Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2010

01.05.2010 | Innovations in Education

Cancer Risk Communication with Low Health Literacy Patients: A Continuing Medical Education Program

verfasst von: Eboni G. Price-Haywood, MD, MPH, Katherine G. Roth, BA, Kit Shelby, Lisa A. Cooper, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Sonderheft 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy (HL) is an important risk factor for cancer health disparities.

OBJECTIVE

Describe a continuing medical education (CME) program to teach primary care physicians (PCP) cancer risk communication and shared decision-making (SDM) with low HL patients and baseline skills assessment.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial in five primary care clinics in New Orleans, LA.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen PCPs and 73 low HL patients overdue for cancer screening.

INTERVENTION

Primary care physicians completed unannounced standardized patient (SP) encounters at baseline. Intervention physicians received SP verbal feedback; academic detailing to review cancer screening guidelines, red flags for identifying low HL, and strategies for effective counseling; and web-based tutorial of SP comments and checklist items hyperlinked to reference articles/websites.

MAIN MEASURES

Baseline PCP self-rated proficiency, SP ratings of physician general cancer risk communication and SDM skills, patient perceived involvement in care.

RESULTS

Baseline assessments show physicians rated their proficiency in discussing cancer risks and eliciting patient preference for treatment/decision-making as “very good”. SPs rated physician exploration of perceived cancer susceptibility, screening barriers/motivators, checking understanding, explaining screening options and associated risks/benefits, and eliciting preferences for screening as “satisfactory”. Clinic patients rated their doctor’s facilitation of involvement in care and information exchange as “good”. However, they rated their participation in decision-making as “poor”.

DISCUSSION

The baseline skills assessment suggests a need for physician training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making for patients with low HL. We are determining the effectiveness of teaching methods, required resources and long-term feasibility for a CME program.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat DeWalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone M. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–39.CrossRefPubMed DeWalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone M. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–39.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–49.CrossRefPubMed Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–49.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E, Kripalani S. Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:782–6.CrossRefPubMed Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E, Kripalani S. Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:782–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mika VS, Kelly PJ, Price MA, Franquiz M, Villarreal R. The ABCs of health literacy. Fam Commun Health. 2005;28:351–7. Mika VS, Kelly PJ, Price MA, Franquiz M, Villarreal R. The ABCs of health literacy. Fam Commun Health. 2005;28:351–7.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23:433–5.PubMed Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23:433–5.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:161–79.CrossRefPubMed Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:161–79.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock JM. The Health Belief Model. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997:41–59. Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock JM. The Health Belief Model. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997:41–59.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.CrossRefPubMed Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990: 5(1):29–33. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990: 5(1):29–33.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, et al. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:83–90.CrossRefPubMed Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, et al. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:83–90.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Harrison RV, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared to observed measures of competence. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–102.CrossRefPubMed Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Harrison RV, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared to observed measures of competence. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–102.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank P, Friscella K, Shiedls CG, Meldrum SC, Duberstein P, Jerant AF, et al. Are patient ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:229–34.CrossRef Frank P, Friscella K, Shiedls CG, Meldrum SC, Duberstein P, Jerant AF, et al. Are patient ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:229–34.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–22.CrossRefPubMed Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–22.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivasan M, Franks P, Meredith LS, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, Kravitz RL. Connoisseurs of care? Unannounced standardized patients' ratings of physicians. Med Care. 2006;44:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan M, Franks P, Meredith LS, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, Kravitz RL. Connoisseurs of care? Unannounced standardized patients' ratings of physicians. Med Care. 2006;44:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Cancer Risk Communication with Low Health Literacy Patients: A Continuing Medical Education Program
verfasst von
Eboni G. Price-Haywood, MD, MPH
Katherine G. Roth, BA
Kit Shelby
Lisa A. Cooper, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1211-6

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2010

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

03.06.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Wie stark Menschen mit fortgeschrittenem NSCLC von einer Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Hemmern profitieren, hängt offenbar auch davon ab, wie sehr die Diagnose ihre psychische Verfassung erschüttert

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

03.06.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Ein bispezifischer Antikörper formiert gezielt eine Armee neutrophiler Granulozyten gegen Krebszellen. An den Antikörper gekoppeltes TNF-alpha soll die Zellen zudem tief in solide Tumoren hineinführen.

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.