Erschienen in:
27.11.2019 | ANKLE
The calcaneofibular ligament has distinct anatomic morphological variants: an anatomical cadaveric study
verfasst von:
Bruno S. Pereira, C. Niek van Dijk, Renato Andrade, Ricardo P. Casaroli-Marano, João Espregueira-Mendes, Xavier Martin Oliva
Erschienen in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
|
Ausgabe 1/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate if the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) presents morphologic variants and measure the morphometrics of the ligament and its footprints
Methods
An anatomical study of 47 fresh-frozen below-the-knee ankle specimens was performed. Lateral ankle structures were dissected to expose the CFL. Overdissection was avoided to not modify the native morphology. The morphology (number and orientation of CFL bundles) and measurements of CFL insertions were recorded with ankle secured in neutral position.
Results
Four distinct morphological-oriented shapes of the CFL were observed. These included single bundle, Y-shape double bundle, V-shape double bundle, and associated with the lateral talocalcaneal ligament. The most frequent CFL morphology observed was the single bundle and the Y-shape double bundle, present in 21 (44.7%) and 13 (27.7%) ankles. The V-shape double bundle and the CFL double bundle associated with the lateral talocalcaneal ligaments were less common, appearing only in eight (17.0%) and five (10.6%) ankles. The CFL length was higher in single bundle and Y-shaped double bundle CFL variants, about 30 mm each. Footprint morphometrics were heterogenous amongst the different CFL variants.
Conclusion
The CFL presents four distinct morphological-oriented shapes. The double bundle, V-shaped and Y-shaped CFL variants are uncommon and poorly reported in the literature. Their relation to the lateral talocalcaneal ligament and the inferior fascicle of the anterior talofibular ligament requires further research. The CFL morphology provides detailed knowledge of CFL anatomy that can improve diagnostic procedures. Furthermore, this information can fine-tune graft selection and sizing and allow a more precise anatomic placement during surgical reconstruction.