nach oben

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Erschienen in:

01.07.2011 | Clinical Research

Is Total Hip Arthroplasty after Hip Arthrodesis as Good as Primary Arthroplasty?

verfasst von: Mariano Fernandez-Fairen, PhD, MD, Antonio Murcia-Mazón, PhD, MD, Ana Torres, MD, Virginia Querales, MD, Antonio Murcia Jr, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 7/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Conversion of hip arthrodesis to a THA reportedly provides a reasonable solution, improving function, reducing back and knee pain, and slowing degeneration of neighboring joints associated with a hip fusion. Patients generally are satisfied with conversion despite the fact that range of mobility, muscle strength, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), persistence of limp, and need for assistive walking aids generally are worse than those for conventional primary THA.

Questions/purposes

We compared THA after hip arthrodesis and primary THA to determine whether these procedures would be associated with similar functional scores, maintenance of scores with time, complications and failures, survivorship of the arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively matched 48 patients undergoing conversion of a fused hip to a THA between January 1980 and January 2000, with 50 patients receiving a primary THA during the same period. We prospectively followed all patients between January 2000 and January 2010. The changes in function and pain after THA were compared between the two cohorts using the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Rosser Index Matrix (RIM). The Oxford hip score (OHS) and the SF-36 also were used to assess quality of life (QOL) during followup. Complications were collected and survivorship of the THA was evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Robertsson and Dunbar questionnaire. The minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 17 years; range, 10–29 years).

Results

At last followup, hip function and health-related QOL were similar for patients having conversion of hip arthrodesis to THA and for patients having a routine THA. Scores diminished overall in the two groups between 2000 and 2010, but without a difference for the HHS, RIM QOL, and OHS in the study cohort. The rate of complications, THA survival, and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Conversion of hip arthrodesis to a THA provides substantial improvement of hip function and health-related QOL, with an acceptable rate of complications, good expectancy of survival for the arthroplasty, and high level of patient satisfaction comparable to those of primary THA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aaron A, Weinstein D, Thickman D, Eilert R. Comparison of orthoroentgenography and computed tomography in the measurement of limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:897–902.PubMed

Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. [The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results] [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;104:771–776.

Alonso J, Regidor E, Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodriguez C, de la Fuente L. [Population reference values of the Spanish version of the Health Questionnaire SF-36] [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 1998;111:410–416.

Beaulé PE, Matta JM, Mast JW. Hip arthrodesis: current indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:249–258.PubMed

Benroth R, Gawande S. Patient-reported health status in total joint replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:576–580.PubMedCrossRef

Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:171–177.PubMed

Bourne RB, Chesworth B, Davies A, Mahomed N, Charron K. Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:542–546.PubMedCrossRef

Brinker MR, Lund PJ, Cox DD, Barrack RL. Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:820–830.PubMedCrossRef

Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, Rijnberg WJ. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:495–498.PubMed

10.

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–1632.PubMed

11.

Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740–747.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Callaghan JJ, Brand RA, Pedersen DR. Hip arthrodesis: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1328–1335.PubMed

13.

Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76.PubMed

14.

Clohisy JC, Oryhon JM, Seyler TM, Wells CW, Liu SS, Callaghan JJ, Mont MA. Function and fixation of total hip arthroplasty in patients 25 years of age or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 July 29. [Epub ahead of print]

15.

Coast J. Reprocessing data to form QALYs. BMJ. 1992;305:87–90.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:185–190.PubMed

17.

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1125–1129.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton D, Flynn J, Smith P, Gundle R, Murray D. Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery: a review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using revision rates, survival analysis, and patient-based measures. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:710–717.PubMedCrossRef

19.

DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:20–32.PubMed

20.

de Nies F, Fidler MW. Visual analog scale for the assessment of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:416–419.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengström A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:457–462.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107–128.PubMed

23.

Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register: 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0–22 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:28–41.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesœter LB, Langeland N, Vollset SE. Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;351:135–148.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Forsythe ME, Whitehouse SL, Dick J, Crawford RW. Functional outcomes following nonrecurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:227–230.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Gogia PP, Braatz JH. Validity and reliability of leg length measurements. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1986;8:185–188.PubMed

27.

Green WT, Wyatt GM, Anderson M. Orthoroengenography as a method of measuring the bones of the lower extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;61:10–15.PubMed

28.

Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMed

29.

Hamadouche M, Kerboull L, Meunier A, Courpied JP, Kerboull M. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of ankylosed hips: a five to twenty-one-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:992–998.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hardinge K, Murphy JC, Frenyo S. Conversion of hip fusion to Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;211:173–179.PubMed

31.

Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.

32.

Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O’Neill DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063–1067.PubMed

33.

Hoeksma HL, Van den Ende CH, Ronday HK, Heering A, Breedveld FC, Dekker J. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:935–938.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Jibodh SR, Kandil AO, Malchau H, Estok DM 2nd. Do commonly reported outcome measures reflect patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:41–45.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:161–168.PubMed

36.

Joshi AB, Markovic L, Hardinge K, Murphy JC. Conversion of a fused hip to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1335–1341.PubMed

37.

Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1037–1041.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Katz JN, Phillips CB, Baron JA, Fossel AH, Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Lingard EA, Harris WH, Poss R, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Wright EA, Losina E. Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:560–568.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Keener JD, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Pederson D, Sullivan P, Johnston RC. Long-term function after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:148–156.PubMed

40.

Kilgus DJ, Amstutz HC, Wolgin MA, Dorey FJ. Joint replacement for ankylosed hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:45–54.PubMed

41.

Krishnan SP, Carrington RW, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:409–412.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Wong C, Tugwell P, Leslie K, Bullas R. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1619–1626.PubMed

43.

Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Kilgus DJ, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:639–645.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:518–528.PubMed

45.

Lustig S, Vaz G, Guyen O, Tayot O, Chavane H, Bejui-Hugues J, Carret JP. [Total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis performed for septic arthritis] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93:828–835.PubMed

46.

Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29:1273–1279.PubMed

47.

Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients’ expectation and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396.PubMedCrossRef

48.

McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Morsi E. Total hip arthroplasty for fused hips: planning and techniques. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:871–875.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS. Patient relevant outcomes after total hip replacement: a comparison between different surgical techniques. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:21.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:801–808.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Panagiotopoulos KP, Robbins GM, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Conversion of hip arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:297–305.PubMed

53.

Peterson ED, Nemanich JP, Altenburg A, Cabanela ME. Hip arthroplasty after previous arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2880–2885.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Rajaratnam SS, Sexton SA, Waters TS, Walter WL, Zicat BA, Walter WK. Long term results of cementless total hip replacement for reversal of hip ankylosis. Hip Int. 2009;19:120–127.PubMed

55.

Reikerås O, Bjerkreim I, Gundersson R. Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hips: 5- to 13-year results. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:529–531.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Restrepo C, Lettich T, Roberts N, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients less than twenty-years. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74:615–622.PubMed

57.

Richards CJ, Duncan CP. Conversion of hip arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty: survivorship and clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2010 March 24. [Epub ahead of print].

58.

Rittmeister M, Starker M, Zichner L. Hip and knee replacement after longstanding hip arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:136–145.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:476–482.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Robinson AH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:42–45.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Rosser RM, Watts VC. The measurement of hospital output. Int J Epidemiol. 1972;1:361–368.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Schäfer D, Dick W, Morscher E. Total hip arthroplasty after arthrodesis of the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:176–178.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Schafroth MU, Blokzijl RJ, Haverkamp D, Maas M, Marti RK. The long-term fate of the hip arthrodesis: does it remain a valid procedure for selected cases in the 21st century? Int Orthop. 2010;34:805–810.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Schuh A, Zeiler G, Werber S. [Results and experiences of conversion of hip arthrodesis] [in German]. Orthopäde. 2005;34:218–224.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Sirikonda SP, Beardmore SP, Hodgkinson JP. Role of hip arthrodesis in current practice: long term results following conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2008;18:263–271.PubMed

66.

Sochart DH, Porter ML. Long-term results of total hip replacement in young patients who had ankylosing spondylitis: eighteen to thirty-year results with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1181–1189.PubMed

67.

Sochart DH, Porter ML. The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1599–1617.PubMed

68.

Sofue M, Kono S, Kawaji W, Homma M. Long term results of arthrodesis for severe osteoarthritis of the hip in young adults. Int Orthop. 1989;13:129–133.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Spangehl MJ. Total hip arthroplasty after hip fusion. In: Lieberman JR, Berry DJ, eds. Advanced Reconstruction: Hip. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2005:151–157.

70.

Sponseller PD, McBeath AA, Perpich M. Hip arthrodesis in young patients: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:853–859.PubMed

71.

Stickles B, Phillips L, Brox WT, Owens B, Lanzer WL. Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty. Obes Res. 2001;9:219–223.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Stover MD, Beaulé PE, Matta JM, Mast JW. Hip arthrodesis: a procedure for the new millennium? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:126–133.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Strathy GM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Total hip arthroplasty in the ankylosed hip: a ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:963–966.PubMed

74.

van Biezen FC, van Gool RA, Reijman M, Verhaar JA. [Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after previous hip arthrodesis] [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007;151:2148–2153.PubMed

75.

Ware JE, Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:405-413; discussion 415–420.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Wölfel AR, Walther M, Rader C, Beck H. [Endoprosthetic management of patients with hip arthrodesis] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2000;138:318–323.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Zeiler G, Schuh A. [Arthrodesis of the hip and its conversion] [in German]. Orthopäde. 2004;33:939–956; quiz 957.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Is Total Hip Arthroplasty after Hip Arthrodesis as Good as Primary Arthroplasty?
verfasst von: Mariano Fernandez-Fairen, PhD, MD
Antonio Murcia-Mazón, PhD, MD
Ana Torres, MD
Virginia Querales, MD
Antonio Murcia Jr, MD
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1704-y

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Is Total Hip Arthroplasty after Hip Arthrodesis as Good as Primary Arthroplasty?