Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports 6/2012

01.12.2012 | Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed, Section Editor)

Robotic Surgery for Gynaecologic Cancer: An Overview

verfasst von: René Verheijen, Ronald Zweemer

Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

After decades of reluctance to change surgical approaches, new technologies have created new perspectives for surgery. Initially, the laparoscopic approach was considered to be only one useful for relatively simple procedures as the design of the instruments and the limited access hampered free movements to perform complicated surgery. Robotic systems overcame this problem and boosted the use of minimally invasive techniques also for radical gynaecological surgery. Robot-assisted laparoscopy can now routinely be used for the surgical treatment of early or downstaged cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma and staging of early ovarian carcinoma. Robot-assisted laparoscopy has proven to be feasible, although the benefits for the patient are less clear than those for the surgeon. The main advantage of robot-assisted laparoscopy over conventional laparoscopy is probably not that it is safer or better, but that it allows more types of radical surgery to be performed and that it prevents the surgeon from developing complaints and muscular conditions that interfere with the ability to perform surgery. New applications have emerged with the introduction of new devices to be used in conjunction with the robotic system as well as with totally new robotic systems. Training in these new tools should be more systematic and structured to allow their safe introduction and use.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri. Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1912;66:169–232. Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri. Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1912;66:169–232.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich H, DeCaprio J, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213–6.CrossRef Reich H, DeCaprio J, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213–6.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dargent D. A new future for Schauta’s operation through pre-surgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1987;8:292–6. Dargent D. A new future for Schauta’s operation through pre-surgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1987;8:292–6.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864–5.PubMed Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864–5.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27:531–3.PubMed Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27:531–3.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:438–43.PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:438–43.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarlos D, Kots LV, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: costs and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282(Suppl):11–2. Sarlos D, Kots LV, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: costs and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282(Suppl):11–2.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1005–13.PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1005–13.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1601–8.PubMedCrossRef Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1601–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:584–8.PubMedCrossRef Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:584–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat • Herron DM, Marohm M. The SAGES MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:313–25. This article is an example of recommendations and rules for the safe introduction of robotic surgery.PubMedCrossRef • Herron DM, Marohm M. The SAGES MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:313–25. This article is an example of recommendations and rules for the safe introduction of robotic surgery.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Onvoldoende zorgvuldigheid bij introductie van operatierobots. Den Haag: 2010. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Onvoldoende zorgvuldigheid bij introductie van operatierobots. Den Haag: 2010.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:162–7.PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:162–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, et al. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012;119:137–49. This article highlights the importance of training in robot-assisted laparoscopy and gives an overview of requirements and current possibilities for adequate training.PubMedCrossRef •• Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, et al. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG. 2012;119:137–49. This article highlights the importance of training in robot-assisted laparoscopy and gives an overview of requirements and current possibilities for adequate training.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:357.e1–7.CrossRef Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:357.e1–7.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, et al. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:334–9.PubMedCrossRef Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, et al. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:334–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:564–7.PubMedCrossRef Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:564–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, et al. Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:569–72.PubMedCrossRef Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, et al. Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:569–72.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Bannier M, et al. Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:409–13.PubMedCrossRef Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Bannier M, et al. Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:409–13.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan WS, Kong KK, Nikam YA, et al. Vaginal vault dehiscence after laparoscopic hysterectomy over a nine-year period at Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit - our experiences and current understanding of vaginal vault dehiscence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:121–7.PubMedCrossRef Chan WS, Kong KK, Nikam YA, et al. Vaginal vault dehiscence after laparoscopic hysterectomy over a nine-year period at Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit - our experiences and current understanding of vaginal vault dehiscence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:121–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:185–90.PubMedCrossRef Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:185–90.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:119.e1–12.CrossRef Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:119.e1–12.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang JH, Lee JK, Lee NW, et al. Vaginal cuff closure: a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:163–9.PubMedCrossRef Hwang JH, Lee JK, Lee NW, et al. Vaginal cuff closure: a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:163–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat ElSahwi KS, Hooper C, De Leon MC, et al. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:260–4.PubMedCrossRef ElSahwi KS, Hooper C, De Leon MC, et al. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:260–4.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ, et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:763–71.PubMedCrossRef Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ, et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:763–71.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Obermair A, Janda M, Baker J, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, et al. Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1147–53.PubMedCrossRef Obermair A, Janda M, Baker J, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, et al. Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1147–53.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, et al. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:685–93.PubMedCrossRef Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, et al. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:685–93.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Holloway RW, Brudie LA, Rakowski JA, et al. Robotic-assisted resection of liver and diaphragm recurrent ovarian carcinoma: description of technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:419–22.PubMedCrossRef Holloway RW, Brudie LA, Rakowski JA, et al. Robotic-assisted resection of liver and diaphragm recurrent ovarian carcinoma: description of technique. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:419–22.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, et al. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:100–5.PubMedCrossRef Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, et al. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:100–5.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Farghaly SA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Farghaly's technique. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31(4):361–3.PubMed Farghaly SA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Farghaly's technique. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31(4):361–3.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds RK, Burke WM, Advincula AP. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies. JSLS. 2005;9:149–58.PubMed Reynolds RK, Burke WM, Advincula AP. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies. JSLS. 2005;9:149–58.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:600–8.PubMedCrossRef Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:600–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang N, Liu H, Zhang Z, et al. The difference of the impacts of surgical approaches on cellular immunity in patients with uterine malignancies: a comparative study of laparoscopy and laparotomy surgery. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:177–82.PubMedCrossRef Zhang N, Liu H, Zhang Z, et al. The difference of the impacts of surgical approaches on cellular immunity in patients with uterine malignancies: a comparative study of laparoscopy and laparotomy surgery. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:177–82.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL. Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):1–18. vii.PubMedCrossRef Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL. Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):1–18. vii.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Sert B. Robotic port-site and pelvic recurrences after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for a stage IB1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6:132–5.PubMed Sert B. Robotic port-site and pelvic recurrences after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for a stage IB1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6:132–5.PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Lande J, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Lettinga RG, et al. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:107–14.PubMedCrossRef van de Lande J, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Lettinga RG, et al. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:107–14.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182:1126–32.PubMedCrossRef Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182:1126–32.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dam GM, Themelis G, Crane LM, et al. Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-alpha targeting: first in-human results. Nat Med. 2011;17:1315–9.PubMedCrossRef van Dam GM, Themelis G, Crane LM, et al. Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-alpha targeting: first in-human results. Nat Med. 2011;17:1315–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane LM, Themelis G, Pleijhuis RG, et al. Intraoperative multispectral fluorescence imaging for the detection of the sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: a novel concept. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(5):1043–9.PubMedCrossRef Crane LM, Themelis G, Pleijhuis RG, et al. Intraoperative multispectral fluorescence imaging for the detection of the sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: a novel concept. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(5):1043–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Surgery for Gynaecologic Cancer: An Overview
verfasst von
René Verheijen
Ronald Zweemer
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Oncology Reports / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1523-3790
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-012-0270-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Current Oncology Reports 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Cancer Prevention (J Cuzick, Section Editor)

HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer

Gynecologic Cancers (NS Reed, Section Editor)

Surgery for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: When Should it Be Offered?

Innovations in Information Technology in Cancer Medicine (RB Jones, Section Editor)

Overview of Electronic Data Sharing: Why, How, and Impact

Bei seelischem Stress sind Checkpoint-Hemmer weniger wirksam

03.06.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Wie stark Menschen mit fortgeschrittenem NSCLC von einer Therapie mit Immun-Checkpoint-Hemmern profitieren, hängt offenbar auch davon ab, wie sehr die Diagnose ihre psychische Verfassung erschüttert

Antikörper mobilisiert Neutrophile gegen Krebs

03.06.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Ein bispezifischer Antikörper formiert gezielt eine Armee neutrophiler Granulozyten gegen Krebszellen. An den Antikörper gekoppeltes TNF-alpha soll die Zellen zudem tief in solide Tumoren hineinführen.

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.