nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

05.04.2021

COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures

verfasst von: Joel J. Gagnier, Jianyu Lai, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Caroline B. Terwee

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a set of consensus and empirically based reporting recommendations for primary studies of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

This study included four phases: 1. Conducting an extensive literature review of recommendations for reporting of studies testing measurement properties of PROMs; 2. Preparing for the Delphi study by identifying experts; 3. Conducting three Delphi rounds aiming for consensus on the item list of recommendations found in phase 1; 4. Developing the COSMIN reporting guideline and user manual.

Results

The literature review resulted in 93 reporting items, included in the first Delphi round. A total of 84 individuals (from 12 countries) agreed to participate in the Delphi study, with 47, 30 and 25 responding in rounds one, two and three, respectively. After three rounds, we achieved consensus on a set of 71 items separated into a set of 35 "common" items (relevant to all studies on measurement properties) and 41 "specific" items (exclusively relevant to one of the nine measurement properties).

Conclusion

Consensus was achieved on a set of 71 items for inclusion in a reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of PROMs. These items will guide researchers on the necessary information to include in their reports of investigations of measurement properties of PROMs. This guideline will likely improve the completeness of reporting of these important studies.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., & for the CONSORT PRO Group. (2013). Reporting of patient reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO Extension. JAMA., 309(8), 814–22.CrossRef

FDA Guidance on Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) (2015) http://www.ispor.org/workpaper/FDA%20PRO%20Guidance.pdf. Accessed Oct 15, 2015.

Basch, E. (2010). The missing voice of patients in drug safety reporting. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(10), 865–869.CrossRef

Lipscomb, J., Reeve, B. B., Clauser, S. B., Abrams, J. S., Burke, L. B., Denicoff, A. M., et al. (2007). Patient reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(32), 5133–5140.CrossRef

Sanders, C., Egger, M., Donovan, J., Tallon, D., & Frankel, S. (1998). Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: Bibliographic study. BMJ, 317, 1191–1194.CrossRef

Soreide, K., & Soreide, A. H. (2013). Using patient reported outcome measures for improved decision making in patients with gastrointestinal cancer- the last clinical frontier in surgical oncology? Frontiers in Oncology., 3, 157.CrossRef

Bryan, S., Whitehurst, D. Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROMs) in British Columbia: What has been achieved so far and where next? Quality Forum 2013, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute.

Bylicki, O., Gan, H. K., Joly, F., Maillet, D., You, B., & Peron, J. (2014). Poor patient-reported outcomes reporting according to CONSORT guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systematic cancer therapy. Annals of Oncology, 26, 231–237.CrossRef

Brundage, M., Bass, B., Davidson, J., Queenan, J., Bezjak, A., Ringash, J., et al. (2011). Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers. Quality of Life Research, 20(5), 653–664.CrossRef

10.

Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Ricci Garotti, M. G., Suman, A., de Vet, H. C., & Mokkink, L. B. (2015). The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments. Qual Life Res., 25, 767–779.CrossRef

11.

Huang, S., Grant, J., Miller, B., Mirza, F. M., & Gagnier, J. J. (2015). A systematic review of psychometric properties of patient reported outcome instruments for use in patients with rotator cuff disease. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 2572–2582.CrossRef

12.

Gagnier, J. J. (2015). Patient reported outcome measures for rotator cuff disease, total knee and total hip arthroplasty: An evaluation of measurement properties. Invited oral presentation. Outcomes Special Interest Group: American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV.

13.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). How to make more published research true. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Mokkink, L. B., Cb, Terwee, Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi survey. Quality of Life Research, 19, 539–549.CrossRef

15.

Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905.CrossRef

16.

Prinsen, C. A., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., King-Jones, S., Ishaque, S., Bhaloo, Z., et al. (2014). Core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: Protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set.” Trials, 25(15), 247. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-247.CrossRef

17.

Kottner, J., Audigé, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajewski, B. J., Hróbjartsson, A., et al. (2011). Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 96–106.CrossRef

18.

Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Shulz, K. F., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., et al. (2010). Consolidated standards of reporting trials group. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guideline for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(8), 1–37.CrossRef

19.

Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., et al. (2014). STROBE initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observation studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. International Journal of Surgery, 12(12), 1500–24.CrossRef

20.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interview and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.CrossRef

21.

Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Reviski, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., & CONSORT PRO Group. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309, 814–822.CrossRef

22.

Calvert, M., Brundage, M., Jacobsen, P. B., Schunemann, H. J., & Efficace, F. (2013). The CONSORT patient-reported outcome (PRO) extension: Implications for clinical trials and practice. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 184.CrossRef

23.

Plint, A. C., Moher, D., Morrison, A., Schulz, K., Altman, D. G., Hill, C., et al. (2006). Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reported of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review. MJA, 185, 263–267.PubMed

24.

Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research., 27, 1147–57.CrossRef

25.

Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170.CrossRef

26.

Prinsen, C. A., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., et al. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449.CrossRef

27.

Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105–113.CrossRef

28.

Black, N., Murphy, M., Lamping, D., McKee, M., Sanderson, C., Askham, J., et al. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4(4), 236–248.CrossRef

29.

Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1171–1179.CrossRef

Titel: COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
verfasst von: Joel J. Gagnier
Jianyu Lai
Lidwine B. Mokkink
Caroline B. Terwee
Publikationsdatum: 05.04.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Association of frailty with quality of life in older hypertensive adults: a cross-sectional study

Gender differences in factors associated with low quality of life and depression in Korean patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Development and validation of a short version of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life questionnaire: the SF-SarQoL

Health-promoting behaviors mediate the relationship between eHealth literacy and health-related quality of life among Chinese older adults: a cross-sectional study

Health-related physical indicators and self-rated quality of life in older adults with neurocognitive disorder

Focus on disability-free life expectancy: implications for health-related quality of life