia, L. B., Suguri, V. M., et al. (2012). Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 78(4), 76–79.PubMedCrossRef Izu, S. C., Kosugi, E. M., Brandão, K. V., Lopes, A. S., Garcia, L. B., Suguri, V. M., et al. (2012). Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 78(4), 76–79.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRef Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosugi, E. M., Chen, V. G., Fonseca, V. M., Cursino, M. M., Mendes-Neto, J. A., & Gregório, L. C. (2011). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT): 22 to Brazilian Portuguese. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77(5), 663–669.PubMedCrossRef Kosugi, E. M., Chen, V. G., Fonseca, V. M., Cursino, M. M., Mendes-Neto, J. A., & Gregório, L. C. (2011). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT): 22 to Brazilian Portuguese. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77(5), 663–669.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins, C., Gillett, S., Slack, R., Lund, V. J., & Browne, J. P. (2009). Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clinical Otolaryngology, 34(5), 447–454.PubMedCrossRef Hopkins, C., Gillett, S., Slack, R., Lund, V. J., & Browne, J. P. (2009). Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clinical Otolaryngology, 34(5), 447–454.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments : Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205.CrossRef Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments : Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193–205.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415.PubMedCrossRef Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Klatchoian, D. A., Len, C. A., Terreri, M. T., Silva, M., Itamoto, C. H., Ciconelli, R. M., et al. (2008). Quality of life of children and adolescents from São Paulo: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Jornal de Pediatria, 84(4), 308–315.PubMedCrossRef Klatchoian, D. A., Len, C. A., Terreri, M. T., Silva, M., Itamoto, C. H., Ciconelli, R. M., et al. (2008). Quality of life of children and adolescents from São Paulo: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Jornal de Pediatria, 84(4), 308–315.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fonseca, E. S., Camargo, A. L., Castro, R. A., Sartori, M. G., Fonseca, M. C., Lima, G. R., et al. (2005). Validation of a quality of life questionnaire (King′s Health Questionnaire) in Brazilian women with urinary incontinence. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 27(5), 235–242.CrossRef Fonseca, E. S., Camargo, A. L., Castro, R. A., Sartori, M. G., Fonseca, M. C., Lima, G. R., et al. (2005). Validation of a quality of life questionnaire (King′s Health Questionnaire) in Brazilian women with urinary incontinence. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 27(5), 235–242.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberger, M., Oddone, E. Z., Samsa, G. P., & Landsman, P. B. (1996). Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(2), 135–140.PubMedCrossRef Weinberger, M., Oddone, E. Z., Samsa, G. P., & Landsman, P. B. (1996). Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(2), 135–140.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 27(3), 281–291.CrossRef Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 27(3), 281–291.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton, C. J., Watkins, C. L., Cook, N., Leathley, M. J., McAdam, J., & Dey, P. (2013). Postal and face-to-face administration of stroke outcome measures: Can mixed modes be used? Stroke, 44(1), 217–219.PubMedCrossRef Sutton, C. J., Watkins, C. L., Cook, N., Leathley, M. J., McAdam, J., & Dey, P. (2013). Postal and face-to-face administration of stroke outcome measures: Can mixed modes be used? Stroke, 44(1), 217–219.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellings, P. W., & Nolst Trenité, G. J. (2007). Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope, 117(6), 985–989.PubMedCrossRef Hellings, P. W., & Nolst Trenité, G. J. (2007). Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope, 117(6), 985–989.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Arima, L. M., Velasco, L. C., & Tiago, R. S. (2012). Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: A preliminary study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 36(2), 248–253.PubMedCrossRef Arima, L. M., Velasco, L. C., & Tiago, R. S. (2012). Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: A preliminary study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 36(2), 248–253.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Faidiga, G. B., Carenzi, L. R., Yassuda, C. C., Silveira, F., Lago, T. D., Leite, M. G., et al. (2010). Long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76(4), 437–441.PubMedCrossRef Faidiga, G. B., Carenzi, L. R., Yassuda, C. C., Silveira, F., Lago, T. D., Leite, M. G., et al. (2010). Long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76(4), 437–441.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Meningaud, J. P., Lantieri, L., & Bertrand, J. C. (2008). Rhinoplasty: An outcome research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 121(1), 251–257.PubMedCrossRef Meningaud, J. P., Lantieri, L., & Bertrand, J. C. (2008). Rhinoplasty: An outcome research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 121(1), 251–257.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Arima, L. M., Velasco, L. C., & Tiago, R. S. (2011). Crooked nose: Outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77(4), 510–515.PubMedCrossRef Arima, L. M., Velasco, L. C., & Tiago, R. S. (2011). Crooked nose: Outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77(4), 510–515.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese
verfasst von
Suemy Cioffi Izu
Eduardo Macoto Kosugi
Alessandra Stanquini Lopes
Karen Vitols Brandão
Leonardo Bomediano Garcia Sousa
Vinícius Magalhães Suguri
Luis Carlos Gregório
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0539-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Quality of Life Research 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe