Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BioDrugs 4/2014

01.08.2014 | Review Article

Practical Considerations for the Pharmacokinetic and Immunogenic Assessment of Antibody–Drug Conjugates

verfasst von: Melody Sauerborn, William van Dongen

Erschienen in: BioDrugs | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Currently, the most bioanalytically challenging drugs are antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), constructs comprising a monoclonal antibody and a cytotoxic drug connected by a linker. The bioanalytical challenges arise from the heterogeneous nature of ADCs and their complex in vivo behavior, resulting in a high number of analytes to be measured. Measuring the concentration of biologics in blood/plasma/serum is a necessity to properly assess their pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic behaviors in vivo. An additional bioanalytical challenge is to monitor the stability of the ADCs, as cytotoxic drugs released from the ADC in blood circulation may pose a potential safety risk because of their high cytotoxic potency. The nature of ADCs does not only complicate bioanalysis, but also immunogenicity assessment. Questions, such as ‘Which part of the ADCs is the anti-drug antibodies directed against?’ may arise, and their answer normally includes several immunogenicity risk assessment strategies. This review will focus on the bioanalytical challenges of ADCs, current approaches involving ligand-binding assays (LBAs), liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry platforms, and recommendations on which approach to use for which stage of drug development, and will close with immunogenicity assessment. In order to appropriately tackle the bioanalytical and immunogenic challenges of ADCs and consider every angle, the authors of this review have expertise in ligand binding and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Flygare JA, Pillow TH, Aristoff P. Antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81(1):113–21.PubMedCrossRef Flygare JA, Pillow TH, Aristoff P. Antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81(1):113–21.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer U, Kadambi VJ. Antibody drug conjugates—Trojan horses in the war on cancer. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011;64(3):207–12.PubMedCrossRef Iyer U, Kadambi VJ. Antibody drug conjugates—Trojan horses in the war on cancer. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011;64(3):207–12.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert JM. Drug-conjugated antibodies for the treatment of cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(2):248–62.PubMedCrossRef Lambert JM. Drug-conjugated antibodies for the treatment of cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(2):248–62.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Senter PD, Sievers EL. The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(7):631–7.PubMedCrossRef Senter PD, Sievers EL. The discovery and development of brentuximab vedotin for use in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(7):631–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis Phillips GD, et al. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008;68(22):9280–90. Lewis Phillips GD, et al. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008;68(22):9280–90.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamblett KJ, et al. Effects of drug loading on the antitumor activity of a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(20):7063–70.PubMedCrossRef Hamblett KJ, et al. Effects of drug loading on the antitumor activity of a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(20):7063–70.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu K, et al. Characterization of intact antibody–drug conjugates from plasma/serum in vivo by affinity capture capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2011;412(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRef Xu K, et al. Characterization of intact antibody–drug conjugates from plasma/serum in vivo by affinity capture capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2011;412(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun X, et al. Design of antibody-maytansinoid conjugates allows for efficient detoxification via liver metabolism. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22(4):728–35.PubMedCrossRef Sun X, et al. Design of antibody-maytansinoid conjugates allows for efficient detoxification via liver metabolism. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22(4):728–35.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorovits B, et al. Bioanalysis of antibody–drug conjugates: American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Antibody–Drug Conjugate Working Group position paper. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(9):997–1006.PubMedCrossRef Gorovits B, et al. Bioanalysis of antibody–drug conjugates: American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Antibody–Drug Conjugate Working Group position paper. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(9):997–1006.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopfgartner G, Bourgogne E. Quantitative high-throughput analysis of drugs in biological matrices by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2003;22(3):195–214.PubMedCrossRef Hopfgartner G, Bourgogne E. Quantitative high-throughput analysis of drugs in biological matrices by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2003;22(3):195–214.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu RN, et al. Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC–MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;44(2):342–55.PubMedCrossRef Xu RN, et al. Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC–MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;44(2):342–55.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan JP, Kozak KR, Wong WL. Challenges in developing bioanalytical assays for characterization of antibody–drug conjugates. Bioanalysis. 2011;3(6):677–700.PubMedCrossRef Stephan JP, Kozak KR, Wong WL. Challenges in developing bioanalytical assays for characterization of antibody–drug conjugates. Bioanalysis. 2011;3(6):677–700.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanderson RJ, et al. In vivo drug-linker stability of an anti-CD30 dipeptide-linked auristatin immunoconjugate. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(2 Pt 1):843–52.PubMed Sanderson RJ, et al. In vivo drug-linker stability of an anti-CD30 dipeptide-linked auristatin immunoconjugate. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(2 Pt 1):843–52.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan JP, et al. Anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF conjugates: impact of assay format on pharmacokinetic parameters determination. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19(8):1673–83.PubMedCrossRef Stephan JP, et al. Anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF conjugates: impact of assay format on pharmacokinetic parameters determination. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19(8):1673–83.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozak KR, et al. Total antibody quantification for MMAE-conjugated antibody–drug conjugates: impact of assay format and reagents. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24(5):772–9.PubMedCrossRef Kozak KR, et al. Total antibody quantification for MMAE-conjugated antibody–drug conjugates: impact of assay format and reagents. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24(5):772–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, et al. General LC–MS/MS method approach to quantify therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a common whole antibody internal standard with application to preclinical studies. Anal Chem. 2012;84(3):1267–73.PubMedCrossRef Li H, et al. General LC–MS/MS method approach to quantify therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a common whole antibody internal standard with application to preclinical studies. Anal Chem. 2012;84(3):1267–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Broek I, Niessen WM, van Dongen WD. Bioanalytical LC–MS/MS of protein-based biopharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;929:161–79.PubMedCrossRef van den Broek I, Niessen WM, van Dongen WD. Bioanalytical LC–MS/MS of protein-based biopharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;929:161–79.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez Ocana M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetic assessment of an anti-MAdCAM monoclonal antibody therapeutic by LC–MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2012;84(14):5959–67. Fernandez Ocana M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetic assessment of an anti-MAdCAM monoclonal antibody therapeutic by LC–MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2012;84(14):5959–67.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaur S, et al. Bioanalytical assay strategies for the development of antibody–drug conjugate biotherapeutics. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(2):201–26.PubMedCrossRef Kaur S, et al. Bioanalytical assay strategies for the development of antibody–drug conjugate biotherapeutics. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(2):201–26.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin K, Tibbitts J. Pharmacokinetic considerations for antibody drug conjugates. Pharm Res. 2012;29(9):2354–66.PubMedCrossRef Lin K, Tibbitts J. Pharmacokinetic considerations for antibody drug conjugates. Pharm Res. 2012;29(9):2354–66.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rispens T, et al. Mechanism of immunoglobulin G4 Fab-arm exchange. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(26):10302–11.PubMedCrossRef Rispens T, et al. Mechanism of immunoglobulin G4 Fab-arm exchange. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(26):10302–11.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Labrijn AF, et al. Therapeutic IgG4 antibodies engage in Fab-arm exchange with endogenous human IgG4 in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(8):767–71.PubMedCrossRef Labrijn AF, et al. Therapeutic IgG4 antibodies engage in Fab-arm exchange with endogenous human IgG4 in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(8):767–71.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stubenrauch K, et al. Impact of molecular processing in the hinge region of therapeutic IgG4 antibodies on disposition profiles in cynomolgus monkeys. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(1):84–91.PubMedCrossRef Stubenrauch K, et al. Impact of molecular processing in the hinge region of therapeutic IgG4 antibodies on disposition profiles in cynomolgus monkeys. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(1):84–91.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Serum therapy revisited: animal models of infection and development of passive antibody therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38(8):1695–702.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Serum therapy revisited: animal models of infection and development of passive antibody therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38(8):1695–702.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schellekens H. Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(Suppl 6):vi3–9. Schellekens H. Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(Suppl 6):vi3–9.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2014. MAbs 2013;6(1):5–14. Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2014. MAbs 2013;6(1):5–14.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansel TT, et al. The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(4):325–38.PubMedCrossRef Hansel TT, et al. The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(4):325–38.PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaderi D, et al. Production platforms for biotherapeutic glycoproteins. Occurrence, impact, and challenges of non-human sialylation. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2012;28:147–75.PubMedCrossRef Ghaderi D, et al. Production platforms for biotherapeutic glycoproteins. Occurrence, impact, and challenges of non-human sialylation. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2012;28:147–75.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin BJ, et al. Generation of glyco-engineered BY2 cell lines with decreased expression of plant-specific glycoepitopes. Protein Cell. 2011;2(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef Yin BJ, et al. Generation of glyco-engineered BY2 cell lines with decreased expression of plant-specific glycoepitopes. Protein Cell. 2011;2(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore WV, Leppert P. Role of aggregated human growth hormone (hGH) in development of antibodies to hGH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(4):691–7.PubMedCrossRef Moore WV, Leppert P. Role of aggregated human growth hormone (hGH) in development of antibodies to hGH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(4):691–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerborn M, et al. Immunological mechanism underlying the immune response to recombinant human protein therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31(2):53–9.PubMedCrossRef Sauerborn M, et al. Immunological mechanism underlying the immune response to recombinant human protein therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31(2):53–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratanji KD, et al. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: influence of aggregation. J Immunotoxicol. 2014;11(2):99–109. Ratanji KD, et al. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: influence of aggregation. J Immunotoxicol. 2014;11(2):99–109.
36.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Krieckaert C, Rispens T, Wolbink G. Immunogenicity of biological therapeutics: from assay to patient. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012;24(3):306–11.PubMedCrossRef Krieckaert C, Rispens T, Wolbink G. Immunogenicity of biological therapeutics: from assay to patient. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012;24(3):306–11.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin SK, et al. Anti-erythropoietin and anti-thrombopoietin antibodies induced after administration of recombinant human erythropoietin. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(12):2237–41.PubMedCrossRef Shin SK, et al. Anti-erythropoietin and anti-thrombopoietin antibodies induced after administration of recombinant human erythropoietin. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(12):2237–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Peyvandi F, Garagiola I, Seregni S. Future of coagulation factor replacement therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(Suppl 1):84–98.PubMedCrossRef Peyvandi F, Garagiola I, Seregni S. Future of coagulation factor replacement therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(Suppl 1):84–98.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Finco D, et al. Comparison of competitive ligand-binding assay and bioassay formats for the measurement of neutralizing antibodies to protein therapeutics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;54(2):351–8.PubMedCrossRef Finco D, et al. Comparison of competitive ligand-binding assay and bioassay formats for the measurement of neutralizing antibodies to protein therapeutics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;54(2):351–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Buttel IC, et al. Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level. Biologicals. 2011;39(2):100–9.PubMedCrossRef Buttel IC, et al. Taking immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins to the next level. Biologicals. 2011;39(2):100–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Jawa V, et al. T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: Preclinical assessment and mitigation. Clin Immunol. 2013;149(3):534–55.PubMedCrossRef Jawa V, et al. T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: Preclinical assessment and mitigation. Clin Immunol. 2013;149(3):534–55.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollander I, Kunz A, Hamann PR. Selection of reaction additives used in the preparation of monomeric antibody-calicheamicin conjugates. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19(1):358–61.PubMedCrossRef Hollander I, Kunz A, Hamann PR. Selection of reaction additives used in the preparation of monomeric antibody-calicheamicin conjugates. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19(1):358–61.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorovits B, Krinos-Fiorotti C. Proposed mechanism of off-target toxicity for antibody–drug conjugates driven by mannose receptor uptake. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62(2):217–23.PubMedCrossRef Gorovits B, Krinos-Fiorotti C. Proposed mechanism of off-target toxicity for antibody–drug conjugates driven by mannose receptor uptake. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62(2):217–23.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoofring SA, et al. Immunogenicity testing strategy and bioanalytical assays for antibody–drug conjugates. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(9):1041–55.PubMedCrossRef Hoofring SA, et al. Immunogenicity testing strategy and bioanalytical assays for antibody–drug conjugates. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(9):1041–55.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Koren E, et al. Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products. J Immunol Methods. 2008;333(1–2):1–9.PubMedCrossRef Koren E, et al. Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products. J Immunol Methods. 2008;333(1–2):1–9.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbosa MD, et al. Addressing drug effects on cut point determination for an anti-drug antibody assay. J Immunol Methods. 2012;384(1–2):152–6.PubMedCrossRef Barbosa MD, et al. Addressing drug effects on cut point determination for an anti-drug antibody assay. J Immunol Methods. 2012;384(1–2):152–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Practical Considerations for the Pharmacokinetic and Immunogenic Assessment of Antibody–Drug Conjugates
verfasst von
Melody Sauerborn
William van Dongen
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
BioDrugs / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1173-8804
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-190X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-014-0096-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

BioDrugs 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe