Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Research Article

Using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to Identify Prescribing Thresholds for Cardiovascular Disease

verfasst von: Chris Schilling, Duncan Mortimer, Kim Dalziel, Emma Heeley, John Chalmers, Philip Clarke

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objective

Many guidelines for clinical decisions are hierarchical and nonlinear. Evaluating if these guidelines are used in practice requires methods that can identify such structures and thresholds. Classification and regression trees (CART) were used to analyse prescribing patterns of Australian general practitioners (GPs) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our aim was to identify if GPs use absolute risk (AR) guidelines in favour of individual risk factors to inform their prescribing decisions of lipid-lowering medications.

Methods

We employed administrative prescribing information that is linked to patient-level data from a clinical assessment and patient survey (the AusHeart Study), and assessed prescribing of lipid-lowering medications over a 12-month period for patients (n = 1903) who were not using such medications prior to recruitment. CART models were developed to explain prescribing practice. Out-of-sample performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and optimised via pruning.

Results

We found that individual risk factors (low-density lipoprotein, diabetes, triglycerides and a history of CVD), GP-estimated rather than Framingham AR, and sociodemographic factors (household income, education) were the predominant drivers of GP prescribing. However, sociodemographic factors and some individual risk factors (triglycerides and CVD history) only become relevant for patients with a particular profile of other risk factors. The ROC area under the curve was 0.63 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.64).

Conclusions

There is little evidence that AR guidelines recommended by the National Heart Foundation and National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance, or conditional individual risk eligibility guidelines from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, are adopted in prescribing practice. The hierarchy of conditional relationships between risk factors and socioeconomic factors identified by CART provides new insights into prescribing decisions. Overall, CART is a useful addition to the analyst’s toolkit when investigating healthcare decisions.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
For example, the American Heart Association (AHA) recommends using a modified Framingham equation [3]. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends an absolute CVD risk algorithm known as QRISK2 [4].
 
2
Prior exposure to medication is not preferred as we would observe risk factors after response to treatment.
 
3
Similar complications exist in clinical decision making in general [17], and in observed (as well as recommended) prescribing patterns for statins [1, 18, 19].
 
4
This has been shown to be an optimal method for model selection [29].
 
5
This identifies all the nodes where the predictor is selected, sums the improvement in classification from each of these and divides by the number of tree branches [28].
 
6
Bagging or ‘bootstrapped aggregating’ is a method for generating multiple versions of a tree to allow evaluation of predictor stability [31].
 
7
For example, there is some evidence to suggest that compliance increases with the number of risk factors [45].
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonner C, et al. General practitioners’ use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study. Med J Aust. 2013;199(7):485–9.CrossRefPubMed Bonner C, et al. General practitioners’ use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study. Med J Aust. 2013;199(7):485–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen J, et al. General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004812.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jansen J, et al. General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004812.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenland P, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(25):e50–103.CrossRefPubMed Greenland P, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(25):e50–103.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone NJ, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889–934. Stone NJ, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889–934.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heeley EL, et al. Cardiovascular risk perception and evidence-practice gaps in Australian general practice (the AusHEART study). Med J Aust. 2010;192(5):254–9.PubMed Heeley EL, et al. Cardiovascular risk perception and evidence-practice gaps in Australian general practice (the AusHEART study). Med J Aust. 2010;192(5):254–9.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Razavian M, et al. Cardiovascular risk management in chronic kidney disease in general practice (the AusHEART study). Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2012;27(4):1396–402.CrossRef Razavian M, et al. Cardiovascular risk management in chronic kidney disease in general practice (the AusHEART study). Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2012;27(4):1396–402.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwar N, et al. GPs’ views of absolute cardiovascular risk and its role in primary prevention. Aust Fam Physician. 2005;34(6):503–4.PubMed Zwar N, et al. GPs’ views of absolute cardiovascular risk and its role in primary prevention. Aust Fam Physician. 2005;34(6):503–4.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Varian HR. Big data: new tricks for econometrics. J Econ Perspect. 2014;28(2):3–27.CrossRef Varian HR. Big data: new tricks for econometrics. J Econ Perspect. 2014;28(2):3–27.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Knott RJ, et al. How fair is Medicare? The income-related distribution of Medicare benefits with special focus on chronic care items. Med J Aust. 2012;197:625–30.CrossRefPubMed Knott RJ, et al. How fair is Medicare? The income-related distribution of Medicare benefits with special focus on chronic care items. Med J Aust. 2012;197:625–30.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Knott RJ, et al. The effects of reduced copayments on discontinuation and adherence failure to statin medication in Australia. Health Policy. 2015;119(5):620–7.CrossRefPubMed Knott RJ, et al. The effects of reduced copayments on discontinuation and adherence failure to statin medication in Australia. Health Policy. 2015;119(5):620–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Drakopoulos SA. Hierarchical choice in economics. J Econ Surv. 1994;8(2):133–53.CrossRef Drakopoulos SA. Hierarchical choice in economics. J Econ Surv. 1994;8(2):133–53.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econ Psychol. 2002;23(3):383–98.CrossRef Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econ Psychol. 2002;23(3):383–98.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. General statement for lipid-lowering drugs prescribed as pharmaceutical benefits. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; 2014. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. General statement for lipid-lowering drugs prescribed as pharmaceutical benefits. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; 2014.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg AX, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38.CrossRefPubMed Garg AX, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong M, et al. Patterns of antihypertensive prescribing, discontinuation and switching among a Hong Kong Chinese population from over one million prescriptions. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(10):714–6.CrossRefPubMed Wong M, et al. Patterns of antihypertensive prescribing, discontinuation and switching among a Hong Kong Chinese population from over one million prescriptions. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(10):714–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomcikova D, et al. Epidemiology, quality improvement and outcome: risk of in-hospital mortality identified according to the typology of patients with acute heart failure: classification tree analysis on data from the Acute Heart Failure Database–main registry. J Crit Care. 2013;28:250–8.CrossRefPubMed Tomcikova D, et al. Epidemiology, quality improvement and outcome: risk of in-hospital mortality identified according to the typology of patients with acute heart failure: classification tree analysis on data from the Acute Heart Failure Database–main registry. J Crit Care. 2013;28:250–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarro Mdel C, et al. Discriminative ability of heel quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures: application of optimal threshold cutoff values using classification and regression tree models. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;91(2):114–20.CrossRefPubMed Navarro Mdel C, et al. Discriminative ability of heel quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures: application of optimal threshold cutoff values using classification and regression tree models. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;91(2):114–20.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi K-Q, et al. Risk stratification of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis with ascites based on classification and regression tree analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(5):6161–9.CrossRefPubMed Shi K-Q, et al. Risk stratification of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis with ascites based on classification and regression tree analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(5):6161–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Breiman L, et al. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1984. Breiman L, et al. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1984.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Briand B, et al. A similarity measure to assess the stability of classification trees. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(4):1208–17.CrossRef Briand B, et al. A similarity measure to assess the stability of classification trees. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(4):1208–17.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammed MA, El Sayed C, Marshall T. Patient and other factors influencing the prescribing of cardiovascular prevention therapy in the general practice setting with and without nurse assessment. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(3):498–506.CrossRefPubMed Mohammed MA, El Sayed C, Marshall T. Patient and other factors influencing the prescribing of cardiovascular prevention therapy in the general practice setting with and without nurse assessment. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(3):498–506.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat The Mathworks Inc. Matlab and statistics toolbox release 2015a. Natick: The Mathworks; 2015. The Mathworks Inc. Matlab and statistics toolbox release 2015a. Natick: The Mathworks; 2015.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI. 1995;2:1137–43. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. IJCAI. 1995;2:1137–43.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitsantas P, Hollander M, Li LM. Assessing the stability of classification trees using Florida birth data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2007;137(12):3917–29.CrossRef Kitsantas P, Hollander M, Li LM. Assessing the stability of classification trees using Florida birth data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2007;137(12):3917–29.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24(2):123–40. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24(2):123–40.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dannegger F. Tree stability diagnostics and some remedies for instability. Stat Med. 2000;19(4):475–91.CrossRefPubMed Dannegger F. Tree stability diagnostics and some remedies for instability. Stat Med. 2000;19(4):475–91.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(4):323.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(4):323.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopert R, Henry D. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: economic evaluation works… but is not a panacea. Aust Prescr. 2002;25(6):126. Lopert R, Henry D. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: economic evaluation works… but is not a panacea. Aust Prescr. 2002;25(6):126.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat French SD, et al. Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65471.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed French SD, et al. Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65471.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie JE, et al. Evidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):91.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McKenzie JE, et al. Evidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):91.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie JE, et al. Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):86.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McKenzie JE, et al. Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):86.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Prevedello LM, et al. Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram? Am J Med. 2013;126(11):975–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Prevedello LM, et al. Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram? Am J Med. 2013;126(11):975–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–78.CrossRef Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–78.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kearney P, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):117–25.CrossRefPubMed Kearney P, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):117–25.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashworth M, et al. Social deprivation and statin prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the new UK general practitioner ‘Quality and Outcomes Framework’. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007;29(1):40–7.CrossRef Ashworth M, et al. Social deprivation and statin prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the new UK general practitioner ‘Quality and Outcomes Framework’. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007;29(1):40–7.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Weitoft GR, et al. Education and drug use in Sweden—a nationwide register-based study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(10):1020–8.CrossRefPubMed Weitoft GR, et al. Education and drug use in Sweden—a nationwide register-based study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(10):1020–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Heeley E, et al. Disparities between prescribing of secondary prevention therapies for stroke and coronary artery disease in general practice. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(8):649–54.CrossRefPubMed Heeley E, et al. Disparities between prescribing of secondary prevention therapies for stroke and coronary artery disease in general practice. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(8):649–54.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Latry P, et al. Adherence with statins in a real-life setting is better when associated cardiovascular risk factors increase: a cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11(1):46.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Latry P, et al. Adherence with statins in a real-life setting is better when associated cardiovascular risk factors increase: a cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11(1):46.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Field CA, Welsh AH. Bootstrapping clustered data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2007;69(3):369–90.CrossRef Field CA, Welsh AH. Bootstrapping clustered data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2007;69(3):369–90.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to Identify Prescribing Thresholds for Cardiovascular Disease
verfasst von
Chris Schilling
Duncan Mortimer
Kim Dalziel
Emma Heeley
John Chalmers
Philip Clarke
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0342-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

PharmacoEconomics 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe