nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.01.2016 | Original Research

Factors Influencing Hospital Admission of Non-critically Ill Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: a Cross-sectional Study

verfasst von: Ashley E. Lewis Hunter, MD, Erica S. Spatz, MD, MHS, Steven L. Bernstein, MD, Marjorie S. Rosenthal, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the factors that influence physicians’ admission decisions, especially among lower acuity patients. For the purpose of our study, non-medical refers to all of the factors—other than the patient’s clinical condition—that could potentially influence admission decisions.

Objective

To describe the influence of non-medical factors on physicians’ decisions to admit non-critically ill patients presenting to the ED.

Design

Cross-sectional study of hospital admissions at a single academic medical center.

Participants

Non-critically ill adult patients admitted to the hospital (n = 297) and the admitting emergency medicine physicians (n = 34).

Main Measures

A patient survey assessed non-medical factors, including primary care access and utilization. A physician survey assessed clinical and non-medical factors influencing the decision to admit. Based on physician responses, admissions were characterized as “strongly acuity-driven,” “moderately acuity-driven,” or “weakly acuity-driven.” Among these admission types, we compared length of stay, cost, and readmission within 30 days to the hospital or ED.

Key Results

Based on the admitting physician’s assessment, we categorized the motivation for admission as strongly acuity-driven in 185 (62 %) admissions, moderately acuity-driven in 92 (31 %), and weakly acuity-driven in 20 (7 %). Per the physician surveys, 51 % of hospitalizations were strongly or moderately influenced by one or more non-medical factors, including lack of information about baseline conditions (23 %); inadequate access to outpatient specialty care (14 %); need for a diagnostic testing or procedure (12 %); a recent ED visit (11 %); and inadequate access to primary care (10 %). Compared with strongly-acuity driven admissions, admissions that were moderately or weakly acuity-driven were shorter and less costly but were associated with similar rates of ED (35 %) and hospital (27 %) readmission.

Conclusions

Non-medical factors are influential in the admission decisions for many patients presenting to the emergency department. Moderately and weakly acuity-driven admissions may represent a feasible target for alternative care pathways.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National Health Expenditures 2011 Highlights. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf. Accessed 4/13/15.

Schuur JD, Venkatesh AK. The growing role of emergency departments in hospital admissions. NEJM. 2012;367:391–3.PubMedCrossRef

Burch VC, Tarr G, Morroni C. Modified early warning score predicts the need for hospital admission and inhospital mortality. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(10):674–8.PubMedCrossRef

Pappas G, Hadden W, Kozak LJ, Fisher GF. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:811–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Booth GL, Hux JE. Relationship between avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus and income level. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:101–6.PubMedCrossRef

Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992;268:2388–94.PubMedCrossRef

Kruzikas DT, Jiang HJ, Remus D, Barrett ML, Coffey RM, Andrews R. Preventable hospitalizations: a window into primary and preventive care, 2000. JCUP Fact Book No. 5, AHRQ Publication No 040056. 2004. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/factbk5/. Accessed 4/13/15.

Jones B, Gundlapalli AV, Jones JP, Brown SM, Dean NC. Admission decisions and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in the homeless population: a review of 172 patients in an urban setting. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:S289–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Goss CH, Rubenfeld GD, Park DR, Sherbin VL, Goodman MS, Root RK. Cost and Incidence of social comorbidities in low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a public hospital. Chest. 2003;124:2148–55.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Perneger TV, Chopard P, Sarasin FP, Gaspoz JM, Lovis C, Unger PF, Junod AF, Waldvogel FA. Risk factors for a medically inappropriate admission to a department of internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1495–500.PubMedCrossRef

11.

DeWalt D, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr K, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes. [Review]. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

Bindman AB, Brumbach K, Osmond D, Komaromy M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, Billings J, Stewart A. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;274:305–11.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Parchman ML, Culler SD. Preventable hospitalizations in primary care shortage areas: an analysis of vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:487–91.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki P, Frey WG, Sox CH, Gaudette C, Rockwell A. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252:2413–7.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Dean NC, Jones JP, Aronsky D, Brown S, Vines CG, Jones BE, Allen T. Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:35–41.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Calder LA, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, Carr LK, Perry JJ, Vaillancourt C, Brehaut J. Mapping out the emergency department disposition decision for high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:567–76.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Mushlin AI, Appel FA. Extramedical factors in the decision to hospitalize medical patients. AJPH. 1976;66:170–2.CrossRef

18.

Soulen JL, Duggan AK, DeAngelis CD. Identification of potentially avoidable pediatric hospital use: admitting physician judgment as a complement to utilization review. Pediatrics. 1994;94:421–4.PubMed

19.

Baumann MR, Strout TD. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the emergency severity index. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:234–40.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR, Kyriacou DN, Adams JG. Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(1):59–65.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.

22.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41:1284–94.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Arozullah AM, Yarnold PR, Bennett CL, Soltysik RC, Wolf MS, Ferreira RM, Lee SY, Costello S, Shakir A, Denwood C, Bryant FB, Davis T. Development and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine. Med Care. 2007;45:1026–33.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Health Literacy Measurement Tools: Fact Sheet. January 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy/index.html. Accessed 4/13/15.

25.

Lee SY. Development of an easy-to-use Spanish health literacy test. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:1392–412.PubMedPubMedCentral

26.

McHorney CA, War JE, Lu R, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40–66.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010 National Health Interview Survey Questionnaire. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm. Accessed 4/13/15.

28.

Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Holroyd-Leduc JM, Lorenzetti D, Straus SE, Sykes L, Quan H. The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(6):732–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Schuur JD, Baugh CW, Hess EP, Hilton JA, Pines JM, Asplin BR. Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):e52–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Pollack CV Jr, Sites FD, Shofer FS, Sease KL, Hollander JE. Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:13–8.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Fothergill A, Christianson TJ, Brown RD Jr, Rabinstein AA. Validation and refinement of the ABCD2 score: a population-based analysis. Stroke. 2009;40:2669–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Sinoff G, Clarfield AM, Bergman H, Beaudet M. A two-year follow-up of geriatric consults in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:716–20.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Bristow DP, Herrick CA. Emergency department case management: the dyad team of nurse case manager and social worker improve discharge planning and patient and staff satisfaction while decreasing inappropriate admissions and costs: a literature review. Prof Case Manag. 2002;7(6):243–51.

35.

Caplan GA, Williams AJ, Daly B, Abraham K. A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department—the DEED II study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(9):1417–23.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Brookoff D, Minniti-Hill M. Emergency department-based home care. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23:1101–6.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Sinclair D, Ackroyd-Stolarz S. Home care and emergency medicine: a pilot project to discharge patients safely from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:951–4.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA. 2009;301:603–18.PubMedCrossRef

39.

McCall N, Cromwell J. Results of the medicare health support disease-management pilot program. NEJM. 2011;365:1704–12.PubMedCrossRef

40.

McLean S, Nurmatov U, Liu JL, Pagliari C, Car J, Sheikh A. Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7, CD007718.PubMed

41.

Shepperd S, Lannin NA, Clemson LM, McCluskey A, Cameron ID, Barras SL. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1, CD000313.PubMed

42.

Phillips CO, Wright SM, Kern DE. Comprehensive discharge planning with post-discharge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291:1358–67.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Courtney M, Edwards H, Chang A, Parker A, Finlayson K, Hamilton K. Fever emergency readmissions and better quality of life for older adults at risk of hospital readmission: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a 24-week exercise and telephone follow-up program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:395–402.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Parker SG, Peet SM, McPherson A, et al. A systematic review of discharge arrangements for older people. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6:i–iv.

45.

Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, Leung A, Williams MV. Interventison to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):520–8.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Oster A, Bindman AB. Emergency department visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: insights into preventable hospitalizations. Med Care. 2003;41:198–207.PubMed

47.

Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey TS, Blank AE, Newman L. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff (Milwood). 1993;12:162–73.CrossRef

48.

Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG. Does increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions? Veterans affairs cooperative study on primary care and hospital readmission. NEJM. 1996;334:1441–7.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Asplin BR, Rhodes KV, Levy H, et al. Insurance status and access to urgent ambulatory care follow-up appointments. JAMA. 2005;294:1248–54.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Guttman A, Afilalo M, Guttman R, Colacone A, Robitaille C, Lang E, Rosenthal S. An emergency department-based nurse discharge coordinator for elder patients: does it make a difference? Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1318–27.PubMed

51.

Caplan GA, Williams AJ, Daly BD, Abraham K. A randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department—The DEED II Study. Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1417–23.CrossRef

52.

Ravens MC, Lowe RA, Maselli J, Hsia RY. Comparison of presenting complaint vs discharge diagnosis for identifying “nonemergency” emergency department visits. JAMA. 2013;309:1145–53.CrossRef

Titel: Factors Influencing Hospital Admission of Non-critically Ill Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: a Cross-sectional Study
verfasst von: Ashley E. Lewis Hunter, MD
Erica S. Spatz, MD, MHS
Steven L. Bernstein, MD
Marjorie S. Rosenthal, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3438-8

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Factors Influencing Hospital Admission of Non-critically Ill Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: a Cross-sectional Study