Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2/2018

01.04.2018 | Review Article

Teledermatology: A Review and Update

verfasst von: Jonathan J. Lee, Joseph C. English III

Erschienen in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Telemedicine is slowly transforming the way in which healthcare is delivered and has the potential to improve access to subspecialty expertise, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the overall quality of care. While many subspecialty fields within medicine today have either experimented with or begun to implement telemedicine platforms to enable remote consultation and care, dermatology is particularly suited for this care system as skin disorders are uniquely visible to the human eye. Through teledermatology, diagnostic images of skin disorders with accompanying clinical histories can be remotely reviewed by teledermatologists by any number of modalities, such as photographic clinical images or live video teleconferencing. Diagnoses and treatment recommendations can then be rendered and implemented remotely. The evidence to date supports both its diagnostic and treatment accuracy and its cost effectiveness. Administrative, regulatory, privacy, and reimbursement policies surrounding this dynamic field continue to evolve. In this review, we examine the history, evidence, and administrative landscape surrounding teledermatology and discuss current practice guidelines and ongoing controversies.
Literatur
1.
Porter DP, Porter R. Patient’s progress: doctors and doctoring in eighteenth-century England. Cambridge: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell; 1989.
2.
Einthoven W. Le télécardiogramme. Archives Internationales de Physiologie. 1906;4(2):132–64.
3.
Brown SG. A telephone relay. J Inst Electr Eng. 1910;45:590–601.
4.
5.
Thrall JH. Teleradiology. Part I. History and clinical applications. Radiology. 2007;243(3):613–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Mullick FG, Fontelo P, Pemble C. Telemedicine and telepathology at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology: history and current mission. Telemed J. 1996;2(3):187–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Vidmar DA. The history of teledermatology in the Department of Defense. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17(1):113–24 (ix).CrossRefPubMed
8.
Rosenbaum BE, Campion CH, Cohen JM, Latkowski JA. The Department of Defense: pioneers of early teledermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23(2).
9.
10.
11.
Coates SJ, Kvedar J, Granstein RD. Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: history, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):563–74 (quiz 575–566).CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Edison KE, Ward DS, Dyer JA, Lane W, Chance L, Hicks LL. Diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and management concordance in live-interactive and store-and-forward teledermatology compared to in-person examination. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(9):889–95.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Lim AC, Egerton IB, See A, Shumack SP. Accuracy and reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology: preliminary results from the St George Teledermatology Project. Australas J Dermatol. 2001;42(4):247–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Pak HS, Welch M, Poropatich R. Web-based teledermatology consult system: preliminary results from the first 100 cases. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;64:179–84.PubMed
16.
Lamel S, Chambers CJ, Ratnarathorn M, Armstrong AW. Impact of live interactive teledermatology on diagnosis, disease management, and clinical outcomes. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(1):61–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kvedar JC, Edwards RA, Menn ER, et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(2):161–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(2):171–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
High WA, Houston MS, Calobrisi SD, Drage LA, McEvoy MT. Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(5 Pt 1):776–83.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Whited JD, Hall RP, Simel DL, et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists’ clinic-based and digital image consultations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(5 Pt 1):693–702.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Heffner VA, Lyon VB, Brousseau DC, Holland KE, Yen K. Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(6):956–61.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Warshaw EM, Gravely AA, Nelson DB. Reliability of store and forward teledermatology for skin neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(3):426–35.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gilmour E, Campbell SM, Loane MA, et al. Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(1):81–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Lowitt MH, Kessler II, Kauffman CL, Hooper FJ, Siegel E, Burnett JW. Teledermatology and in-person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(4):471–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nami N, Massone C, Rubegni P, Cevenini G, Fimiani M, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Concordance and time estimation of store-and-forward mobile teledermatology compared to classical face-to-face consultation. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Mahendran R, Goodfield MJ, Sheehan-Dare RA. An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30(3):209–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Oakley AM, Reeves F, Bennett J, Holmes SH, Wickham H. Diagnostic value of written referral and/or images for skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(3):151–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Krupinski EA, LeSueur B, Ellsworth L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J. 1999;5(3):257–63.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Bernal AP, Duran RC, Martin JJ, Camacho F. Teledermatology as a filtering system in pigmented lesion clinics. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(6):298–303.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Rios-Yuil JM. Correlation between face-to-face assessment and telemedicine for the diagnosis of skin disease in case conferences. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012;103(2):138–43.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lozzi GP, Soyer HP, Massone C, et al. The additive value of second opinion teleconsulting in the management of patients with challenging inflammatory, neoplastic skin diseases: a best practice model in dermatology? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(1):30–4.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Warshaw EM, Lederle FA, Grill JP, et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for nonpigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(4):579–88.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Warshaw EM, Lederle FA, Grill JP, et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(5):753–65.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Lamel SA, Haldeman KM, Ely H, Kovarik CL, Pak H, Armstrong AW. Application of mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):576–81.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Rubegni P, Nami N, Cevenini G, et al. Geriatric teledermatology: store-and-forward vs. face-to-face examination. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(11):1334–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Romero G, Sanchez P, Garcia M, Cortina P, Vera E, Garrido JA. Randomized controlled trial comparing store-and-forward teledermatology alone and in combination with web-camera videoconferencing. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010;35(3):311–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Pak HS, Harden D, Cruess D, Welch ML, Poropatich R, National Capital Area Teledermatology Consortium. Teledermatology: an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, Part II. Cutis. 2003;71(6):476–80.PubMed
38.
Shapiro M, James WD, Kessler R, et al. Comparison of skin biopsy triage decisions in 49 patients with pigmented lesions and skin neoplasms: store-and-forward teledermatology vs face-to-face dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(5):525–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Whited JD, Mills BJ, Hall RP, Drugge RJ, Grichnik JM, Simel DL. A pilot trial of digital imaging in skin cancer. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4(2):108–12.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Ferrandiz L, Moreno-Ramirez D, Nieto-Garcia A, et al. Teledermatology-based presurgical management for nonmelanoma skin cancer: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(9):1092–8.PubMed
41.
Barbieri JS, Nelson CA, James WD, et al. The reliability of teledermatology to triage inpatient dermatology consultations. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(4):419–24.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S1–3.CrossRefPubMed
43.
van der Heijden JP, de Keizer NF, Bos JD, Spuls PI, Witkamp L. Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(5):1058–65.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Morton CA, Downie F, Auld S, et al. Community photo-triage for skin cancer referrals: an aid to service delivery. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011;36(3):248–54.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Datta SK, Warshaw EM, Edison KE, et al. Cost and utility analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology referral system: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(12):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Eminovic N, Dijkgraaf MG, Berghout RM, Prins AH, Bindels PJ, de Keizer NF. A cost minimisation analysis in teledermatology: model-based approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Ferrandiz L, Moreno-Ramirez D, Ruiz-de-Casas A, et al. An economic analysis of presurgical teledermatology in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2008;99(10):795–802.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Lim D, Oakley AM, Rademaker M. Better, sooner, more convenient: a successful teledermoscopy service. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(1):22–5.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L. A 10-year history of teledermatology for skin cancer management. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(12):1289–90.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Pak HS, Datta SK, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Cost minimization analysis of a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(2):160–5.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Parsi K, Chambers CJ, Armstrong AW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a patient-centered care model for management of psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(4):563–70.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, et al. Teledermatology’s impact on time to intervention among referrals to a dermatology consult service. Telemed J E Health. 2002;8(3):313–21.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Armstrong AW, Dorer DJ, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(2):91–9.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Bergmo TS. A cost-minimization analysis of a realtime teledermatology service in northern Norway. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(5):273–7.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Chan HH, Woo J, Chan WM, Hjelm M. Teledermatology in Hong Kong: a cost-effective method to provide service to the elderly patients living in institutions. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(10):774–8.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Dekio I, Hanada E, Chinuki Y, et al. Usefulness and economic evaluation of ADSL-based live interactive teledermatology in areas with shortage of dermatologists. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(11):1272–5.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Lamminen H, Tuomi ML, Lamminen J, Uusitalo H. A feasibility study of realtime teledermatology in Finland. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(2):102–7.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143(6):1241–7.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Loane MA, Oakley A, Rademaker M, et al. A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(4):233–8.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1252–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Snoswell C, Finnane A, Janda M, Soyer HP, Whitty JA. Cost-effectiveness of store-and-forward teledermatology: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(6):702–8.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Hsiao JL, Oh DH. The impact of store-and-forward teledermatology on skin cancer diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(2):260–7.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Wootton R, Bahaadinbeigy K, Hailey D. Estimating travel reduction associated with the use of telemedicine by patients and healthcare professionals: proposal for quantitative synthesis in a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Ferrandiz L, Ojeda-Vila T, Corrales A, et al. Internet-based skin cancer screening using clinical images alone or in conjunction with dermoscopic images: a randomized teledermoscopy trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(4):676–82.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Resneck JS Jr, Abrouk M, Steuer M, et al. Choice, transparency, coordination, and quality among direct-to-consumer telemedicine websites and apps treating skin disease. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(7):768–75.CrossRefPubMed
66.
67.
68.
McKoy K, Antoniotti NM, Armstrong A, et al. Practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(12):981–90.CrossRefPubMed
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
Kassianos AP, Emery JD, Murchie P, Walter FM. Smartphone applications for melanoma detection by community, patient and generalist clinician users: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(6):1507–18.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(4):422–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
75.
Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Ruiz-de-Casas A, et al. Economic evaluation of a store-and-forward teledermatology system for skin cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(1):40–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Teledermatology: A Review and Update
verfasst von
Jonathan J. Lee
Joseph C. English III
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Meeting Report

American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting: San Diego, CA, USA, 16–20 Feb 2018

Review Article

Laser and Light Treatments for Hair Reduction in Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV–VI: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Review Article

Small Molecule Inhibitors of the Hedgehog Pathway in the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin

Original Research Article

Comparison of Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 Days (UAS7) Values Obtained from Once-Daily and Twice-Daily Versions: Results from the ASSURE-CSU Study

Review Article

Vitamin D and the Skin: An Update for Dermatologists

Review Article

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

Leitlinien kompakt für die Dermatologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Dermatologie

Studienlage spricht für Isotretinoin zur Rosazea-Therapie

23.05.2024 Rosazea Nachrichten

Isotretinoin wird off-label zur Behandlung von Rosazea eingesetzt. Wie solide die Evidenz dafür ist, wurde jetzt in einem systematischen Review überprüft.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Riesenzellarteriitis: 15% der Patienten sind von okkulter Form betroffen

16.05.2024 Riesenzellarteriitis Nachrichten

In einer retrospektiven Untersuchung haben Forschende aus Belgien und den Niederlanden die okkulte Form der Riesenzellarteriitis genauer unter die Lupe genommen. In puncto Therapie und Rezidivraten stellten sie keinen sehr großen Unterschied zu Erkrankten mit kranialen Symptomen fest.

Update Dermatologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise