Anzeige
Erschienen in:
15.12.2017 | Knee
Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 6/2018
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the effect of tibial rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on clinical outcomes and assess the eventual cut-off values for tibial TKA rotation leading to poor outcomes.
Methods
A detailed and systematic search from 1997 to 2017 of the Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews, and the Google Scholar databases was performed using the keyword terms “total knee arthroplasty”, “total knee replacement”, “tibial alignment”, “tibial malalignement”, “tibial rotation”, “rotational error”, “axis”, “angle”, “tibial malrotation”, “clinical outcome”, in several combinations. The modified Coleman scoring methodology (mCMS) was used. All the primary TKAs studies analyzing correlation between clinical results and tibial rotation were included.
Results
Five articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 333 arthroplasties were included in this review; 139 had tibial component malalignment, while 194 were in control groups. The mean age of patients was 67.3 (SD 0.57) years. The mean average postoperative follow-up delay was 34.7 months (range 21–70). The mean mCMS score was 59.2 points indicating good methodological quality in the included studies. Functional outcomes were assessed through KSS, OKS, KOOS and VAS, negatively related to tibial internal rotation.
Conclusions
Our review confirmed that excessive internal rotation of the tibial TKA component represents a significant risk factor for pain and inferior functional outcomes after TKA (> 10° of internal rotation demonstrated the common value), since external rotation does not affect the results. However, a universal precise cut-off value has not been found in the available literature and there remains a debate about CT rotation assessment and surgical intra-operative landmarks.
Level of evidence
III.