Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 4/2016

01.04.2016 | What's New in Intensive Care

What’s new in the quantification of causal effects from longitudinal cohort studies: a brief introduction to marginal structural models for intensivists

verfasst von: S. Bailly, R. Pirracchio, J. F. Timsit

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

When randomized controlled trials are not possible, observational longitudinal data may be the only option to quantify the impact of a treatment on an outcome [1]. As an illustration, we assessed the impact of empirical systemic antifungal therapy (SAT) on mortality in critically ill patients [2]. A regression may be used to model the relationship between SAT and mortality, with adjustment on potential confounders. In many situations, the regression coefficient cannot be interpreted causally, particularly when SAT administration is a time-dependent variable [35]. Indeed, besides a direct causal effect, there may be several paths linking the treatment to the outcome through various confounders, i.e., variables associated with treatment allocation and with the outcome which may confound the association of interest. In this situation, the association measure provided by standard regression may differ from what clinicians often seek, which is a quantification of the direct causal effect between an exposure and an outcome. This situation may be illustrated by considering severe sepsis as a single confounder. Indeed, severe sepsis may trigger SAT while it also impacts mortality. Hence, SAT and mortality share a common cause, i.e., an indirect path linking SAT to mortality (Fig. E1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material). The standard approach based on logistic regression, for instance, may lead to a biased estimation of the causal effect of SAT on mortality because some time-dependent variables (i.e., septic shock) which may be affected by previous treatment history can in turn affect both further treatments and the outcome [3]. To overcome the limitation of standard regression approaches, new specific statistical methods have been developed to handle this type of bias and are often referred to as causal inference methods. They were first introduced in intensive care unit (ICU) literature by Bekaert et al. [6]. …
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson K, Hartz AJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 342:1878–1886CrossRefPubMed Benson K, Hartz AJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 342:1878–1886CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailly S, Bouadma L, Azoulay E, Orgeas MG, Adrie C, Souweine B, Schwebel C, Maubon D, Hamidfar-Roy R, Darmon M, Wolff M, Cornet M, Timsit JF (2015) Failure of empirical systemic antifungal therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1139–1146CrossRefPubMed Bailly S, Bouadma L, Azoulay E, Orgeas MG, Adrie C, Souweine B, Schwebel C, Maubon D, Hamidfar-Roy R, Darmon M, Wolff M, Cornet M, Timsit JF (2015) Failure of empirical systemic antifungal therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1139–1146CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560CrossRefPubMed Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Resche-Rigon M, Pirracchio R, Robin M, De Latour RP, Sibon D, Ades L, Ribaud P, Fermand JP, Thieblemont C, Socie G, Chevret S (2012) Estimating the treatment effect from non-randomized studies: the example of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in hematological diseases. BMC Blood Disord 12:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Resche-Rigon M, Pirracchio R, Robin M, De Latour RP, Sibon D, Ades L, Ribaud P, Fermand JP, Thieblemont C, Socie G, Chevret S (2012) Estimating the treatment effect from non-randomized studies: the example of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in hematological diseases. BMC Blood Disord 12:10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerhard T, Delaney JA, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Shuster J, Brumback BA, Johnson JA, Pepine CJ, Winterstein AG (2012) Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gerhard T, Delaney JA, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Shuster J, Brumback BA, Johnson JA, Pepine CJ, Winterstein AG (2012) Comparing marginal structural models to standard methods for estimating treatment effects of antihypertensive combination therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekaert M, Timsit JF, Vansteelandt S, Depuydt P, Vesin A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Decruyenaere J, Clec’h C, Azoulay E, Benoit D (2011) Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a reappraisal using causal analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184:1133–1139CrossRefPubMed Bekaert M, Timsit JF, Vansteelandt S, Depuydt P, Vesin A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Decruyenaere J, Clec’h C, Azoulay E, Benoit D (2011) Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a reappraisal using causal analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184:1133–1139CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirracchio R, Carone M, Rigon MR, Caruana E, Mebazaa A, Chevret S (2013) Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates. Stat Methods Med Res. doi:10.1177/0962280213507034 Pirracchio R, Carone M, Rigon MR, Caruana E, Mebazaa A, Chevret S (2013) Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates. Stat Methods Med Res. doi:10.​1177/​0962280213507034​
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernan MA, Brumback B, Robins JM (2000) Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 11:561–570CrossRefPubMed Hernan MA, Brumback B, Robins JM (2000) Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 11:561–570CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Do DP, Wang L, Elliott MR (2013) Investigating the relationship between neighborhood poverty and mortality risk: a marginal structural modeling approach. Soc Sci Med 91:58–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Do DP, Wang L, Elliott MR (2013) Investigating the relationship between neighborhood poverty and mortality risk: a marginal structural modeling approach. Soc Sci Med 91:58–66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang S, Eaton CB, Lu J, Lapane KL (2014) Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 23:560–571CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang S, Eaton CB, Lu J, Lapane KL (2014) Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 23:560–571CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Muriel A, Penuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Arroliga A, Abraira V, Thille A, Brochard L, Nin N, Davies A, Amin P, Du B, Raymondos K, Rios F, Violi D, Maggiore S, Soares MA, Gonzalez M, Abroug F, Bulow H, Hurtado J, Kuiper M, Moreno R, Zeggwagh AA, Villagomez A, Jibaja M, Soto L, D’Empaire G, Matamis D, Koh Y, Anzueto A, Ferguson N, Esteban A (2015) Impact of sedation and analgesia during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation on outcome. A marginal structural model causal analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3854-6 Muriel A, Penuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Arroliga A, Abraira V, Thille A, Brochard L, Nin N, Davies A, Amin P, Du B, Raymondos K, Rios F, Violi D, Maggiore S, Soares MA, Gonzalez M, Abroug F, Bulow H, Hurtado J, Kuiper M, Moreno R, Zeggwagh AA, Villagomez A, Jibaja M, Soto L, D’Empaire G, Matamis D, Koh Y, Anzueto A, Ferguson N, Esteban A (2015) Impact of sedation and analgesia during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation on outcome. A marginal structural model causal analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-3854-6
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Munoz ID, van der Laan M (2012) Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions. Biometrics 68:541–549CrossRefPubMed Munoz ID, van der Laan M (2012) Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions. Biometrics 68:541–549CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
What’s new in the quantification of causal effects from longitudinal cohort studies: a brief introduction to marginal structural models for intensivists
verfasst von
S. Bailly
R. Pirracchio
J. F. Timsit
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3919-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Intensive Care Medicine 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.